Revision as of 08:15, 31 December 2024 editThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators157,500 edits →A cookie for you!: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:02, 31 December 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,142 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:The Bushranger/Archive38. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | {{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 224, December 2024 == | |||
{| style="width: 100%;" | |||
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | | |||
{| | |||
| ] | |||
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> | |||
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
* Project news: '']'' | |||
* Articles: '']'' | |||
* Book review: '']'' | |||
* Op-ed: '']'' | |||
</div> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
|} | |||
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> | |||
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 12:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1264992348 --> | |||
== ] == | == ] == |
Revision as of 16:02, 31 December 2024
|
This editor is a Grand High Togneme Vicarus and is entitled to write the Book of All Knowledge: 2nd Edition. |
Archives |
as Aerobird - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - |
This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Misplaced Pages:Teahouse#WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT
I am planning on writing an essay of WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT, however, before moving forward with it, I will need to go on with planning a name for it and not the term "I don't like who created it" when naming this essay that is going to include the WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT element. GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'd strongly suggest you do not. From the discussion at ANI it is clear it is not coming from a place of good faith. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:25, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Then who will write it? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nobody should, as it's already covered in other essays, as has been pointed out to you. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- where is it covered in said other essays? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's acutally policy. Assume good faith. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:48, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- where is it covered in said other essays? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nobody should, as it's already covered in other essays, as has been pointed out to you. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Then who will write it? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 06:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Bless you for dealing with that awful ANI thread extensively covering another language wiki's drama on ours to no end. I wouldn't have the patience. Have a happy new year! jellyfish ✉ 05:22, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Just trying to help. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, your efforts are certainly appreciated, but I wonder whether "tit for tat" is the best choice of words in context . EEng 08:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- If there's another meaning there, it's escaping me, I'll admit. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, your efforts are certainly appreciated, but I wonder whether "tit for tat" is the best choice of words in context . EEng 08:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)