Misplaced Pages

Talk:Nick McKenzie: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:56, 19 November 2024 editTarnishedPath (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers17,692 edits Undid revision 1257152195 by TarnishedPath (talk) actually I think print journalism is more accurate.Tags: Undo Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 07:54, 20 November 2024 edit undoTarnishedPath (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers17,692 edits remove until a later date as a reviewer has just picked up my nomination on another articleTags: Manual revert RevertedNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|10:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)|nominator='']''<sup>]</sup>|page=1|subtopic=Magazines and print journalism|status=|note=|shortdesc=Australian investigative journalist}}
{{talk header}} {{talk header}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=blp}} {{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=blp}}

Revision as of 07:54, 20 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nick McKenzie article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject iconAustralia: Victoria / Melbourne / Politics / Television Low‑importance
WikiProject iconNick McKenzie is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconJournalism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The following Misplaced Pages contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
ConsensusCurrent consensus (April 2024):
  • In this RfC it was determined that there was consensus to remove contentious material concerning the civil trial between Peter Schiff and others.

NSW found McKenzie's 60 Minutes report defamatory

Why is this not mentioned anywhere? https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/01/business/peter-schiff-defamation-settlement-nine.html Reading the article you'd think McKenzie is an exceptional journalist yet the Supreme Court of NSW found his report defamatory. At the very least this should be mentioned here. 115.70.36.116 (talk) 12:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Please refer to the banner up above which has the heading "Current consensus ..." TarnishedPath 13:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
The page includes other civil trials where the decision was favourable to McKenzie. Why not include trials where he lost? This was a NSW Supreme court decision. The defendants admitted to defamation in the settlement in addition to the judge's ruling. 115.70.36.116 (talk) 11:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Refer to this discussion for any questions you might have. TarnishedPath 11:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories: