| Revision as of 05:18, 12 December 2024 editDocZach (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users961 edits →Emily Prentiss article subject to deletion proposal.: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:03, 12 December 2024 edit undoTiggerjay (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,241 edits →Emily Prentiss article subject to deletion proposal.: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| ::'''For the record once again:''' | ::'''For the record once again:''' | ||
| ::It has come to my attention that @] apparently has a sockpuppet, @], which I did not know was a sockpuppet at the time of notifying him on this talk page about the deletion proposal. One of the most significant recent edits on the Emily Prentiss article that I saw when looking at the edit history was from @], which stated that '''+20,610 </nowiki>]''' characters were added. I did not realize at the time that it was a revert, and whenever you click @], it automatically takes you to @]'s account. I already apologized for misunderstanding that the edit was a revert, but for @] to consistently act as if I've violated policy is borderline defamatory and assuming bad faith. ] (]) 05:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | ::It has come to my attention that @] apparently has a sockpuppet, @], which I did not know was a sockpuppet at the time of notifying him on this talk page about the deletion proposal. One of the most significant recent edits on the Emily Prentiss article that I saw when looking at the edit history was from @], which stated that '''+20,610 </nowiki>]''' characters were added. I did not realize at the time that it was a revert, and whenever you click @], it automatically takes you to @]'s account. I already apologized for misunderstanding that the edit was a revert, but for @] to consistently act as if I've violated policy is borderline defamatory and assuming bad faith. ] (]) 05:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :::@] I will not engage with you on this topic on someone else’s talk page.. You’re welcome to reply to the existing thread over at AfD, or my talk page. I have made my rationale quite clear over on the AfD. ] ] 06:03, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:03, 12 December 2024
Concern regarding Draft:Gears of War (film)
Hello, Crafterstar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gears of War (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Cheshire Crossing (film)
Hello, Crafterstar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cheshire Crossing".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Perfect Strangers (upcoming film)
Hello, Crafterstar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Perfect Strangers".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 20:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Emily Prentiss article subject to deletion proposal.
The Emily Prentiss page has been recently nominated for deletion. You previously have made major edits to the article, so I am notifying you about the current deletion discussion that is occurring here: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Emily Prentiss (2nd nomination)
Please note that I am not the one who proposed it be deleted. I am simply informing you of the discussion occurring since you've made major contributions to the article before. DocZach (talk) 14:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Crafterstar - for the record you did nothing wrong whatsoever, and almost anyone can contribute to an AfD discussion, and it is encouraged. You were notified about the discussion and you contributed. While I disagree with your reasoning, that is also encouraged, as that is how consensus works! I would say you DO NOT owe anyone an apology for voicing your opinions on the matter. Rather what Jontesta discovered was that DocZach specifically picked two people (out of over 400 people who have edited the article) to contribute which appears to violate WP:CANVASS which is prohibited, especially because you do not appear to satisfy WP:APPNOTE. You had no way of knowing this, so your initial participation is fine -- only if you agree that your participation might fit into WP:CANVASS and WP:APPNOTE then you can completely optionally elect to strike your vote, and instead replace it with a comment. But I don't have a strong opinion on this, but rather suggest it might be an appropriate response to your initial question of
Am I supposed to apologise
. TiggerJay (talk) 02:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)- For the record once again:
- It has come to my attention that @Crafterstar apparently has a sockpuppet, @Ebbedlila, which I did not know was a sockpuppet at the time of notifying him on this talk page about the deletion proposal. One of the most significant recent edits on the Emily Prentiss article that I saw when looking at the edit history was from @Ebbedlila, which stated that +20,610 characters were added. I did not realize at the time that it was a revert, and whenever you click @Ebbedlila, it automatically takes you to @Crafterstar's account. I already apologized for misunderstanding that the edit was a revert, but for @Tiggerjay to consistently act as if I've violated policy is borderline defamatory and assuming bad faith. DocZach (talk) 05:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @DocZach I will not engage with you on this topic on someone else’s talk page.. You’re welcome to reply to the existing thread over at AfD, or my talk page. I have made my rationale quite clear over on the AfD. TiggerJay (talk) 06:03, 12 December 2024 (UTC)