| Revision as of 06:41, 21 April 2005 edit128.172.224.210 (talk) →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:42, 21 April 2005 edit undo128.172.224.210 (talk) →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Nice job on the diagram for ]. That was one of the requested pictures that I vaguely hand on my 'keep an eye out for' list, but I doubted I could take a picture that was much better than the previous one. The diagram approach is much better. -- ] 12:12, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC) | Nice job on the diagram for ]. That was one of the requested pictures that I vaguely hand on my 'keep an eye out for' list, but I doubted I could take a picture that was much better than the previous one. The diagram approach is much better. -- ] 12:12, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC) | ||
| I'm sorry but I had 82 family members killed in Vietnam so it is really close to my heart. Therefore I couldn't help express my opinion which was to say FUCK VIETNAM. The piece of shit country of Vietnam resulted in so many deaths in my family, including my father and 14 brothers, that I have been traumatized for many years and attempted suicide numerous times. I thought maybe saying Fuck Vietnam would make me feel better but it only resulted in you warning me and saying if I did it again I would be in trouble. That's made me even more depressed so now I think I'll go try to kill myself again. Taking 30 pills last time didn't work so maybe I'll raise the number up to 40 this time....or I could just slit my wrists. | |||
| == Free Republic/Jim Robinson == | == Free Republic/Jim Robinson == | ||
Revision as of 06:42, 21 April 2005
MacPherson strut
Nice job on the diagram for MacPherson strut. That was one of the requested pictures that I vaguely hand on my 'keep an eye out for' list, but I doubted I could take a picture that was much better than the previous one. The diagram approach is much better. -- Solipsist 12:12, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Free Republic/Jim Robinson
My apologies for merging and redirecting the Jim Robinson article without discussion, but I don't believe it is general policy to have articles on people who are notable only for their websites, when the article about hte website itself will suffice quite well. See e.g. The Best Page in the Universe.
In any case, it is quite easily to undo, as User:Wakeforest demonstrated so aptly. If you want to discuss it, I've brought it up on the Talk:Free Republic page. --Jonathan Christensen 08:28, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- No harm done. My apologies. Silly me, I should have read the Talk:Free Republic page before I commented. Or maybe I shouldn’t have been reading recent changes in the wee hours of the morning. -Casito 23:17, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hey, Sorry to bother you about this again, but might you mind clarifying your position (or lack thereof) on this on the Misplaced Pages:Votes_for_deletion/Jim Robinson page? User:Rangerdude is claiming that you are in support of keeping them as two seperate articles based on your early comments on Talk:Jim Robinson.
Thanks! --Jonathan Christensen 11:34, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
NP. Just setting the record straight -Casito⇝Talk 20:13, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)