| Revision as of 23:51, 8 January 2025 edit80.200.232.89 (talk) →January 2025: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:53, 8 January 2025 edit undoMrOllie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers238,655 edits Warning: Three-revert rule.Tag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| :::What? I specifically said that prenatal development is a factor in nonshared environment? You're repeating what I said. ] (]) 23:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | :::What? I specifically said that prenatal development is a factor in nonshared environment? You're repeating what I said. ] (]) 23:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::::You can't just say that 100% of the variance in both shared and nonshared factors are simply the cause of prenatal development. That's unscientific and above all disingenious. ] (]) 23:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | ::::You can't just say that 100% of the variance in both shared and nonshared factors are simply the cause of prenatal development. That's unscientific and above all disingenious. ] (]) 23:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about ]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 23:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
Revision as of 23:53, 8 January 2025
December 2024
Hello, I'm Eyer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Communism and LGBTQ rights, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Eyer (he/him) If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message. 21:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Eyer: The wiki article concurs with everything I wrote already. 80.200.232.89 (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- On further reading, I see that you're adding sourced content from the article to the lead. I'm sorry that I didn't catch that before. A lot of editors add defamatory text to articles as an act of vandalism, and your edit looked like that at first glance. If you re-add your text, be sure to capitalize "East Asian" and "Communist" so that your text matches Misplaced Pages style. Best wishes. —Eyer (he/him) If you reply, add
{{reply to|Eyer}}to your message. 21:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- On further reading, I see that you're adding sourced content from the article to the lead. I'm sorry that I didn't catch that before. A lot of editors add defamatory text to articles as an act of vandalism, and your edit looked like that at first glance. If you re-add your text, be sure to capitalize "East Asian" and "Communist" so that your text matches Misplaced Pages style. Best wishes. —Eyer (he/him) If you reply, add
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Communism and LGBTQ rights. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. C F A 22:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Mate none of the other phrases are referenced in the lead as well. This is so as to not cause any clutter in the lead. I just added sourced content from the article to the lead. 80.200.232.89 (talk) 00:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Communism and LGBTQ rights, you may be blocked from editing. SomeHelpfulEditor (talk) 00:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Mate none of the other phrases are referenced in the lead as well. This is so as to not cause any clutter in the lead. I just added sourced content from the article to the lead... like how all wiki articles work. 80.200.232.89 (talk) 00:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
January 2025
Please stop. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Misplaced Pages do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. MrOllie (talk) 19:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Cap but ok vro 80.200.232.89 (talk) 21:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- If you continue to lie about my edits and vandalize the articles which I edit, you may be blocked from editing. The GWAS article was somewhat understandable, not the article about biology and sexuality though. Perhaps you should try to read what my reasoning was to remove whatever I removed in that article? I mean, the source the person cites quite literally contradicts what they said. It's not fringe when the scientific community generally believes homosexuality to be largely environmental.
- Also, nonshared environmental factors =/= prenatal development. It also means unique experiences (their own friend group, for example). prenatal development is definitely a factor, but its not the only one. 80.200.232.89 (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
"It also means unique experiences (their own friend group, for example). prenatal development is definitely a factor, but its not the only one"
– well, you simply don't know what you are talking about. Non-shared environment can include effects in utero. As can shared env. A GWAS certainly cannot tell you what type of environment is at play. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)- What? I specifically said that prenatal development is a factor in nonshared environment? You're repeating what I said. 80.200.232.89 (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- You can't just say that 100% of the variance in both shared and nonshared factors are simply the cause of prenatal development. That's unscientific and above all disingenious. 80.200.232.89 (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- What? I specifically said that prenatal development is a factor in nonshared environment? You're repeating what I said. 80.200.232.89 (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 23:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.Vandalism
Please stop vandalising Biology and sexual orientation. Your assertion that there is "straight up lying" on the article is incorrect. The "environment" includes non-social events, such as prenatal hormone exposure. Left handedness only has a modest influence of genes with a heritability of about 25%, but is more or less inborn, due to the environment in utero. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Zenomonoz The source itself says that SHARED environmental factors account for 22% of the variance in homosexuality. Also, nonshared environmental factors also include unique experiences or influences, like friendships or events, that make people different, even if they grow up in the same family. 80.200.232.89 (talk) 23:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Twin studies have been significantly underpowered, for starters. The largest twin study from Sweden found 0% for the shared environment on male sexual orientation, and modest effects on female sexual orientation.
- Shared environment can also include any shared prenatal hormone exposure washes, non shared environment can include any fluctuation that only hit one twin. You're the one insisting this must mean postnatal social influence and deleting a reliable secondary source (the Bailey review) to POV push on Misplaced Pages. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)