| Revision as of 18:12, 23 September 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,661 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Sitush/Archive 33) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:32, 6 October 2024 edit undo2409:4085:d10:541b:b9ba:e2d2:9898:81e (talk) →Thank you for your kindness: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| Hello, I hope you don’t mind me leaving a question here if that’s all right. I wanted to ask something that you’ve probably answered in the past but unfortunately, I couldn’t find anything in my search. Does ] apply to all raj sources in general or is it specific to citations about the caste system during that era? I’ve seen conflicting opinions on this. I’ve read that Jadunath Sarkar is generally considered outdated for example, although he was a military historiographer. That made me assume that all sources from the raj era are generally considered outdated, not just ones focused on the caste system. But I can’t be too sure, so I wanted to ask. @] ] (]) 05:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC) | Hello, I hope you don’t mind me leaving a question here if that’s all right. I wanted to ask something that you’ve probably answered in the past but unfortunately, I couldn’t find anything in my search. Does ] apply to all raj sources in general or is it specific to citations about the caste system during that era? I’ve seen conflicting opinions on this. I’ve read that Jadunath Sarkar is generally considered outdated for example, although he was a military historiographer. That made me assume that all sources from the raj era are generally considered outdated, not just ones focused on the caste system. But I can’t be too sure, so I wanted to ask. @] ] (]) 05:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Thank you for your kindness == | |||
| Many years back. ] (]) 11:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:32, 6 October 2024
 | An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be arsed to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Caste promotion account
Hello, please look at this user he is editing majority particular caste related articles and is heavily using doubtful references. He is Rajput promoting account only. Check his contributions.
War article without any authentic source
Please once see this Battle of Mandan page. Not a single source looks credible. 2 out of 3 the sources are even low rated on Google books and one is by a caste historian.
References
1) Hooja, Rima (2006). A History of Rajasthan. Rupa and company.
2) Sinh, Ranbir (2001). History of Shekhawats. p. 280.
3) Meharda, B.L. Territory, Polity, and Status- A Study of Shekhawats.
Here 1st source is from some Rupa company, other 2 are from caste writers not credible historians.
This whole article is a propoganda against reality. Please User:Sitush check it.
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Sitush! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC) |  |
Howdy
Sitush--how are you doing, old friend? We're all dinosaurs now, and we were so smart and cute when we first got here. At least I was. If you're around, and you have a moment, maybe you can have a look at this. These are odd edits, I think. Thanks, and take care-- Drmies (talk) 15:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind: I saw reason to check, and boom, there we go! Drmies (talk) 15:39, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Question about WP:RAJ.
Hello, I hope you don’t mind me leaving a question here if that’s all right. I wanted to ask something that you’ve probably answered in the past but unfortunately, I couldn’t find anything in my search. Does User:Sitush/CasteSources apply to all raj sources in general or is it specific to citations about the caste system during that era? I’ve seen conflicting opinions on this. I’ve read that Jadunath Sarkar is generally considered outdated for example, although he was a military historiographer. That made me assume that all sources from the raj era are generally considered outdated, not just ones focused on the caste system. But I can’t be too sure, so I wanted to ask. @Sitush Someguywhosbored (talk) 05:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your kindness
Many years back. 2409:4085:D10:541B:B9BA:E2D2:9898:81E (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)