Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:15, 31 December 2024

If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I'll probably add it to my watchlist, but if I miss something, feel free to leave a talkback. If you leave a message for me: I will most likely respond here. Either add this page to your watchlist or ask me to notify you of a response on your talk page. Note: I reserve the right to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to take further action through permissable means. (See this policy.) If I mistakenly called your edits as vandalism when I reverted them, it was probably because you did not leave an edit summary. Please realize that, in many cases, unexplained edits are indistinguishable from vandalism! This also applies to Rollbacks. If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you will be reverted...and beware the giant dice.

This editor is a Grand High Togneme Vicarus and is entitled to write the Book of All Knowledge: 2nd Edition.

Archives

as Aerobird - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35

This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present.

The Bugle: Issue 224, December 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Franco-Prussian War Op-ed: Nick-D visits the Swiss Air Force Museum

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Teahouse#WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT

I am planning on writing an essay of WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT, however, before moving forward with it, I will need to go on with planning a name for it and not the term "I don't like who created it" when naming this essay that is going to include the WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT element. GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

I'd strongly suggest you do not. From the discussion at ANI it is clear it is not coming from a place of good faith. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:25, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Then who will write it? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Nobody should, as it's already covered in other essays, as has been pointed out to you. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

where is it covered in said other essays? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

It's acutally policy. Assume good faith. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:48, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Bless you for dealing with that awful ANI thread extensively covering another language wiki's drama on ours to no end. I wouldn't have the patience. Have a happy new year! jellyfish ✉ 05:22, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Just trying to help. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Yes, your efforts are certainly appreciated, but I wonder whether "tit for tat" is the best choice of words in context . EEng 08:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

If there's another meaning there, it's escaping me, I'll admit. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)