| Revision as of 18:10, 14 November 2006 editHairwizard91 (talk | contribs)1,935 editsm moved Talk:Three Gojoseon to Talk:Three Confederate States of Gojoseon← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:47, 24 April 2007 edit undoJtm71 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users667 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ::Then provide a mainstream work on Korean history that supports it. Otherwise there is no reason for it to be taken seriously on Misplaced Pages. -- ] 13:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | ::Then provide a mainstream work on Korean history that supports it. Otherwise there is no reason for it to be taken seriously on Misplaced Pages. -- ] 13:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::Until there is a research in school historian, it is myth. Myth can be also taken in Wiki.--] 13:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | :::Until there is a research in school historian, it is myth. Myth can be also taken in Wiki.--] 13:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Then classify the contents as a part of the whole story. ] 09:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:47, 24 April 2007
Template:Korean requires
|hangul= parameter.
whoa.. i've never imagined 고조선 as a confederacy of three large empires. 물론 고조선은 상당히 강하고 아주 크게 발전했다는 말은 들어봤다만.. 이 패이지의 있는 지도는 처음 보는것이다. 근대, 이게 실제란 말인가??
- Presumably not, or some references would be supplied. Seems like original research to me. -- Visviva 08:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- hmmm...SinChaeho was a great man, but he died a long long long time ago. He is also not without controversy -- it might not be so good to rely on the work of this scholar exclusively. Perhaps their is more recent research on this topic? I think there is...in fact there's mountain of academic research available in big bookstores. Any perusal of bookshelves at Kyobo in Seoul or Yonggwang Deoseo in Busan can tell us that. Sin Chaeho?!?
Sounds like fabricated story to me. Just replace the word Han (韓/한) on the left with Joseon (朝鮮/조선) on the right....
- Samhan (Three Han) --> Three Gojoseon
The ones on the right are just imaginary nations, and should be treated as such.--Endroit 07:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Read Joseon Sanggosa. this is not fabrication. If you read 'Shiji, you can find the three. --Hairwizard91 10:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Then provide a mainstream work on Korean history that supports it. Otherwise there is no reason for it to be taken seriously on Misplaced Pages. -- Visviva 13:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Until there is a research in school historian, it is myth. Myth can be also taken in Wiki.--Hairwizard91 13:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Then provide a mainstream work on Korean history that supports it. Otherwise there is no reason for it to be taken seriously on Misplaced Pages. -- Visviva 13:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Then classify the contents as a part of the whole story. Jtm71 09:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)