| Revision as of 19:20, 8 January 2025 editLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators765,940 edits AFDs← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:26, 8 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,389 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Randykitty/Archive 34) (bot | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| {{User:Yomangan/Humour}} | {{User:Yomangan/Humour}} | ||
| --> | --> | ||
| == Reversion of page change by Journal Editor == | |||
| Hello - I'm not sure what happened, but I'm the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Operations Management. In an effort to make the most current information about the Journal available I added direct links to our official journal page that we manage: www.jom-hub.com . However, these changes were undone. As EiC I assure you that this www.jom-hub.com is the official site. Indeed if you go to the Wiley site for the Journal, you will see a prominent link to www.jom-hub.com | |||
| I'm not sure what else can be said to assure Misplaced Pages of this. There is no one higher than the EiCs on this question. ] (]) 16:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *Hi, I see on your talk page that you have been advised that you should disclose your COI and how to do that (years ago, in fact). As for the website, I have changed that, I went a bit too fast when I looked at the Wiley page. I did again remove that one sentence with an inappropriate in-text external link. The way websites are presented now make this lin unnecessary. As for your suggestion in one of your edit summaries of a phone call with "Misplaced Pages", that won't happen. As a management specialist you should know by now that WP is decentralized and basically a functioning anarchy. There's no way to contact WP, only individual editors (and in case of conflicts, noticeboards like ]). --] (]) 17:07, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == CfD nomination at ] == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd mass notice--> Thank you. –] (]]) 01:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == CNRS == | == CNRS == | ||
Latest revision as of 19:26, 8 January 2025
 | I am on an extended wikibreak and will be much less online than usual (if at all). If you need an admin, please go to WP:AN. If you came here because I speedily deleted an article, please see WP:REFUND first. If you have questions/problems concerning academic journals, Headbomb is very knowledgeable on this subject and always very helpful. Thanks. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hi, and welcome to my User Talk page! For new discussions, please add your comments at the very bottom and use a section heading (e.g., by using the "+" tab, or, depending on your settings, the "new section" tab at the top of this page). I will respond on this page unless specifically requested otherwise. I dislike talk-back templates and fragmented discussions. If I post on your page you may assume that I will watch it for a response. If you post here I will assume the same (and that you lost interest if you stop following the discussion).
START A NEW TALK TOPIC.CNRS
How about you give a valid reason for this? Ombreux (talk) 15:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- And a Happy New Year to you, too! While I appreciate your effort to improve the CNRS article, the sad reality is that nobody pays any attention to those SCImago rankings: not journals, not publishers, and not any universities or research organizations. I bet that not even the CNRS themselves have given this any attention, but even if they did, it wouldn't change the fact that SCImago for all purposes is trivial. Hope this explains. --Randykitty (talk) 20:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RFC, Misplaced Pages:Notability (species) was adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
Technical news
- The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Liz, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, Theleekycauldron, Worm That Turned.
Miscellaneous
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
AFDs
Hello, Randykitty,
It was great to see that you have been closing some AFDs today. Your help has been missed! I think it's better for the project to have a larger pool of admin closers who can rotate in for a day or two when they are available rather than relying on only a couple of closers to handle the lion's share of closures. Misplaced Pages benefits from having a variety of experience and perspectives, all guided by policy, of course. Thank you. Liz 19:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)