| Revision as of 17:07, 13 December 2024 editAmateurHi$torian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,429 editsNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:08, 13 December 2024 edit undoAmateurHi$torian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,429 editsNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit: SwitchedNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| == History == | == History == | ||
| ] suggested that the manuscript may not have been a royal commission, given the indigenous style of the paintings. However, modern scholars including ] and Mark Zebrowski agree that it was compiled with royal patronage.{{sfn|Sohoni|2018| |
] suggested that the manuscript may not have been a royal commission, given the indigenous style of the paintings. However, modern scholars including ] and Mark Zebrowski agree that it was compiled with royal patronage.{{sfn|Sohoni|2018|p=42}} | ||
| It is a matter of contention among scholars as to whether the manuscript was completed by the time of Husain Shah's death. Zebrowski points out that since the sultan's death is not mentioned, and the campaign of Vijayanagara is vividly shown, it must have been produced between the victory at Vijayanagara, in early 1565 and Husain Shah's death, later the same year.{{sfn|Sohoni|2018| |
It is a matter of contention among scholars as to whether the manuscript was completed by the time of Husain Shah's death. Zebrowski points out that since the sultan's death is not mentioned, and the campaign of Vijayanagara is vividly shown, it must have been produced between the victory at Vijayanagara, in early 1565 and Husain Shah's death, later the same year.{{sfn|Sohoni|2018|p=42}}{{sfn|Zebrowski|1983|pp=17}} However, the fact that ] features so prominently in both the text and the illustrations suggests that it might have been completed during her regency.{{Sfn|Sohoni|2018|p=44}} | ||
| == Text == | == Text == | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| The folios 20b, 21b, 26b, 36a and 40b depict court life. In these, the queen ] was featured, in Indian poses, such as sitting on her husband's lap. Such poses were common in the representation of Hindu gods. These paintings were unorthodox for a work commissioned for the court of a Muslim kingdom. The queen's images were scraped off, probably during the reign of her son Murtaza I.{{sfn|Sohoni|2018|pp=44}}{{sfn|Zebrowski|1983|pp=18}} | The folios 20b, 21b, 26b, 36a and 40b depict court life. In these, the queen ] was featured, in Indian poses, such as sitting on her husband's lap. Such poses were common in the representation of Hindu gods. These paintings were unorthodox for a work commissioned for the court of a Muslim kingdom. The queen's images were scraped off, probably during the reign of her son Murtaza I.{{sfn|Sohoni|2018|pp=44}}{{sfn|Zebrowski|1983|pp=18}} | ||
| The folio 29a shows the ''dohada'' theme, where a tree blooms at the touch of a young woman. The young woman here is the queen Khunza Humayun, and the painting symbolizes the kingdom's prosperity during her reign. However, her image is not scraped off. Six women surround her, all being dressed in saris.{{sfn|Sohoni|2018| |
The folio 29a shows the ''dohada'' theme, where a tree blooms at the touch of a young woman. The young woman here is the queen Khunza Humayun, and the painting symbolizes the kingdom's prosperity during her reign. However, her image is not scraped off. Six women surround her, all being dressed in saris.{{sfn|Sohoni|2018|p=42}}{{sfn|Zebrowski|1983|pp=18}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Museum |first=Salar Jung |url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Gulshan_e_mu%E1%B9%A3awwari/Qm63aoHBPZEC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=tarif+i+husain+shahi+dohada&dq=tarif+i+husain+shahi+dohada&printsec=frontcover |title=Gulshan-e-muṣawwari: Seven Illustrated Manuscripts from the Salar Jung Museum, Hyderabad |last2=Khandalavala |first2=Karl J. |last3=Khan |first3=Rahmat Ali |date=1986 |publisher=Salar Jung Museum |language=en}}</ref> | ||
| The folios 34b, 43b, 44a, 45b, 46b and 47a depict the campaign against ].{{sfn|Zebrowski|1983|pp=18}} | The folios 34b, 43b, 44a, 45b, 46b and 47a depict the campaign against ].{{sfn|Zebrowski|1983|pp=18}} | ||
Revision as of 17:08, 13 December 2024
| Author | Aftabi |
|---|---|
| Language | Persian |
Kitab-i Tarif-i Husain Shah Padshah-i Dakan (Chronicle of Husain Shah, King of the Deccan), generally known as Tarif-i Husain Shahi or Tarif-i Husain Shah is a manuscript compiled in the Ahmadnagar Sultanate.
It is located at the Bharat Itihas Sanshodhak Mandal.
History
Stella Kramrisch suggested that the manuscript may not have been a royal commission, given the indigenous style of the paintings. However, modern scholars including Pushkar Sohoni and Mark Zebrowski agree that it was compiled with royal patronage.
It is a matter of contention among scholars as to whether the manuscript was completed by the time of Husain Shah's death. Zebrowski points out that since the sultan's death is not mentioned, and the campaign of Vijayanagara is vividly shown, it must have been produced between the victory at Vijayanagara, in early 1565 and Husain Shah's death, later the same year. However, the fact that Khunza Humayun features so prominently in both the text and the illustrations suggests that it might have been completed during her regency.
Text
It belongs to the mathnawi genre.
Paintings
.jpg)
It originally contained fourteen illustrations, of which 12 survive. All of the paintings are in a vertical format, and the size ranges from 18 by 12 cm to 18 by 15 cm. The paintings have little to do with the text.
Five of the paintings illustrate courtly life, and six illustrate the campaign against Vijayanagara. Thus, eleven of the twelve paintings depict razm-o-bazm (feasting and fighting), which commonly features in Persian art.
The folios 20b, 21b, 26b, 36a and 40b depict court life. In these, the queen Khunza Humayun was featured, in Indian poses, such as sitting on her husband's lap. Such poses were common in the representation of Hindu gods. These paintings were unorthodox for a work commissioned for the court of a Muslim kingdom. The queen's images were scraped off, probably during the reign of her son Murtaza I.
The folio 29a shows the dohada theme, where a tree blooms at the touch of a young woman. The young woman here is the queen Khunza Humayun, and the painting symbolizes the kingdom's prosperity during her reign. However, her image is not scraped off. Six women surround her, all being dressed in saris.
The folios 34b, 43b, 44a, 45b, 46b and 47a depict the campaign against Vijayanagara.
References
- ^ Sohoni 2018, p. 42.
- Zebrowski 1983, pp. 17.
- ^ Sohoni 2018, p. 44. Cite error: The named reference "FOOTNOTESohoni201844" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- Sohoni 2018, p. 41.
- Sohoni 2018, pp. 41–42, 45.
- ^ Zebrowski 1983, pp. 18.
- Museum, Salar Jung; Khandalavala, Karl J.; Khan, Rahmat Ali (1986). Gulshan-e-muṣawwari: Seven Illustrated Manuscripts from the Salar Jung Museum, Hyderabad. Salar Jung Museum.
Bibilography
- Sohoni, Pushkar (2018). The Architecture of a Deccan Sultanate: Courtly Practice and Royal Authority in Late Medieval India. I. B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
- Zebrowski, Mark (1983). Deccani painting. Roli Books International, New Delhi.
 | This article needs additional or more specific categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles. (December 2024) |