| Revision as of 04:20, 15 October 2024 view sourceCrboyer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users48,300 edits Reverting edit(s) by Yammla (talk) to rev. 1251246397 by Crboyer: Vandalism (from contribs) (RW 16.1)Tags: RW Undo Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:21, 15 October 2024 view source Yammla (talk | contribs)8 edits You Need To Hear ItTags: Undo RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
| :Done. I hope a lot of this will settle down after a certain election in November. --] (]) 11:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC) | :Done. I hope a lot of this will settle down after a certain election in November. --] (]) 11:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::Perhaps those North Koreans are onto something. /s ] (]) 11:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC) | ::Perhaps those North Koreans are onto something. /s ] (]) 11:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == F{{text|UC}}K YOU FOR TAKING MY USERNAME == | |||
| HEY YOU STOLE MY USERNAME YOU B{{text|ITC}}H A{{text|SS}} B{{text|ITC}}H ] (]) 04:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:21, 15 October 2024
 | Yamla was away on vacation from 20240913 to 20240920 and may not have responded swiftly to queries. |  |
 Archives |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Where can I test unblock requests?
It is not allowed in user sandbox so where can I test unblock requests? 203.45.2.111 (talk) 19:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- You can use the preview functionality, but please don't save them. Note also this indicates you plan to need to request an unblock, which is really not a good sign. --Yamla (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages should have private pages then 203.45.2.111 (talk) 19:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but it doesn't. --Yamla (talk) 19:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages should have private pages then 203.45.2.111 (talk) 19:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Misplaced Pages talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
Miscellaneous
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Ovary (botany)
Hi Yamla, I noticed on Nepenthes bokorensis that you reverted an IP user, and changed a link to Ovary (botany) back to just Ovary. I'm not sure what the IP use is/was doing in general (I think they might now be blocked) but it looks like there might be a few other similar reverts which now point to the animal ovary article rather than the (correct) plant one. I've corrected the link on the above N. bokorensis article but didn't want to go unrv-ing a load of admin rvs without discussion. Best, YFB ¿ 11:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- You, an editor in good standing, are very welcome to revert any of those rollbacks from me if you believe it appropriate. I was bulk-reverting under WP:RBI from a banned editor known for, among other things, introducing bad information to articles. There's a limited amount of additional information I can provide here due to privacy concerns, by hopefully that answers your question. Unrv-ing a load of my (admin) rv's would be perfectly fine here, so long as you check the edit is correct, and you'll receive thanks rather than criticism from me! --Yamla (talk) 11:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Great, thought that was probably the context but always worth checking. Thanks for the quick reply, I'll take a look through the history and clean up any others :) YFB ¿ 11:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material, unexplained removal of maintenance tags, advertising or promotion
Hello, Yamla. Can you check for edits from people who are causing Misplaced Pages to lose its warning system? This is because an administrator has rolled back edits from the person using the IP address range 2001:1388:A44:0:0:0:0:0 and 2001:1388:A45:0:0:0:0:0 multiple times
Can you investigate this anomaly and revert the last disruptive edit? IP address 2001:1388:A44:5700:28FE:5648:2A79:8595 The administrator has verified that it is the same as the user. @Rosalinares1 permanently blocked The first account was blocked for causing harassment, writing content without references, and removing maintenance tags on the article. Nine (singer) may have a conflict of interest. The content is from a fan's point of view. New accounts are created, multiple accounts are misused. After the administrator warned and rolled back the edit, it returned to adding a large amount of content without any references. Delete maintenance tags without explanation or correct them multiple times.
After checking the edit history Talking with system viewers on Misplaced Pages in Thai and English, the answer is that they are fans, close people, organizations, or camps of Nine (singer) adding content that shouldn't be on Misplaced Pages. There are reminders and suggestions on how to write every time. But still use the IP address to do the same thing more than 40 times. All of this was added in one big piece with no source. Most of the time it doesn't stand out. may have a conflict of interest (COI).
Many IP addresses come from the same person. 2 IP address ranges 2001:1388:A44:0:0:0:0:0 and 2001:1388:A45:0:0:0:0:0 Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material, unexplained removal of maintenance tags on Nine (singer) All edits from the IP address found to be the same person. Harassing and deleting content in other articles which had administrators warn and rollback more than 42 disruptive edits Found the latest edit, redo it. 2001:1388:A44:5700:28FE:5648:2A79:8595 2001:1388:A44:E5F7:24AC:CE3C:BE06:1E4A 2001:1388:A44:EDDB:98F3:C8BE:82C6:175D
Repeatedly adding unsourced content and deleting maintenance tags by correcting them and not explained in the article Nine (singer) in terms of being a fan club Due to adding content to live broadcast activities to sell products Duplicate content is added which is not important. As with most of the content in this article
The history of adding content is clearly the perspective of fans. Not outstanding There is no reference source. Much of the content in these sections seems to be little known events and awards. Likely of interest only to a small audience. Much of it should be removed: - Brand activity is a live broadcast selling products on Tmall and Taobao. - Cover version is a general cover of a song. The source of the YouTube link is from a fan account, not an official account.
The entire article was edited by the same person, unexplained removal of maintenance tags, and recently used a new IP address to add a lot of unsourced content. The history reveals many IP addresses from this person who has been harassing for a long time.
Edit history Nine (singer) has only one person, IP addresses starting with 2001:1388:A45 and 2001:1388:A44 all are the same person The edits will be made in the same way, namely adding information to the article without the source in Nine (singer) and deleting and disturbing other articles. which always has admin rollback This person made repeated changes with new IP addresses like this.
Administrators address disruptive IP address user behavior issues. Continuously adding unsourced content to Nine (singer) A single person from Lima, Peru, used the IP address to reverse an update notification. Unexplained deletion of maintenance tags Modifications were not performed according to the maintenance tag instructions. Please disturb other articles as well. repeated addition of unsourced content I think examining a person is difficult. This person from Lima, Peru uses a different IP address every time they resolve. Every time delete and add information to another article. will be reversed Then edit again with the new IP address.
This person created information in the Nine (singer) article and also caused mischief in other articles. Add information without references Administrators always roll back edits that this person deleted on other articles. Editing that disturbs another article and edited and added information only to the article Nine (singer) The person using all IP addresses in this Nine (singer) article is the same person who removed the maintenance tag without editing it.
The person using all the IP addresses I attached is the same person. I'm only giving examples because there are many. The entire article Nine (singer) has an IP address from the same person from Lima, Peru, but the IP address in the update is different every time the information is added. This person deleted the maintenance tag notice. Delete without correcting Most articles lack references. As I looked at the article's history, Nine (singer) has been doing this for a long time, but no user has come to check on this person. MeetHoneyBee (talk) 19:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- No, I am not the right person to tackle this. If you think there's a violation of WP:SOCK, please use WP:SPI. If you think there's vandalism, please use WP:AIV. --Yamla (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Lauren Chen
Hiya! Can you protect the article Lauren Chen for a bit longer? They are not going to stop. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 04:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done. I hope a lot of this will settle down after a certain election in November. --Yamla (talk) 11:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps those North Koreans are onto something. /s Polygnotus (talk) 11:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
FUCK YOU FOR TAKING MY USERNAME
HEY YOU STOLE MY USERNAME YOU BITCH ASS BITCH Yammla (talk) 04:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)