Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:49, 13 October 2024

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

User:Symphony_Regalia

• Symphony_Regalia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

User was recently site blocked indefinitely from the Japanese wiki for brute forcing edits without consulting the Talk page first (this disruptive cross wiki activity started roughly a month after their initial edits on the EN counterpart), sockpuppetry, harassing JP editors who were against their behaviour with false accusations, as well as maliciously reverting edits of said editors (which coincidentally happened during the edit block request).

This user was under the scrutiny of an RfC and an edit block request, both of which were ignored by said user, except for the socks. User was continuing their edits on the English pages during the duration of both incidences. This user engages in aggressive POV-pushing and does not engage in Talks nor do they present information when pressed, as noted here, here and here. I would like to know what measures could be taken against this user. 14.192.210.103 (talk) 23:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

This IP user is an involved editor spreading false allegations. A CheckUser was performed and the sock puppet allegations were not substantiated.

I was blocked based on a comment request where only 3 people gave input, but I believe that to be for reasons of offending Japanese sensibilities. On Japanese Misplaced Pages I have had a target on my back for a while for attempting to bring the Nanking Massacre article in line with the English counterpart (on Japanese Misplaced Pages the Nanking Massacre is named "The Nanking Incident" and many of the genocide allegations are scrubbed from the article).

None of this is relevant as I haven't edited on Japanese Misplaced Pages in a while. Symphony Regalia (talk) 00:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

The last paragraph of the CU request by a JP admin mentions "an abnormal amount of logins within a short timeframe" for those accounts, which was the basis of the block by another JP admin. It should be noted that the socks were created days later after your initial edit on the subject, all of which were involved in the same subject matter.

You were requested for comments on both the RfC and the edit block request to defend yourself, would you kindly explain why you chose not to do so? 14.192.210.103 (talk) 01:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Sock complaint about Sevens Football

• Sevens Football (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Sevens Football Association (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Seven-a-side football (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

One more sock-attacked page "sevens football" needs deletion, see my log Cenderabird (talk) 16:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

You are insisting that Sevens Football should be a redirect to Sevens Football Association and not be its own article. Has this been discussed anywhere? I notice that some of the past editors of Sevens Football are now blocked but I'm not well-informed about any sock issues that may exist. You could link to any SPI reports. EdJohnston (talk) 17:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

I put three months of semiprotection on Sevens Football Association. EdJohnston (talk) 00:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Also can this page get protected please:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Super_League_Kerala# 93.143.217.6 (talk) 13:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Conundrum

Hey Ed, hope you are doing well. I have a conundrum.

I have been unable to find this journal article:

• Jeannin, Jean-Paul. "Jean de Luxembourg, seigneur de Haubourdin, dit le Bâtard de Saint-Pol." Revue Historique, vol. 147, 1923, pp. 145-175.
  

I checked Jstor more ways than I care to relate and found nothing. Revue Historique link

I have also been unable to find any mention of Jean, Lord of Haubourdin, Bastard of Luxembourg / Bastard of Saint-Pol, or Hennequin in this book:

• Allmand, Christopher. The Hundred Years War: England and France at War c.1300–1450. Cambridge University Press, 1988, no page number given
  

It is searchable/viewable via Misplaced Pages's library link with Cambridge

AND, I have been unable to verify the existance of this book:

• Browning, Reed. The Duke of Burgundy: Philip the Good. G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1978, no page number given
  

World Cat has no record of it
Isbn search brings back weird stuff or books by Richard Vaughan and William R. Tyler

Would you, or anyone reading this, be willing to do a search for this information? --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello KB. We have an article at Jean de Luxembourg (1400-1466). Why not explain on the article's talk page what you're looking for? I looked at Revue Historique, and their contents seem to be available through JSTOR, including 1923. Is your concern that there is no article in the Revue matching the reference? If Jean fought in the Hundred Years War there ought to be coverage. There is an actual historian named Reed Browning but I couldn't find a book by him about the Duke of Burgundy EdJohnston (talk) 17:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Some of these references were added by User:TorreyTree within the last few days. You could ask them. EdJohnston (talk) 18:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

• "Why not explain on the article's talk page what you're looking for?"

The majority of editors don't check much less respond to queries on article talk pages.

• "Is your concern that there is no article in the Revue matching the reference?"

My concern is I can't find the article used as a reference in the Revue Historique journals. I was hoping that I had simply missed it. As for the book by Reed Browning, I was hoping I was missing something there as well. It would appear not. I will inquire with TorreyTree for further information. Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Check

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=FK_Mlad%C3%A1_Boleslav&diff=prev&oldid=1244608500

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/User:FromCzech (he breaks the above rule by supporting sock-made edit...)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Bans_apply_to_all_editing,_good_or_bad 93.143.217.6 (talk) 02:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Updates & Schedule

Administrator Elections | Updates & Schedule
Administrator elections are in the WMF Trust & Safety SecurePoll calendar and are all set to proceed. We plan to use the following schedule: Oct 8 – Oct 14: Candidate sign-up Oct 22 – Oct 24: Discussion phase Oct 25 – Oct 31: SecurePoll voting phase If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please post at Misplaced Pages talk:Administrator elections. If you are interested in helping out, please post at Misplaced Pages talk:Administrator elections § Ways to help. There are many redlinked subpages that can be created.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.

Here is the schedule:

• October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
• October 22–24 - Discussion phase
• October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

• The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
• Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Misplaced Pages:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
• The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
• The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
• Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Slip-up regarding topic ban

This message comes to inform you that I slipped up with regards to the topic ban. During the course of visiting the Nikolai Tikhonov page, I noticed there was no date for the lede image and then (as a matter of habit) edited the infobox to reflect that the photo depicted Tikhonov in 1985. Almost immediately afterward, it occurred to me that such an edit was in violation of the topic ban and I promptly reverted said edit. You'll find that the timestamp of such edits reflects this.

Everything I have just said to you is 100% true and is not intended to justify a calculated attempt to bypass the topic ban that was recently opposed. If possible, please cut me a break regarding this mistake on my part in this one instance. Emiya1980 (talk) 02:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) The problems with this user are certainly broader compared to this lenient sanction. One needs to simply take a look at Leonid Brezhnev article for understanding that. Capitals00 (talk) 03:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Emiya1980, thanks for your note. I won't be taking any action on your slip-up myself. EdJohnston (talk) 03:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC)