Misplaced Pages

:Good article reassessment/Dr. Mario/1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:56, 14 October 2024 editSalvidrim! (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors28,654 edits r← Previous edit Revision as of 19:12, 16 October 2024 edit undoMFTP Dan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,378 edits →Dr. Mario: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
*'''Note''' The version when it was a GAN had no uncited things. So the question is, would it be impossible to revert the article to that state and then update as necessary or would it need more major work? ] (]) 05:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC) *'''Note''' The version when it was a GAN had no uncited things. So the question is, would it be impossible to revert the article to that state and then update as necessary or would it need more major work? ] (]) 05:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
:*It's probably not very desirable to wipe out a decade's worth of edits with a wave of a wand. <span style="background:black;padding:1px 4px">]&nbsp;]</span> 15:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC) :*It's probably not very desirable to wipe out a decade's worth of edits with a wave of a wand. <span style="background:black;padding:1px 4px">]&nbsp;]</span> 15:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
:*:Looking at the originally listed version in 2011, I don't think that would even be sufficient. I'm not sure that version should have even been listed as was (though I am not saying it should have failed instead). That version also has a completely uncited paragraph in '''Legacy'''. Perhaps Salvidrim! can correct me if I am displaying ignorance of the rules working differently here, since he is the original nominator. ] <sup> ] </sup> 19:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:12, 16 October 2024

Dr. Mario

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result pending

The "Legacy" section is my biggest concern: the first paragraph is uncited, while the rest of the paragraphs are an assortment of appearances in other media. There are also some uncited statements in other parts of the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

  • Note The version when it was a GAN had no uncited things. So the question is, would it be impossible to revert the article to that state and then update as necessary or would it need more major work? ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
  • It's probably not very desirable to wipe out a decade's worth of edits with a wave of a wand. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 15:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
    Looking at the originally listed version in 2011, I don't think that would even be sufficient. I'm not sure that version should have even been listed as was (though I am not saying it should have failed instead). That version also has a completely uncited paragraph in Legacy. Perhaps Salvidrim! can correct me if I am displaying ignorance of the rules working differently here, since he is the original nominator. mftp dan 19:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Category: