Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:19, 30 September 2024

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic: You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days) You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances) Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.

A news item involving 2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 September 2024.

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Israel Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Project Israel To Do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles. Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page. Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration. Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005 Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel. Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Misplaced Pages. Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data. Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes. Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention. Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Misplaced Pages requested maps in Israel. NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries Photo : Add pictures to articles in Misplaced Pages requested photographs in Israel. Stubs : See Israel stubs. Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People Other : Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary. Lebanon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Asian / Middle East / Post-Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Middle Eastern military history task force Post-Cold War task force Death Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 27 September 2024

It has been proposed in this section that 2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike be renamed and moved to 27 September 2024 Beirut attacks. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike → 27 September 2024 Beirut attacks or 27 September 2024 Beirut attack – While Israel states it only targeted the Hezbollah headquarters, several RS say the attack lay waste to "Several apartment blocks" or "multiple high-rise apartment buildings". Given such an immense destruction of civilian infrastructure, we should not put Israeli claims that this was a "precise strike" on just the Hezbollah HQ in wikivoice (violation of WP:POVTITLE]), and instead pick the most neutral title. VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 21:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose, the suggested title is empty of meaning. A more relevant move would be to attempted assassination of Hassan Nasrallah or something similar Galamore (talk) 22:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Had the attack only killed/injured Nasrallah and those close to him, I'd have agreed with you. But the amount of collateral damage is immense and reducing it to one person, is quite POV. Also, there is precedent: consider the 1981 Iraqi embassy bombing in Beirut whose stated target was Iraqi PM Tariq Aziz or the Brighton hotel bombing, whose stated target was British PM Margaret Thatcher.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 22:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• Consider the Israeli attempt to assassinate Muhammad Deif. The article is called 13 July 2024 al-Mawasi attack, based on consensus on the talk page. That event killed 90+ people and injured 300+, and it is quite likely that the death toll for this event might be similarly high.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 23:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

• Support: the proposed move strikes me as in line with existing practice, the wording in RS, and neutrality. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

@AntiDionysius:, fyi, I have changed the proposed title from "27 September 2024 Beirut attack" to "27 September 2024 Beirut attacks" (notice the plural).VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 01:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose with multiple additional attacks on Beirut weapons storage locations in the evening of the same day, but not on Hezbollah HQs, a better title might have to be the 27 September 2024 Beirut attacks (plural, not singular). This is going to take a few days to sort out what all these multiple attacks did, and how many Hezbollah & Iranian operatives may have been targeted in the attacks, before a WP:COMMONNAME can really be chosen for the longer term. N2e (talk) 00:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

You're right about the plural: "The series of massive explosions sent huge clouds of smoke soaring above the densely populated Haret Hreik neighbourhood in Dahiyeh, southern Beirut, around dusk on Friday." France24's headline is also "Terror, panic as Israeli strikes wipe out Beirut buildings". I'll change it.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 01:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

That can be its own thing, the most notable thing here is the killing of Nasrallah, and that needs its own article. Personisinsterest (talk) 13:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose This particular, single strike is going to be the notable one among many others which are part of the wider conflict. Ultimograph5 (talk) 03:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@Ultimograph5 can you clarify? It seems there were multiple strikes in the same location. For example, France24 says "The strikes killed at least two people and injured 76, Lebanon's health ministry said in a preliminary toll." Notice the plural.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 03:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@Vice regent I suppose the word "strike" is confusing, France24 seems to be defining "strike" as one bomb while I was referring to the whole event which lasted like a minute. My definition is in line with other articles like Israeli airstrike on the Iranian consulate in Damascus but I'm not sure there's any standard Ultimograph5 (talk) 04:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@Ultimograph5 to clarify then, you'd be ok with "27 September 2024 Beirut attack" as opposed to "27 September 2024 Beirut attacks"? VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 04:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Support, it is not even confirmed he was killed yet. Also, given the nature of the bombings (attacking apartment blocks), it might be best to go with "attack" same as 13 July 2024 al-Mawasi attack as noted above. </MarkiPoli> <talk /><cont /> 08:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Now that it is confirmed he is dead, it still matters that potentially hundreds are dead from airstrikes on apartment blocks in a densely populated suburb. This article probably should just be called Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah (as it actually was when I first replied, IDK why), as I can't think of a not-unwieldy title that incorporates the civilian casualties in it, however we should have another article that goes in depth on the potentially hundreds dead.</MarkiPoli> <talk /><cont />

• Support per above. We did not call Deif's attempted assassination "attempted assassination of Mohammed Deif". TwistedAxe 10:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Killing is confirmed now but still think we need a separate article on the bombings. Selfstudier (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I think this should be its own standalone article too, yes. Although I think we can incorporate both the attack and the assassination in the same article perhaps? Otherwise two separate articles are okay too IMO. TwistedAxe 11:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Strong oppose he is dead. No need for more ambiguity which is not in line with alike articles DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 12:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• Strong oppose, even if civilians were killed in the attack, absolutely the most notable thing here is that Nasrallah has been assassinated, confirmed by Hezbollah. Personisinsterest (talk) 12:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• Strong supporrt Misplaced Pages should not adopt a belligerent's rationale in the title for an attack that seems likely to have killed dozens Zellfire999 (talk) 12:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• Move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah – With his assassination confirmed, it is now a forgone matter that the most notable event within the scope of this article, and the name by which this event will be known is as the assassination of Hassan Nasrallah. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 13:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Note: This was actually the title of the article when I first !voted, did someone move it and then it got reverted whilst this RfC was going on? </MarkiPoli> <talk /><cont /> 13:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, the page was moved by a new user. We could just revert that but best to just let the RM work itself out. It appears we are approaching SPEEDY. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah – agreed, this is the major event and the relevant title. Afdshah (talk) 06:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
• Move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, per Coffeeandcrumbs above. This is the single most notable and significant aspect of this event, and is commonly described as such by RS. ABHammad (talk) 13:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• Move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah. I'm the creator and I used the current name 2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike since this is what was known at the time of creation. The specific date + place title is bad 'cause it says nothing on the real topic here. Now that all related parties confirmed he is dead I think that's the main topic in this article and the title should mention that. EnfantDeLaVille (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• Rename Killing of Hassan Nasrallah, in line with Killing of Osama bin Laden. To characterize it as an assassination is reflective of a minor point-of-view. Zaathras (talk) 14:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  @Zaathras can you explain the difference? OdNahlawi (talk) 15:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  My personal opinion is that assassinations are politically motivated, and Nasrallah was a terrorist combatant, not a political target. The Misplaced Pages-based reason is that the majority of reliable sources appear to not use the A-word in their coverage, except to note that like-minded (to Nasrallah and his cause) individuals and groups may refers to it as that. Zaathras (talk) 20:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  See WP:DEATHS. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  Interesting that you link to something that your own vote above does not adhere to. Zaathras (talk) 22:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  The NYTimes: The assassination, which Israel said hit the Iranian-backed militia’s underground headquarters, was a stunning escalation of Israel’s campaign against Hezbollah in a conflict that has gone on for nearly a year.The Guardian repeatedly calls it an assassination. BBC: Israel’s assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, the long-standing leader of Hezbollah, is a major escalation in its war with the Lebanese militant group.

  The claim that the majority of reliable sources appear to not use the A-word in their coverage, except to note that like-minded (to Nasrallah and his cause) individuals and groups may refers to it as that is completely made up. nableezy - 00:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah . It's a better name considering we can now confirm the death of Secretary-General of Hezbollah Hassan Nasrallah. Also, it's a much more recognizable name opposed to 27 September 2024 Beirut attacks . TheFloridaMan (talk) 14:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• Move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah - and the claim that is a minor POV is emphatically untrue. Basically every story I see about this calls it an assassination, NYT, The Guardian, Foreign Policy for example all call it an assassination. Claiming it is a minor point-of-view is something that requires substantiation, not just bald assertion. nableezy - 15:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• Move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, this is why this airstrike was worth an article in the beginning, and after the confirmation that would be the most precise way to describe the event. OdNahlawi (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• Move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, per what was said above and the example of Assassination of Ismail Haniyeh. — Sundostund mppria 17:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose as proposed, neutral on Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, as the attack was aimed at Hezbollah headquarters and Nasrallah. It's perfectly true that civilian infrastructure was also destroyed, but that was a necessary and undesirable side-effec resulting from Hezbollah making their headquarters under said civilian infrastructure. Animal lover |666| 22:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose as proposed as it far less clear what the attack was about. As for "Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah" that's somewhat better than the proposed yet still inferior to the present name. As I understand it, this was an attack on the entire Hezbollah leadership. gidonb (talk) 01:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah in line with Ismael Haniyeh and other notable figures. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 09:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
• Move to Assassination since the attacks in Lebanon generally, including the one here, are being dealt with at September 2024 Lebanon strikes Selfstudier (talk) 09:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Support 27 September 2024 Beirut attacks, since more than the intended target were killed. This also meets WP:NCWWW. Lewisguile (talk) 09:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Support the move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah. A bombing attack or any kind of hit that kills and injures many people among whom happened to be a well known military, political, ideological person could never be named "assassination ". Here, however, the overwhelmingly evident target was one single person, Nasrallah, a fact confirmed by both sides; no one argued that his death was incidental to a bombing attack against Beirut. What it all quite clearly came down to was an organized attack against the life of one specific person, an assassination effort that also resulted in a significant number of collateral casualties. This was an assassination, albeit a very bloody one. We should make of "2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike" a Redirect to the Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah. -The Gnome (talk) 11:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Support: Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, the main argument against this is the fact that other militants were killed, but assassination of Rafiq Hariri had multiple other officials killed as well. Prodrummer619 (talk) 11:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Snow close and move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah; the original rationale makes no sense anymore after the current news. PhotographyEdits (talk) 15:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose: the attack was to Hezbola, not to Beirut. That's the focus of all news headlines. Cambalachero (talk) 15:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Move to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah. The current and the suggested titles may be factually correct, but they don't convey the main reason this attack took place. They do not give the relevant information. TheBooker66 (talk) 18:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Strong Oppose: Per above comments. Spilia4 (talk) 23:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose. as proposed. Weak support Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah per above comments. estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Strong Oppose: 2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike is a good and appropriate title. The target was Hezbollah, Nasrallah and his subordinates. AideDésintéressée (talk) 02:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose - no reliable sources that I'm aware of are actually disputing the stated Hezbollah targets. Damage to many buildings doesn't imply much about what the targets were. The neutrality argument seems based on a hypothetical controversy about targeting which hasn't actually occurred. Also oppose Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah - my understanding is that assassination doesn't have a standard definition in IHL, but generally implies unlawful killing. A title focused on Nasrallah could make sense, but I would suggest Killing of Hassan Nasrallah, which seems more clearly accurate and neutral while also matching Killing of Osama bin Laden etc. — xDanielx /_C\ 03:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

  Why do you think it implies unlawful killing and what of the any number of reliable sources that has assassination? Who said this was an international law topic anyway? nableezy - 03:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

  I guess there's plenty of precedent for both in reliable sources. Most sources seem to say both "assassination" and "killing" at some point. I did notice which say "killing" only; I didn't notice any which say "assassination".

  It seems prevalence leans slightly toward "killing". I still feel "killing" is preferable since it's unquestionably precise, whereas there could be questions about whether "assassination" is precise. Is there a particular concern with "killing"? — xDanielx /_C\ 04:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

  Precision. nableezy - 09:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

  My understanding is that assassinations are only illegal under national laws, but not always illegal under international law. In this case, I highly doubt it was legal under Lebanese law to kill Nasrallah. If you want examples of articles called "assassination" when they targeted the leader who was at war, here are some: Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, Assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, Assassination of Lord Mountbatten, Assassination attempts on Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Assassination attempts on Adolf Hitler etc. VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 05:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose suggested title, but okay with moving to Assassination/Killing of Nasrallah poketape (talk) 06:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose any moving. The strike was on the headquarters, and is a significant event in and of itself. There is nothing to stop other pages from linking to this page with a different heading, or to put in a redirect, but the strike was on the headquarters. This wasn't a sniper on a grassy knoll somewhere. TimeEngineer (talk) 07:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

POV

Yet again, the background is POV. It mentions Yemeni attacks on Israel, but says nothing about Israeli attacks on Gaza, where it has killed 40,000 people. We've been over this at Talk:September 2024 Lebanon strikes#More background issues.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 21:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Minor infobox note

Shouldn’t the little infobox blurb include that this was also a part of the September 2024 Lebanon strikes? The Wikimonger (talk) 00:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 September 2024

This edit request to Assassination of Hassan Nasrallah has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Nasrallah is dead. Namnaam (talk) 08:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: It's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please put what changes you want made in a "change X to Y" format.</MarkiPoli> <talk /><cont /> 09:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Why is this an article?

We still have very little information, the dust still hasn't settled. Either delete this article, rename it or merge it into another article. We still don't know if Nasrallah is dead or not apart from hearsay from the IDF. No evidence has yet been presented by either sides. Disregard this section, Nasrallah has been confirmed dead by Hezbollah themselves in a statement. TwistedAxe 09:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Operation named "New Order"

The assassination operation was named "New Order" (Hebrew: "סדר חדש")

Sources:

https://x.com/idfonline/status/1839945167354163378 (IDF Hebrew twitter account)

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/idf-says-operation-to-kill-nasrallah-was-code-named-new-order/ (Times of Israel news report) Redbeansoup (talk) 11:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Possible to mention the operation code name in the article? Redbeansoup (talk) 11:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, very good piece of information to add. You can add it yourself or add it and let someone else polish it. TwistedAxe 11:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Well unfortunately I'm not an extended confirmed user. But thanks. Redbeansoup (talk) 20:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Can someone transliterate? Bitspectator ⛩️ 11:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Done. Should be in the article now. TwistedAxe 12:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Hebrew speaker here. I fixed - it's "Seder Hadash". Seder סדר = order, and Hadash חדש = new Galamore (talk) 12:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

What happened on October 8?

Please see this discussion, and participate there, and then whatever is decided should be replicated here. Currently there is a WP:V violation in the article.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 12:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Are there still any violations in September_2024_Lebanon_strikes#Background? If not, the first part of the Background here should almost be the same. Bitspectator ⛩️ 12:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Yeah this looks good. We should also remove the POV tag from that article's background if there are no further objections.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 13:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@Vice regent, I made a bold edit and transferred the relevant text from that article here. Everyone, please let me know if there are issues with this. Bitspectator ⛩️ 13:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your edit was partially reverted in a way I don't agree with. Hezbollah had explicitly cited the killing of women and children as a reason for continuing its attacks. If we can say Israel's reasons for killing Nasrallah is his attacks on Israel, why can't we say what are Hezbollah's reasons for attacking Israel? VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 15:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, agreed. The reasoning that we could also talk about rape during Oct 7 doesn't follow because it isn't part of the stated justification for either party in this specific war. Not sure if I'm allowed to re-revert. I do appreciate trying to trim down Background though. Bitspectator ⛩️ 15:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

• PeleYoetz undid the changes and introduced WP:V errors in the article. This, in spite of constant discussion.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 20:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  The source says "Hezbollah and Israel exchanged fire on Sunday, with Hezbollah firing missiles on Israeli positions in Shebaa Farms, which is claimed by Lebanon and was captured by Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War, in “solidarity” with the Palestinians." So we should also state "solidarity with Palestinians" as per the source.

  Also PeleYoetz said "bombing not mentioned in the cited sources", but that's false. The AJ source given says "More than 500 Palestinians, including women and children, have been killed in Israeli air raids on Gaza since Saturday, with thousands of others wounded."VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 21:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Lead pov

Very much like, we currently have NPOV violations in the lead. If we're going to put in Netanyahu's comment that Israel "yearns for peace", we should also put the Lebanese PM's comment that "Israeli aggression on Lebanon is a war of extermination". VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 12:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I disagree. This war is between Israel and Hezbollah. We can put what Hezbollah leading officials say on this Galamore (talk) 13:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Israel destroyed 6 apartment buildings in the middle of the Lebanese capital. I think their reaction carries as much WP:WEIGHT as the Israeli one.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 13:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Lebanon's PM is severly weakened due to the massive influence of Hezbollah in his country (largest than the national army, a state within a state, etc.), I'm not sure how weight should be given for such statements. As a country, Lebanon is not really a side in the conflict, at least at this point. Galamore (talk) 13:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Yet his views are widely quoted and republished even in Israeli newspapers. Clearly the world — and most importantly RS — are interested in his reactions.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 14:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@Vice regent it appears the POV tag was removed by @Prodrummer619 without any significant changes to the flagged section. -> Link to diff <- Kcmastrpc (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Infobox civilian attack

Is there a more suitable infobox than "civilian attack"? —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 14:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@St.nerol. The similar Killing of Osama bin Laden uses "Infobox historical event", do you want to make the transition? Galamore (talk) 15:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I just found the Infobox military operation, which is perhaps even better. We have the same issue at 2024 Lebanon pager explosions. —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 15:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I agree, military operation should be used. LuxembourgLover (talk) 19:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Given that the attack flattened 6 civilian apartment buildings, I'd say the infobox is not inappropriate.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 15:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Which infobox would you prefer, @Vice regent? What about the content of the infobox? The lede and infobox didn't originally mention civilian casualties at all, so have added those in, but is it explicit enough? Lewisguile (talk) 08:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Selective removal of casualties

Galamore selectively removed the casualties from the article. The article said:

Health Minister Firass Abiad said the vast majority of those treated in emergency rooms were in civilian clothing and their Hezbollah affiliation was unclear. Qassim Qassir, a Lebanese expert on Hezbollah, said the attacks mostly struck civilian workers, leaving its military wing largely unaffected. Reuters reported that, according to an unnamed Hezbollah official, 1,500 Hezbollah fighters were taken out of action due to injuries, with many blinded or having lost their hands.

Galamore removed the sentences about civilian casualties, both of which are attributed to named sources, but left the part about military casualties, attributed to an unnamed source. This looks like an WP:NPOV violation.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 15:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC) VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 15:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I explained my edits in detail in the edit summaries. Not all verifiable content should be included - it's a question of weight as I wrote in the summaries. Please be nicer and refer to content instead of editors, thank you. Galamore (talk) 15:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

But why are you selectively removing mention of civilian casualties only? Can you explain why it is UNDUE to mention civilian casualties of Israeli attacks, while it is DUE to mention military casualties? VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 15:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Can you further explain why unnamed sources should have more WP:WEIGHT than named sources, such as the Health Minister of Lebanon? VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 15:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

But there is mention of civilians. The article now says: "injured at least 3,500, including civilians." All the rest (statistics, expert views, ways of identifiying people) was totally undue and should go to the explosions article, it is way too detailed for this article. Galamore (talk) 15:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I think that edit is okay. We don't need that much detail on the pager explosions. Bitspectator ⛩️ 16:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@Bitspectator Would it also be then ok to remove the unnamed source for the military casualties too? AFAIK it is really only reported be Reuters.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 16:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I prefer to leave it in as it's relevant to the escalating tensions between Israel and Hezbollah (in describing the effect of an action of one party on another party) which is what the background is covering. Bitspectator ⛩️ 16:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I would also prefer to take it out as it's such a vague thing (an "unnamed source" is not quite the standard we need for an article such as this) but it has been used in other RSes. I think it isn't necessarily needed, since "including civilians" indicates some but not all are Hezbollah fighters. That's probably enough with vague sources involved. But it's not a hill I want to die on. I have reworded "including civilians" to "including many civilians". We could also go with "mostly civilians" instead, but that would add another ref to the sentence, so it may need rejigging a little to over-citing. Lewisguile (talk) 07:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

I would agree with Bitspectator. Such amount of details on the pager explosions really belongs at 2024 Lebanon pager explosions § Casualties, not here. — Sundostund mppria 17:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

WP:V and NPOV violation in the background again

I added the WP:V violation tag as there appears to be consensus that the claim that Hezbollah attacked Israel on October 8 is unverifiable. See Talk:2024_Hezbollah_headquarters_strike#What_happened_on_October_8 and at Talk:2024_Lebanon_pager_explosions#WP:V_violation. The consensus version of the background is here, that Bitspectator and I agreed to and is based on discussion with Lewisguile and Selfstudier here and here. People should really not be adding unverifiable information into an article that is on the main page.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 21:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Another option is to use the following as per my latest edit:

"A day after Hamas launched its 7 October 2023 attacks on Israel and Israel began bombing Gaza, Hezbollah joined the conflict, claiming solidarity with Palestine. Since then, Hezbollah and Israel have been involved in cross-border military exchanges that have displaced entire communities in Israel and Lebanon, with significant damage to buildings and land along the border." Refs as per 2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike#Background.

I've posted this on the other talk pages, too, for convenience. Lewisguile (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

The recent version uploaded a few hours ago is much better than this. It is much better aligned with that the leading sources say on the war's development between Israel and Hezbollah, and context from Iran's crucial role in the actions of Hezbollah, its leading proxy HaOfa (talk) 10:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

That one (which you have now reverted to) had some issues. I listed them briefly in my revert and also on the user's talk page (now deleted by them) here: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?diff=1248409627&markasread=327733742&markasreadwiki=enwiki&oldid=prev&title=User_talk

In the interests of avoiding an edit war, I have now edited the text to make it more acceptable. I have moved the op-ed down to Analysis and given it appropriate in-line attribution. Lewisguile (talk) 11:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Tagging @האופה and @EnfantDeLaVille re this. Take a look at the latest version:

In Background:

"The day after Hamas's 7 October 2023 attacks on Israel, Hezbollah joined the conflict with Israel, claiming solidarity with the "Palestinian resistance". Nasrallah said Hezbollah aimed to "strain Israel’s resources" by forcing it to fight on two fronts." (Then continues as before.)

And in Analysis:

"Writing in The New York Times, Farnaz Fassihi said the assassination of Nasrallah eliminated a key figure from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's inner circle, as Iran had spent forty years developing Hezbollah as a frontline defense against Israel. Fassihi said that Iran had, over time, activated a broader network of militant groups, including Hezbollah, to open multiple fronts against Israel, aiming to create regional chaos and pressure both the U.S. and Israel into negotiating a ceasefire with Hamas."

Hopefully this is more acceptable to everyone.

Lewisguile (talk) 12:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

@Lewisguile the source, which says "Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s leader, explained that the campaign was intended to strain Israel’s resources...Yet Nasrallah instead chose a middle-ground approach of incremental escalation". Also, importantly it doesn't seem to include Hezbollah's main reason that they've repeated stated as the reason for joining the conflict: to stop Israel's attacks on Gaza. They've explicitly laid that out as a ceasefire condition. Hezbollah's and Iran's messaging constantly revolves around the human death toll in Gaza. Hezbollah warned it would escalate "because Israel is increasing its aggression against civilians and killing more women and children".VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 01:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Feel free to add that in; I would support that. The source is an op-ed, and personally I wouldn't have relied on it at all, but its opinions do represent a significant subsection of people and someone else added that text in, so I was trying to iterate it rather than just reverting it. You can revert it if you'd prefer.

However, some of the things you mention about Hezbollah's aims are already in the background in one form or another. You don't need to refute the opinion in the Analysis section; just add other perspectives in there if you want. The reader can make their own conclusions. Lewisguile (talk) 07:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

The section already says "Hezbollah has stated it will continue attacking Israel until Israel halts its operations in Gaza.", so the issue should be fixed now then. Cambalachero (talk) 12:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Request to change 5,000 to 2,000 reflecting consensus of more recent sources

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

• What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}): Change the 3 instances of "5,000-pound" to "2,000-pound" (specifically in lead, infobox, and attack sections). Also should remove the associated "created in 2001" in the body as 1-ton bunker buster is older.

It is probably good idea to note in body that the exact munition is unconfirmed (see NYTimes reporting) but that's not part of this request just an option. If editor desires, can leave a reference to 5,000 pound bombs attributed to Elijah Magnier. But all the major media today are saying 2,000 (and if there are 80 bombs, probably a mix with some smaller but going further than claiming that 2,000 pound was used and ~80 bombs dropped is pure speculation).

• Why it should be changed: Almost ever major paper is now reporting the strike was likely with 2,000 pound bombs, including surpisingly one of the 2 citations used to say 5,000 pound bombs in the lead (https://apnews.com/article/lebanon-israel-hezbollah-airstrikes-suburb-617575d9c5d7c711bc02e7b81d2ba4ad). See also the latest report from NYTimes using released videos likely of the plane along with multiple expert opinions (https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/28/world/middleeast/israel-nasrallah-bunker-buster-bombs.html?smid=url-share), along with a consensus with AP news and every other source I've seen. The only place I'm seeing 5,000 pound is the Al Jazeera live blog only cited in the Wiki body, which attributes the statement to "Elijah Magnier, a military analyst". I could be missing another place but it's not presently in the article, and would contradict all major recent sources. If the statement is kept then it should definitely be POV to Magnier (and/or the Iranian FM) as it disagrees with the size quoted in most sources and also was a live-blog in-the-moment analysis (so no discredit to Magnier).

The refs below don't go with this, they seem to have been imported from some earlier section if someone wants to fix, sorry not sure how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scienceturtle1 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Do we even need that much detail? At least in the lede, that info could probably be removed altogether. If the majority of sources are now saying 2,000lb, then I'd be happy with that being changed. Lewisguile (talk) 08:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Scienceturtle1 (talk) 22:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

References

1. Chao-Fong, Léonie; Ambrose, Tom; Lowe, Yohannes; Belam, Martin (17 September 2024). "Lebanon explosions 'an extremely concerning escalation', says UN official, as Hezbollah threatens retaliation – as it happened". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 24 September 2024. Retrieved 20 September 2024.
2. "Despite Gaza battle, Hezbollah-Israel mutual deterrence holds". The Arab Weekly. Archived from the original on 21 May 2021. Retrieved 23 September 2024.
3. "Thousands of Iran-backed fighters offer to join Hezbollah in its fight against Israel". Naharnet. Archived from the original on 23 June 2024. Retrieved 23 September 2024.
4. "The exploding device attacks dealt a major but not crippling blow to Hezbollah, analysts say". AP News. 19 September 2024.
5. Bassam, Lailla; Mackenzie, James (25 September 2024). "Hezbollah's tunnels and flexible command weather Israel's deadly blows". Reuters.
6. Stroul, Dana (2024-09-23). "Israel and Hezbollah Are Escalating Toward Catastrophe". Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120. Retrieved 2024-09-29.
7. "Hezbollah bombards Israeli positions in disputed area along border with Syria's Golan Heights". AP News. 8 October 2023. Retrieved 27 September 2024.
8. "Hezbollah Fires on Israel After Several Members Killed in Shelling". Al Jazeera. 9 October 2023. Archived from the original on 1 November 2023. Retrieved 28 September 2024.

 Done ARandomName123 (talk) 18:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Flag salad "Reactions" section

As many of you know, most editors despise list-formatted "Reactions" sections, especially the flag icons. These sections should be converted into prose—not a bulleted (flagged) list. Sourcing should not be primary, such as tweets, and should have encyclopedic value. Abductive (reasoning) 00:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

I second the no flags thing, as there's actual policy on that, but the list reactions at least are easy to navigate. Putting them in prose can have weird effects when you group countries together. Lewisguile (talk) 08:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

As much as possible, relevant reactions should be limited to countries in the affected region and others that stand to be significantly affected, not some island nation in the middle of the Ocean. Borgenland (talk) 15:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

I suggest to include the reaction of the "crowds from the Idlib region of northwestern Syria" - https://themedialine.org/top-stories/while-opposing-israel-syrians-in-rebel-controlled-idlib-celebrate-nasrallahs-death/ - because these groups of people in this region have been directly affected by Hezbollah over the years, therefore their reaction is relevant. 1.145.26.98 (talk) 01:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

"some island nation in the middle of the Ocean" (meaning, a nation with no interests involved in the middle-east dispute) is unlikely to voice an official comment about this or any other related incident. There's no need to filter opinions ourselves: if they have something to say, the conflict is relevant to them for whatever reason. Government officials are not common X users, even if they use X to release comments, and everything they say, they say because it serves their national interests somehow. Cambalachero (talk) 12:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

The attack: More facts

I have no permission to edit. A few more facts from a reliable Israeli source (Hevrat HaHadashot and reuters):

1. It was F15i jet fighters.
2. The bombs number was 83 1-ton bombs, not 15.
3. His body was found with no injuries or wounds. according to some estimates the cause of his death was suffocation.

Source: . לידך, בלעדייך (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Do you have the direct link to Reuters confirming those details? That would probably be easier to use. I can't find a link in the article. Lewisguile (talk) 15:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

This is the reuters link, a partial source: . The other information by Nir Dvori, the military reporter of "Hevrat HaHadashot". He has his sources in the IDF. לידך, בלעדייך (talk) 15:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. This backs up that his body has been retrieved without any injuries. If any other links come through, feel free to add them here (though I'm sure others will add them too).a Lewisguile (talk) 15:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Have added that the body has been found. Thank you! Lewisguile (talk) 15:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

The first link in my original post backs up all. I didn't know that only sources in the english language are used. I remember i saw sources in many languages in English Misplaced Pages. לידך, בלעדייך (talk) 15:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

"Assassinated" or "killed"?

The article begins saying, in wiki voice, that the leader of Hezbola "was assassinated in an Israeli airstrike in Beirut." But should we say "assassinated" or "killed". An assassination is the murder of a public figure, and a murder is a killing that is both premeditated and unlawful. Public figure, premeditated, it fits. But unlawful? That's a can of worms that should better stay closed, in special in such a visible article (it's in the "In the News" section of the main page). There are plenty of arguments that may be mentioned as to why this death can be considered lawful or unlawful; but "killing" has no such subtle implications and can be used without any problem. I suggest changing "assassinated" to "killed". Cambalachero (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

There is an RM in progress and the consensus appears headed in the direction of assassinated atm. Selfstudier (talk) 15:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

The RM is about the article being focused on the air strikes or the death of the terrorist leader, not so much on the specific wording. And even if the article was kept in its current name, the wording is still used within it. Cambalachero (talk) 12:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Hidden image

In the Israel (Reactions) section, I've hidden an image that was added, as I wanted to find out what the consensus on this is. The file in question is:

This seems to me to be ripe for contention and issues, and less than the standard we'd want for an article like this. While it's an actual image from Israel, the pager included could be considered morbid and/or offensive to those who've lost family members, etc. Not to mention that some RSes have declared the attacks war crimes and terrorism, as noted in the article. It could also be seen as glorifying violence in general.

This same image has been added by the same user to multiple related pages, so it's possible similar discussions are ongoing elsewhere. If I've missed a discussion, please link me to it, so I can see if there's a prior consensus already.

So: should we unhide it, delete it, or what? Lewisguile (talk) 17:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

@Lewisguile: As per WP:NOTCENSORED, "being objectionable" is generally not sufficient grounds for the removal of content. Are there other reasons you believe the image should be removed? ARandomName123 (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

It's tangential to the article and better images could probably be used. I doubt it has consensus. And it could be considered WP:NPOV without proper context, especially since it doesn't really add anything. And while WP:NOTCENSORED does apply, this is also a designated contentious topic, so extra care should be taken.

But that's why I've opened this topic—so other editors can discuss it and so we can be as careful as the topic needs. There's also WP:NORUSH to add things anyway. Lewisguile (talk) 18:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

It isn’t relevant is the reason to remove it. nableezy - 22:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Concise as always, but right. Thank you. Lewisguile (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Squadron number in lede

The attack was conducted by the 69th squadron using f15i, not f16i as currently stated in the lede. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/09/29/israel-bomb-beirut-nasrallah-death/ 77.137.79.61 (talk) 21:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 September 2024

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at 2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike. (edit · history · last · links · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y". The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

First paragraph sentence including “Conducted by the Israeli Air Force's 119th Squadron using F-16I fighters” should read “F-15I fighters” instead. The plane ID is incorrect. CNYnative (talk) 01:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

"intended target"

The term "intended target" is used in the sentence, "Media reports confirmed that Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah was the intended target of the airstrike."

This is redundant. When referring to a target, intention is understood. There is no such thing as an unintended target.

Recommend deleting the word, "intended" thus: "Media reports confirmed that Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah was the target of the airstrike" 67.188.128.95 (talk) 05:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done Nythar (💬-🍀) 06:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).

• Misplaced Pages In the news articles
• C-Class Israel-related articles
• Low-importance Israel-related articles
• WikiProject Israel articles
• C-Class Lebanon articles
• Low-importance Lebanon articles
• WikiProject Lebanon articles
• C-Class military history articles
• C-Class Asian military history articles
• Asian military history task force articles
• C-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
• Middle Eastern military history task force articles
• C-Class Post-Cold War articles
• Post-Cold War task force articles
• C-Class Death articles
• Low-importance Death articles
• Requested moves
• Misplaced Pages extended-confirmed-protected edit requests