Revision as of 20:40, 14 November 2024 editBobfrombrockley (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users29,547 edits →Sourcing content from Iranian channels: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:43, 14 November 2024 edit undoM.Bitton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users54,621 edits →Removed sourced comments/Failed verificationNext edit → | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:::::::::It doesn't matter one bit who added the unsourced claim, what matters is that it was challenged and you restored it while adding a source that doesn't support it. I don't need to mention ], so my question is: are you going to self-revert? 20:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC) ] (]) 20:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | :::::::::It doesn't matter one bit who added the unsourced claim, what matters is that it was challenged and you restored it while adding a source that doesn't support it. I don't need to mention ], so my question is: are you going to self-revert? 20:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC) ] (]) 20:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::It’s uncontroversial, true and long-standing. Isn’t it better to add a source rather than remove the content? (And the content I added, which you also removed, was straightforwardly verifiable, so no I don’t see a reason for that to go either.) ] (]) 20:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | ::::::::::It’s uncontroversial, true and long-standing. Isn’t it better to add a source rather than remove the content? (And the content I added, which you also removed, was straightforwardly verifiable, so no I don’t see a reason for that to go either.) ] (]) 20:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::The only that is true is the fact that you violated ] and ] and ]. I'm done wasting my time with this nonsense, now that you made clear that you have no intention of self-reverting. ] (]) 20:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
===Antisemitism=== | ===Antisemitism=== | ||
Line 52: | Line 53: | ||
:I have no idea why you divided the ongoing discussion into subsections, but in any case, so let's put the "allegations of antisemitism" aside and concentrate on the serious issues that have been raised above. ] (]) 19:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | :I have no idea why you divided the ongoing discussion into subsections, but in any case, so let's put the "allegations of antisemitism" aside and concentrate on the serious issues that have been raised above. ] (]) 19:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Antisemitism is far more serious than the more trivial issues above. There’s a huge amount of verified material about it in the body. It should be in the lead. ] (]) 20:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | ::Antisemitism is far more serious than the more trivial issues above. There’s a huge amount of verified material about it in the body. It should be in the lead. ] (]) 20:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::Your self-serving opinion is irrelevant. ] (]) 20:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{Reflist-talk}} | {{Reflist-talk}} |
Revision as of 20:43, 14 November 2024
Al-Manar was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removed sourced comments/Failed verification
Iran and soft power
This was removed, but I don't understand why:
It is supported by the Iranian state, which uses it as part of its soft power strategies in the Arab-speaking world.
The quote is in the note - it says exactly this. BobFromBrockley (talk) 18:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- No, the quoted text doesn't support what you added, all it says is "currently supports several Arabic-speaking TV channels like Al-Alam TV and Al-Manar". M.Bitton (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, “supported”, literally the word I used. BobFromBrockley (talk) 18:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- No, there is a huge difference between what the source says and what's quoted in green. M.Bitton (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, “supported”, literally the word I used. BobFromBrockley (talk) 18:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Sourcing content from Iranian channels
Why do you keep inserting text that fails verification? I'm referring to this edit. M.Bitton (talk) 18:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
@Bobfrombrockley: It also sources stories from Iranian news agencies such as FARS and IRNA
which part of the source that you added supports this? M.Bitton (talk) 18:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wasn’t in the source that I added; it was in the source that was already there. I only added the bit about the formal cooperation agreement BobFromBrockley (talk) 18:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- You added the content (see diff), so I'm asking you: which part of the source that you added supports the content that you added? M.Bitton (talk) 18:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I re-added material which I assumed you removed because you thought it was linked to the citation I added rather than the citation already there. BobFromBrockley (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- But you are correct; it was not in the source that was there previously. I stand corrected. I have added a cn tag. BobFromBrockley (talk) 19:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- You don't add unsourced content and cn tag it (especially when the content has been challenged). I suggest you self-revert. M.Bitton (talk) M.Bitton (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Again: It’s long standing content, not content I added. BobFromBrockley (talk) 20:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- You added it (I provided the diff), therefore, you own it. Are you going to self-revert? M.Bitton (talk) 20:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't understand what that means. The claim was added 11 years ago by Redhanker, with a primary source.
- It's obviously true; we just need a secondary source for it, or use the primary source as it's an uncontroversial (one would think at least) claim that would fall under ABOUTSELF if we returned to the original source. BobFromBrockley (talk) 20:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter one bit who added the unsourced claim, what matters is that it was challenged and you restored it while adding a source that doesn't support it. I don't need to mention WP:V, so my question is: are you going to self-revert? 20:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC) M.Bitton (talk) 20:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- It’s uncontroversial, true and long-standing. Isn’t it better to add a source rather than remove the content? (And the content I added, which you also removed, was straightforwardly verifiable, so no I don’t see a reason for that to go either.) BobFromBrockley (talk) 20:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter one bit who added the unsourced claim, what matters is that it was challenged and you restored it while adding a source that doesn't support it. I don't need to mention WP:V, so my question is: are you going to self-revert? 20:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC) M.Bitton (talk) 20:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- You added it (I provided the diff), therefore, you own it. Are you going to self-revert? M.Bitton (talk) 20:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Again: It’s long standing content, not content I added. BobFromBrockley (talk) 20:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- You don't add unsourced content and cn tag it (especially when the content has been challenged). I suggest you self-revert. M.Bitton (talk) M.Bitton (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- But you are correct; it was not in the source that was there previously. I stand corrected. I have added a cn tag. BobFromBrockley (talk) 19:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I re-added material which I assumed you removed because you thought it was linked to the citation I added rather than the citation already there. BobFromBrockley (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- You added the content (see diff), so I'm asking you: which part of the source that you added supports the content that you added? M.Bitton (talk) 18:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Antisemitism
There is loads of sourced material in the body on antisemitism, but it's now missing fom the lead. We have so much in the body that is verifiable, this has enough weight for lead, with or without the source that was there before. BobFromBrockley (talk) 19:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea why you divided the ongoing discussion into subsections, but in any case, so let's put the "allegations of antisemitism" aside and concentrate on the serious issues that have been raised above. M.Bitton (talk) 19:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Antisemitism is far more serious than the more trivial issues above. There’s a huge amount of verified material about it in the body. It should be in the lead. BobFromBrockley (talk) 20:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Your self-serving opinion is irrelevant. M.Bitton (talk) 20:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Antisemitism is far more serious than the more trivial issues above. There’s a huge amount of verified material about it in the body. It should be in the lead. BobFromBrockley (talk) 20:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
References
- “Iran has always aspired to maintain a strong presence in the Arab world to defy its regional rivals, using a variety of soft and sharp power tools. In addition, Iran has supported several TV stations to achieve its soft power ambitions in the Arab world. Iran currently supports several Arabic-speaking TV channels like Al-Alam TV and Al-Manar in addition to many other outlets.” Elswah, Mona and Alimardani, Mahsa. "Propaganda Chimera: Unpacking the Iranian Perception Information Operations in the Arab World" Open Information Science, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, pp. 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2020-0122, p.163
- "EXCLUSIVE-Iran-Based Political Influence Operation: Bigger, Persistent, Global". Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. 29 August 2018. Retrieved 14 November 2024.
- Former good article nominees
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class Lebanon articles
- Low-importance Lebanon articles
- WikiProject Lebanon articles
- B-Class Islam-related articles
- Low-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- B-Class Palestine-related articles
- Mid-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- B-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles