| Revision as of 03:58, 22 October 2024 editParadox38 (talk | contribs)85 edits Made sections to serve as article skeleton.Tag: Visual edit | Revision as of 06:51, 23 October 2024 edit undoParadox38 (talk | contribs)85 edits →Mechanism: Added a note to practical considerations.Tag: Visual editNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Recategorization changes the salience of group identities. Self-categorization theory says that individuals usually have one category salient at a time, and making one identity salient changes their behavior. | Recategorization changes the salience of group identities. Self-categorization theory says that individuals usually have one category salient at a time, and making one identity salient changes their behavior. | ||
| Ingroup bias is a thing. Increase the size of the ingroup to reduce bias against the outgroups, who are now part of the ingroup. | Ingroup bias is a thing. Increase the size of the ingroup to reduce bias against the outgroups, who are now part of the ingroup. | ||
| === Single and Dual-Identity Recategorization === | === Single and Dual-Identity Recategorization === | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| === Practical Considerations (problems) === | === Practical Considerations (problems) === | ||
| Recategorization is not a cure-all. It can be difficult to recategorize people, especially single single-identity recategorizations must try to overpower categorizations already present, which often have been ingrained over years by systems that continue to make the original categorization salient. Multiple-identity recategorization also has the potential to heighten tensions by making the source of intergroup tensions more salient. Attaches to ingroup projection model(?) wherein subgroups project their values onto the superordinate group and judge members of that group (both within and beyond their subgroup) by those projected values. This is a means of making your ingroup's values prototypical for and normative of the superordinate group, which has benefits (cite "it's good when your group is prototypical"). | Recategorization is not a cure-all. It can be difficult to recategorize people, especially single single-identity recategorizations must try to overpower categorizations already present, which often have been ingrained over years by systems that continue to make the original categorization salient. Multiple-identity recategorization also has the potential to heighten tensions by making the source of intergroup tensions more salient. Attaches to ingroup projection model(?) wherein subgroups project their values onto the superordinate group and judge members of that group (both within and beyond their subgroup) by those projected values. This is a means of making your ingroup's values prototypical for and normative of the superordinate group, which has benefits (cite "it's good when your group is prototypical"). | ||
| Furthermore, reduced ingroup identity has its own effects, including X, Y, and Z. (At least note the reduction in support for collective action, depending on recategorization) | |||
| == Criticism == | == Criticism == | ||
Revision as of 06:51, 23 October 2024
In social psychology, recategorization is a change to the identity or identities with which an individual or group identifies. When deliberately encouraged, recategorization is most often used to broaden the scope of an identity or make a more inclusive identity salient, in order to reduce bias.
 | This template is not to be used in article space. This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Misplaced Pages contribution. If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
History
Gaertner, Mann, Murrell, Dovidio
Mechanism
Self-Categorization Theory
Recategorization changes the salience of group identities. Self-categorization theory says that individuals usually have one category salient at a time, and making one identity salient changes their behavior.
Ingroup bias is a thing. Increase the size of the ingroup to reduce bias against the outgroups, who are now part of the ingroup.
Single and Dual-Identity Recategorization
Single-identity recategorization
Dual-identity recategorization (or multi-identity recategorization) retains the original identity
Dual identity recategorization functions through cross-categorization or hierarchical(?) categorization. Cross-categorization makes use of identities orthogonal to the identities unrelated to the original categorization, e.g., Black and White students on a college campus recategorizing into Students who go to X College.
hierarchical(?) categorization works by maintaining the groups in the current categorization as subgroups belonging to a superordinate group. An example of this could be fans of different baseball teams uniting as baseball fans, or fans of different sports uniting as sports fans, or members of different political parties uniting as patriots.
Practical Considerations (problems)
Recategorization is not a cure-all. It can be difficult to recategorize people, especially single single-identity recategorizations must try to overpower categorizations already present, which often have been ingrained over years by systems that continue to make the original categorization salient. Multiple-identity recategorization also has the potential to heighten tensions by making the source of intergroup tensions more salient. Attaches to ingroup projection model(?) wherein subgroups project their values onto the superordinate group and judge members of that group (both within and beyond their subgroup) by those projected values. This is a means of making your ingroup's values prototypical for and normative of the superordinate group, which has benefits (cite "it's good when your group is prototypical").
Furthermore, reduced ingroup identity has its own effects, including X, Y, and Z. (At least note the reduction in support for collective action, depending on recategorization)
Criticism
Rwandan Recategorization Policy
starting in 1994 Rwanda started passing policies to encourage single-identity recategorization.
Consistent with ingroup projection model(?)
See Also (or incorporate somehow)
Cross Categorization
Multiple Categorization
Social Projection
Ingroup projection model