| Revision as of 09:45, 27 December 2024 editQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,013,189 editsm →CS1 error on Caroline Ellison: (Task 17)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:49, 27 December 2024 edit undoAlexpl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,226 edits ←Blanked the pageTag: Blanking | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1187132125 --> | |||
| == Introduction to contentious topics == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''], broadly construed''', a topic designated as ''']'''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. | |||
| A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. | |||
| Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: | |||
| *adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages; | |||
| *comply with all applicable policies and guidelines; | |||
| *follow editorial and behavioural best practice; | |||
| *comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and | |||
| *refrain from gaming the system. | |||
| <p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> | |||
| ] You have recently made edits related to articles about ], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about ], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see ]. <!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert --> ] (] / ]) 14:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Just... . ] deleted my edit , then you put my source back in and an account named "ScienceFlyer" with a conclusion, that rates both sources in that phrase as basically idiotic, without any reference behind his conclusion - original research. Which doesn´t seem to trigger any response by you. Maybe that was the articles subject himself, but even that individual should at least have to reference his stuff. ** ] (]) 14:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for pointing out the OR issue. I reverted. If you see any further issues, please bring them up at the article talk page instead of here. ] (] / ]) 15:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Removal of content == | |||
| Why did you remove ], ] and ] from the article ]?, as you did . Simply claiming that the Jacobin and the Nation are "niche" isn't exactly meaningful and I don't see how being a private NGO is a reason to exclude Euro-Med Monitor. Please be more cautious and do not remove well sourced and attributed content. ] (]) 15:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :"Well sourced"? You didn´t even bother to format them and all three have problems. "Jacobin" and "the Nation" in particular are sources with a very limited range. But as being major opinions. Yes, "''The Israeli operation has been referred to as a massacre''", as you stated it, but by a socialist online newspaper and an arts magazine, who´s points and wording are not reflected by major publications - as far as I can tell. So they don´t really belong in the article. See . It states "''articles should not give minority views or aspects as much of or as detailed a description as more widely held views or widely supported aspects''". ] (]) 20:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's not giving undue weight, it's just one paragraph presenting one significant point of view within RS, which both Jacobin and The Nation are (see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources). This view/assessment should absolutely be included with attribution. | |||
| ::Euro-Med Monitor also refers to the operation as a massacre and it's ambiguous if the statement of the UN special rapporteurs is referring to the Shifa operation specifically when it begins with "We are appalled by the massacre of civilians by Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip." though it does describe it as an "atrocity" and seems to describe a massacre when it speaks of "The besieging and destruction of a hospital and the killing of health workers, the sick and wounded, and the people who protect them" and "the deliberate destruction of health infrastructure in Gaza". | |||
| ::So it's not exactly a ] view and neither is it given undue prominence. | |||
| ::- ] (]) 21:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::"Euro-Med Monitor" is a civilian NGO. They chose an official-sounding name, but have no special credibility. And I bet there is an almost unlimited supply of other wierd opinions in other dubious press publications. All worthy of representation in the article. This will be fun. ] (]) 21:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::We're not talking about "wierd opinions in dubious press publications", as I pointed out both The Nation and Jacobin are considered to be reliable sources and their views/assessments are attributed to them in the article. | |||
| ::::- ] (]) 21:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Just because you found something on google, which uses the word "Al Shifa + massacre", doesn´t make that find a "reliable source". The source is called "the Jacobin", even with just a basic knowledge about history, that should be a red flag. Literally. Well, meanwhile I found a "Breitbart" article <nowiki>"https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/04/03/utter-disgrace-who-chief-slammed-over-abhorrent-gaza-hospital-post-ignoring-hamas-terror-hq-within/"</nowiki>, it is also totally reliable and has to be quoted in the article, especially to put the stupid Tedros-quotes into context. ]: "''“The hospital was full of Hamas terrorists and weapons and they were shooting from inside the complex”''" (...) ]: "''“If only the head of the World Health Organization would speak as forcefully against Hamas using hospitals as military bases as he does in speaking out against Israel clearing Hamas out of hospitals''" (...) etc. pp. ] (]) 12:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::All due respect but I'm not sure you have the ] or temperament to be editing in this contentious topic area. ] (]) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::That would be a great comment, but I do not measure by talkpage comments, just by work in the article - and your edits in the Al-Shifa article aren´t presentable. As displayed by the latest introduction of Friedman´s "ElectronicIntifada" piece. And of course, nobody still cares for the opinion pieces by "Seraj Assi" or "Linah Alsaafin" you put in the article. If you ever manage to put their names in the references - that is. ] (]) 10:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == CS1 error on ] == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that ] performed by you, on the page ], may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: | |||
| * A ] error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | ) | |||
| Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | |||
| Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->] (]) 17:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == CS1 error on ] == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that ] performed by you, on the page ], may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: | |||
| * A ] error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | ) | |||
| Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | |||
| Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->] (]) 15:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 --> | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for December 27 == | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, --] (]) 07:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == CS1 error on ] == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that ] performed by you, on the page ], may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: | |||
| * A ] error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | ) | |||
| Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | |||
| Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->] (]) 09:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == CS1 error on ] == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that ] performed by you, on the page ], may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: | |||
| * A ] error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | ) | |||
| Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | |||
| Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->] (]) 09:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||