Misplaced Pages

User talk:DDRG: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:19, 22 April 2007 editDDRG (talk | contribs)181 edits Joji Obara← Previous edit Revision as of 04:53, 28 April 2007 edit undoCoelacan (talk | contribs)14,831 edits 3RR blockNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
::So if we won't agree with you there won't be a consensus? That comment shows your lack of understanding how consensus-building works. Please read up on ]. Also, ], a policy you keep on violating. ] 21:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC) ::So if we won't agree with you there won't be a consensus? That comment shows your lack of understanding how consensus-building works. Please read up on ]. Also, ], a policy you keep on violating. ] 21:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
:::Your conduct that you said other side people are racist shows clearly your lack of understanding how consensus-building works. Please read up on ]. Also, ], a policy you keep on violating. ] 22:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC) :::Your conduct that you said other side people are racist shows clearly your lack of understanding how consensus-building works. Please read up on ]. Also, ], a policy you keep on violating. ] 22:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

== 3RR block ==

I have ] you from editing for 24 hours in accordance with ] for ] at ]. The following reverts are 24 hours and 20 minutes from the first to the last. The ] is not a license to make three reverts every day. Slow motion edit warring is still disruptive, and this requires a block to stop the disruption for other editors. In the future, please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. I strongly suggest a ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> below. ··]] 04:53, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:53, 28 April 2007

3RR

If you revert the Asahi Shimbun article again you will be making yourself guilty of breaking WP:3RR (read it), which means you will probably be blocked/banned temporarily from editing Misplaced Pages. Mackan 12:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Also, please don't mark reverts as "minor edits" - they are not. See Misplaced Pages:Minor edits. Mackan 13:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Single purpose account

This user is a single purpose account, only used to try and discredit Asahi Shimbun (see user contributions), after the article was canvassed in a comment to this blog post (which itself was calling for meatpuppets to edit the Comfort women article) . Mackan 11:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

You are doing personal attack with false reason. Those were written at least in last year. Stop parsonal attacking. You are faffing my translation tasks. It's a holding action for Misplaced Pages community DDRG 11:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Your message

Are you a teacher of moral education?

No, a teacher of the English language -- so I know when it's being misused, as you are doing.

Provide a (semi-)coherent explanation of your actions on the article talk page and I'll consider reverting, otherwise you're on the fast-track to Banville without any brakes. --Calton | Talk 08:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Umm. Are you doing a good turn to everybody like to me??? LOL. Thanks. DDRG
Hey DDRG, don't worry, Calton can ban you no more than he can ban me. He is not an admin. If you need some help with your article, please let me know and I will be glad to help. - SVRTVDude 16:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Orangemonster, are you stalking Calton or is it just the way it looks? Maybe you should do some research before you support users on the basis that they've been opposed by Calton. This user is an extremely disruptive single purpose account. Mackan 19:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice, SVRTVDude. I will call on your help when I need it. Thanks. DDRG 18:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
DDRG, I am sorry, but obviously my helping you, for whatever reason, is being frowned upon and I apologize for that. If you need help, ask User:El_C, he is an admin, who is really helpful when you are having problems and can give you a hand or point you in the right direction to someone who can. Again, my apologizes. - SVRTVDude 20:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. Never mind it. As a matter of fact, I think I can do them by myself. DDRG 20:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Joji Obara

The only way there can be a resolution made regarding the nationality of Joji Obara is if you go to the talk page and discuss. You may not want to, but I will not unprotect the page until I see discussion and some progress towards consensus from all parties involved. Nishkid64 21:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I will do some of it. But I wonder "some progress towards consensus" can be made. It seems that they don't want to write it in first paragraph. So I think it will be usefull to gather some examples as some kind of second source.DDRG 21:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
So if we won't agree with you there won't be a consensus? That comment shows your lack of understanding how consensus-building works. Please read up on WP:CON. Also, WP:BIO, a policy you keep on violating. Mackan 21:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Your conduct that you said other side people are racist shows clearly your lack of understanding how consensus-building works. Please read up on WP:CON. Also, WP:BIO, a policy you keep on violating. DDRG 22:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

3RR block

I have blocked you from editing for 24 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for edit warring at Asahi Shimbun. The following reverts are 24 hours and 20 minutes from the first to the last. The three revert rule is not a license to make three reverts every day. Slow motion edit warring is still disruptive, and this requires a block to stop the disruption for other editors. In the future, please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. I strongly suggest a request for comment. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ··coelacan 04:53, 28 April 2007 (UTC)