| Revision as of 09:20, 9 February 2023 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,118 edits →Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:57, 23 October 2024 edit undoAirshipJungleman29 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors44,327 edits 15.ai listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper)Next edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| You are receiving this message because you were a ] on at least one article that is part of ] or you signed up for messages. An ] closed with consensus to delist this group of ]s for ] and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent ] and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review ] for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found ]. Questions or comments can be made at ]. You can opt in or out of further messages at ]. ] (]) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC) | You are receiving this message because you were a ] on at least one article that is part of ] or you signed up for messages. An ] closed with consensus to delist this group of ]s for ] and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent ] and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review ] for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found ]. Questions or comments can be made at ]. You can opt in or out of further messages at ]. ] (]) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:SandyGeorgia@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Good_article_reassessment/February_2023/GA_reviewer_MMStargets&oldid=1138372475 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:SandyGeorgia@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Good_article_reassessment/February_2023/GA_reviewer_MMStargets&oldid=1138372475 --> | ||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 09:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:57, 23 October 2024
Lebot confused
On my Talk Page it just notified me Alexander S. Wolcott failed GAN. However, it looks like you promoted the article to Good Article. mmmmmmmm--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Here's something to motivate you and to let you know that your contributions are appreciated. Keep it going! Volten001 04:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC) |
- My first barnstar :) Thank you kindly! SirGallantThe4th (talk) 19:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
AfD Discussion
It appears that an article that you approved for GA status, 15.ai, is being nominated for deletion. Would you consider chiming in the discussion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HackerKnownAs (talk • contribs) 19:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Sure. I’ll take a look. SirGallantThe4th (talk) 20:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Misplaced Pages:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for 15.ai
15.ai has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)