Misplaced Pages

Talk:Jews: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:51, 2 January 2025 edit2a02:9130:fe13:a7d1:1816:a825:2852:39e6 (talk) Non-White Jews: ReplyTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:08, 2 January 2025 edit undoAndreJustAndre (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,518 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 2A02:9130:FE13:A7D1:1816:A825:2852:39E6 (talk) to last revision by Lowercase sigmabot IIITags: Twinkle Undo 
Line 95: Line 95:
:Moroccan Jews are mentioned in five places in the article. In addition, there's a section titled "]". So it isn't clear what your concern is. ] (]) 13:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC) :Moroccan Jews are mentioned in five places in the article. In addition, there's a section titled "]". So it isn't clear what your concern is. ] (]) 13:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
::@] oh ok nvm ] (]) 13:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC) ::@] oh ok nvm ] (]) 13:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
:brrrrrrr skibidi sigma ] (]) 15:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)


== Not the only Israelites that had kept their distinct identity (See: ]) == == Not the only Israelites that had kept their distinct identity (See: ]) ==

Latest revision as of 16:08, 2 January 2025

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jews article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Judaism or Jewish people. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Judaism or Jewish people at the Reference desk.
Former good articleJews was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 23, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 6, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
October 6, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
February 26, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
April 18, 2017Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconEthnic groups Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

WikiProject iconIsrael Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconJudaism Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJewish history Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWestern Asia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

  • RM, Jew → Jewish people, No consensus, 10 July 2007, Discussion
  • RM, Jew → Jews, Moved, 17 January 2010, Discussion
  • RM, Jews → Jewish people, Not moved, 10 October 2017, Discussion
  • RM, Jews → Jewish people, Not moved, 29 April 2018, Discussion
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
Archiving icon
Archives

Talk:Jews/infobox



This page has archives.

Non-White Jews

We all know full well there are such things as Arab Jews. Why is there no data on all the Moroccon Jews? They all exist. But we only recognise the Ashkenazi Jews (Modern Israel Jews) Issue resolved MjhdNfl (talk) 00:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean. We have several articles on Mizrahi Jews and Arab Jews, History of the Jews in Morocco, and so on. Andre🚐 03:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
@Andrevan
Ik, but shouldn't it be part of the bigger article on the Jews? MjhdNfl (talk) 03:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Sure, of course, Mizrahim occurs at least 7 times on this page, North Africa at least 20 times Andre🚐 03:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Moroccan Jews are mentioned in five places in the article. In addition, there's a section titled "Ethnic divisions". So it isn't clear what your concern is. Largoplazo (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
@Largoplazo oh ok nvm MjhdNfl (talk) 13:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Not the only Israelites that had kept their distinct identity (See: Samaritans)

Name and etymology: "After the Exile, the term Yehudi (Jew) was used for all followers of Judaism because the survivors of the Exile (who were the former residents of the Kingdom of Judah) were the only Israelites that had kept their distinct identity as the ten tribes from the northern Kingdom of Israel had been scattered and assimilated into other populations."

This claim is not totally true and misleading. Samaritans are crying in the corner. Theofunny (talk) 08:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

What’s with the glazing in the last paragraph?

“Jews wrote the Bible, founded Christianity, and had an indirect but profound influence on Islam.”

Not only does this sentence contain somewhat misleading (or at least incomplete) phrasing for the first two parts, but the language itself seems to be leaning towards glazing. The preceding sentence is sufficient.

Lmk if I’m totally off base here, this is just my perception 65.112.8.31 (talk) 07:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Seems fine to me, literally true statements, no puffery detected. Andre🚐 07:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Alright, perhaps I was mistaken. I still think it might be beneficial to reword it in a way that doesn’t oversimplify things as much. 65.112.8.31 (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
How would you want to reword it? Andre🚐 22:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
"Jews authored the Bible, established Christianity, and influenced Islam." Moxy🍁 01:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Seems fine to me. Andre🚐 01:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
The first two clauses seems mostly a substitution of longer words for shorter ones, with no apparent change in meaning or other improvement I can see. As far as the last clause, given that Islam is one of the three Abrahamic religions, and the many links mentioned in the lead paragraph of Judaism and Islam, the word profound seems an accurate description, and not puffery.
To the IP: a short, assertive statement in the WP:LEAD is not an oversimplification, if it is a summary of content in the body of the article that demonstrates that the lead statement is correct and lays out the most important points without all the details excected in the body. Not everything can be crammed into the lead; remember that WP:LEAD is just a summary of the most important points of the body, and that sentence seems fine for the lead. (edit conflict) Mathglot (talk) 01:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Agree with Mathglot. Carlstak (talk) 02:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: