Misplaced Pages

Democratic Underground: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:14, 1 October 2024 editSiddique Shaheed (talk | contribs)21 editsNo edit summaryTags: Visual edit Newcomer task Newcomer task: expand← Previous edit Revision as of 16:09, 9 January 2025 edit undoDavide King (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users104,703 edits copyeditingTag: Visual editNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Online political community}} {{short description|Online political community}}
{{Use American English|date=October 2020}} {{use American English|date=October 2020}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2020}} {{use mdy dates|date=October 2020}}
{{Infobox website {{Infobox website
| name = Democratic Underground | name = Democratic Underground
| location_city = United States | location_city = United States
| url = {{URL|https://www.democraticunderground.com}} | url = {{URL|https://www.democraticunderground.com}}
| launch_date = {{start date and age|2001|1|20}}
| launch_date = {{start date and age|2001|1|20}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://whois.domaintools.com/democraticunderground.com|title=DemocraticUnderground.com WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info - DomainTools|work=]|access-date=2016-08-14}}</ref>
}} }}
'''Democratic Underground''' is an ] for members of the ] in the Unites States. Its membership is restricted by policy to those who are supportive of the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates for political office.

'''Democratic Underground''' is an ] for members of the ]. Its membership is restricted by policy to those who are supportive of the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates for political office.<ref name="duenforcerules">{{cite web|title=Terms of Service|website=Democratic Underground|url=https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice|access-date=2012-10-08 }}</ref>


== History == == History ==
{{Recentism|section|date=February 2023}} {{recentism|section|date=February 2023}}
{{Expand section|date=October 2020}} {{expand section|date=October 2020}}
Created on December 5, 2000,<ref>{{cite web |date=2002 |title=DemocraticUnderground.com WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info |url=http://whois.domaintools.com/democraticunderground.com |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181122141755/http://whois.domaintools.com/democraticunderground.com |archive-date=November 22, 2018 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=Domain Tools}}</ref> Democratic Underground was launched on January 20, 2001. It describes itself as a "grassroots ] political community" and "an online community for friendly, ] people who understand the importance of working together to elect more Democrats and fewer ] to all levels of American government".<ref>{{cite web |date=2012 |title=Terms of Service |url=https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20241211190359/https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice |archive-date=December 11, 2024 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |website=Democratic Underground}}</ref> On Election Day 2016, the forum was hacked and rendered unavailable, which the site blamed on ] trolls.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Leyden |first=John |date=November 10, 2016 |title=Left-wing cyber-hangout blames security breach on pro-Trump trolls |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/11/10/democrat_site_blames_pro_trump_hackers/ |access-date=January 9, 2025 |website=The Register}}</ref>
On Election Day 2016, the forum was hacked and rendered unavailable, which the site blamed on pro-Trump trolls.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/11/10/democrat_site_blames_pro_trump_hackers/|title=Left-wing cyber-hangout blames security breach on pro-Trump trolls|last=Leyden|first=John|date=10 November 2016|website=]|language=en-UK|access-date=2020-04-23}}</ref>


==Criticism== == Criticism ==
Discussions from posters at DU have drawn criticism. One example of this was the dialog about the ], in which a few posts explored the possibility of "]". The posts were reported on by '']''<ref name="nytsuenammy">{{cite web|last=Schwartz|first=John|title=Myths Run Wild in Blog Tsunami Debate|website=]|date=2005-01-03|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/03/world/worldspecial4/myths-run-wild-in-blog-tsunami-debate.html|access-date=2007-05-02}}</ref> and ].<ref name="foxnewsdisaster">{{cite web|last=Hume|first=Brit|author-link=Brit Hume|title=Disaster's Cause?|website=]|date=2005-01-04|url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/disasters-cause|access-date=2007-05-02}}</ref> An administrator also sent a letter to the ''Times'', which was printed.<ref name="lettertonyt">{{cite web|last=Washington|first=David Allen|date=January 10, 2005|title=Online Debate Forums|website=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/10/opinion/online-debate-forums-090700.html}}</ref> Discussions from posters at Democratic Underground have drawn criticism. One example of this was the dialog about the ], in which a few posts explored the possibility of "]". The posts were reported on by John Schwartz on '']'' and ] on ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Schwartz |first=John |date=January 3, 2005 |title=Myths Run Wild in Blog Tsunami Debate |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/03/world/worldspecial4/myths-run-wild-in-blog-tsunami-debate.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150529171240/http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/03/world/worldspecial4/myths-run-wild-in-blog-tsunami-debate.html |archive-date=May 29, 2015 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=The New York Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Hume |first=Brit |date=January 4, 2005 |title=Disaster's Cause? |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/disasters-cause |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201031143648/https://www.foxnews.com/story/disasters-cause |archive-date=October 31, 2020 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=Fox News}}</ref> An administrator also sent a letter to ''The New York Times'', which was printed.<ref>{{cite news |last=Washington |first=David Allen |date=January 10, 2005 |title=Online Debate Forums |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/10/opinion/online-debate-forums-090700.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201030153504/https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/10/opinion/online-debate-forums-090700.html |archive-date=October 30, 2020 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=The New York Times}}</ref> The site also saw criticism in 2003 when a poster explained why they wished to see continued bloodshed in Iraq.<ref>{{cite news |last=Taranto |first=James |date=November 5, 2003 |title=Dems Gone Wild--III |url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110004262 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080526154756/http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110004262 |archive-date=May 26, 2008 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=The Wall Street Journal}}</ref>


== Copyright infringement lawsuit ==
The site also saw criticism when, in 2003, a poster explained why they wished to see continued bloodshed in Iraq.<ref name="demsgonewild">{{cite news| last=Taranto|first=James|title=Dems Gone Wild--III|publisher=]|date =2003-11-05|url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110004262|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080526154756/http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110004262|archive-date=May 26, 2008}}</ref>

==Copyright infringement lawsuit==
{{main|Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground LLC}} {{main|Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground LLC}}
In 2010, Democratic Underground was sued for alleged copyright infringement in a member's posting of a few paragraphs from an article in the '']''. The suit was brought by ], an entity that finds ''Review-Journal'' quotations online, buys the copyright for that story from the newspaper, and retroactively sues for copyright infringement.<ref>{{cite news |last=Green |first=Steve |date=August 11, 2010 |title=Righthaven sues Democratic Underground website over R-J posting |url=https://vegasinc.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/aug/11/righthaven-sues-democratic-underground-website-ove/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220512041503/https://vegasinc.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/aug/11/righthaven-sues-democratic-underground-website-ove/ |archive-date=May 12, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=Las Vegas Sun}}</ref> In response to the lawsuit, Democratic Underground asserted that the quoted excerpt (five sentences of a 54-sentence article) was ], and counterclaimed against Righthaven for ], ], and ]. Democratic Underground was represented in the case '']'' by the ], attorneys from the firm of ], and Las Vegas attorney Chad Bowers.<ref>{{cite news |last=Green |first=Steve |date=September 28, 2010 |title=R-J owner faces counterclaim in copyright lawsuit campaign |url=http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/sep/28/r-j-owner-faces-counterclaim-copyright-lawsuit-cam/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220512041502/https://vegasinc.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/sep/28/r-j-owner-faces-counterclaim-copyright-lawsuit-cam/ |archive-date=May 12, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=Las Vegas Sun}}</ref> After Righthaven lost a similar suit against ] over 8 of 30 sentences quoted from a news article, Righthaven asked the judge in the case against Democratic Underground to dismiss Righthaven's claim against Democratic Underground.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Kravets |first=David |date=November 18, 2010 |title=Righthaven Says It Will Stop Suing Over News Excerpts |url=https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/righthaven/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221014143122/http://www.wired.com/2010/11/righthaven/ |archive-date=October 14, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |magazine=Wired <!-- Threat Level -->}}</ref> On June 14, 2011, Judge ] ruled that Righthaven be dismissed from the case because Righthaven had never owned the copyright of the article and gave Righthaven two weeks to explain in writing why it should not be sanctioned.<ref>{{cite press release |date=June 14, 2011 |title=Righthaven Copyright Troll Lawsuit Dismissed as Sham |url=https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2011/06/14 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220925231523/https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2011/06/14 |archive-date=September 25, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |publisher=Electronic Frontier Foundation}}</ref>


== References ==
In 2010, Democratic Underground was sued for alleged copyright infringement in a member's posting of a few paragraphs from an article in the '']''. The suit was brought by ], an entity that finds ''Review-Journal'' quotations online, buys the copyright for that story from the newspaper, and retroactively sues for copyright infringement.<ref>{{Cite news | last = Green| first = Steve| title = Righthaven sues Democratic Underground website over R-J posting| newspaper = ]| location = ] | date = August 11, 2010| url = http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/aug/11/righthaven-sues-democratic-underground-website-ove/| access-date = 2010-10-08}}</ref> In response to the lawsuit, DU asserted that the quoted excerpt (five sentences of a 54-sentence article) was ], and counterclaimed against Righthaven for ], ], and ].<ref name="counterclaim">{{Cite news | last = Green| first = Steve| title = R-J owner faces counterclaim in copyright lawsuit campaign| newspaper = Las Vegas Sun| location = Las Vegas, Nevada| date = September 28, 2010| url = http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/sep/28/r-j-owner-faces-counterclaim-copyright-lawsuit-cam/ | access-date = 2010-10-08}}</ref> DU is being represented in the case '']'' by the ], attorneys from the firm of ], and Las Vegas attorney Chad Bowers.<ref name="counterclaim"/> After Righthaven lost a similar suit against ] over 8 of 30 sentences quoted from a news article, Righthaven asked the judge in the case against Democratic Underground to dismiss Righthaven's claim against DU.<ref name="wired">{{Cite news | last = Kravets| first = David| title = Righthaven Says It Will Stop Suing Over News Excerpts| newspaper = ], Threat Level| date = 18 Nov 2010| url = https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/righthaven/ }}</ref>
{{reflist}}


== External links ==
On June 14, 2011, Judge ] ruled that Righthaven be dismissed from the case because Righthaven had never owned the copyright of the article and gave Righthaven two weeks to explain in writing why it should not be sanctioned.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2011/06/14|title=Righthaven Copyright Troll Lawsuit Dismissed as Sham EFF Press Releases|date=June 14, 2011|website=]}}</ref>

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==External links==
* *
* on ] * on ]
* on ] * on ]


]
] ]
] ]
]

Revision as of 16:09, 9 January 2025

Online political community

Democratic Underground
HeadquartersUnited States
URLwww.democraticunderground.com
LaunchedJanuary 20, 2001; 23 years ago (2001-01-20)

Democratic Underground is an online community for members of the Democratic Party in the Unites States. Its membership is restricted by policy to those who are supportive of the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates for political office.

History

This section appears to be slanted towards recent events. Please try to keep recent events in historical perspective and add more content related to non-recent events. (February 2023)
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (October 2020)

Created on December 5, 2000, Democratic Underground was launched on January 20, 2001. It describes itself as a "grassroots left-of-center political community" and "an online community for friendly, politically liberal people who understand the importance of working together to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of American government". On Election Day 2016, the forum was hacked and rendered unavailable, which the site blamed on pro-Trump trolls.

Criticism

Discussions from posters at Democratic Underground have drawn criticism. One example of this was the dialog about the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami, in which a few posts explored the possibility of "earthquake weapons". The posts were reported on by John Schwartz on The New York Times and Brit Hume on Fox News. An administrator also sent a letter to The New York Times, which was printed. The site also saw criticism in 2003 when a poster explained why they wished to see continued bloodshed in Iraq.

Copyright infringement lawsuit

Main article: Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground LLC

In 2010, Democratic Underground was sued for alleged copyright infringement in a member's posting of a few paragraphs from an article in the Las Vegas Review-Journal. The suit was brought by Righthaven, an entity that finds Review-Journal quotations online, buys the copyright for that story from the newspaper, and retroactively sues for copyright infringement. In response to the lawsuit, Democratic Underground asserted that the quoted excerpt (five sentences of a 54-sentence article) was fair use, and counterclaimed against Righthaven for fraud, barratry, and champerty. Democratic Underground was represented in the case pro bono by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, attorneys from the firm of Winston & Strawn, and Las Vegas attorney Chad Bowers. After Righthaven lost a similar suit against Realty One Group over 8 of 30 sentences quoted from a news article, Righthaven asked the judge in the case against Democratic Underground to dismiss Righthaven's claim against Democratic Underground. On June 14, 2011, Judge Roger L. Hunt ruled that Righthaven be dismissed from the case because Righthaven had never owned the copyright of the article and gave Righthaven two weeks to explain in writing why it should not be sanctioned.

References

  1. "DemocraticUnderground.com WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info". Domain Tools. 2002. Archived from the original on November 22, 2018. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  2. "Terms of Service". Democratic Underground. 2012. Archived from the original on December 11, 2024. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  3. Leyden, John (November 10, 2016). "Left-wing cyber-hangout blames security breach on pro-Trump trolls". The Register. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  4. Schwartz, John (January 3, 2005). "Myths Run Wild in Blog Tsunami Debate". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 29, 2015. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  5. Hume, Brit (January 4, 2005). "Disaster's Cause?". Fox News. Archived from the original on October 31, 2020. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  6. Washington, David Allen (January 10, 2005). "Online Debate Forums". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  7. Taranto, James (November 5, 2003). "Dems Gone Wild--III". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on May 26, 2008. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  8. Green, Steve (August 11, 2010). "Righthaven sues Democratic Underground website over R-J posting". Las Vegas Sun. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  9. Green, Steve (September 28, 2010). "R-J owner faces counterclaim in copyright lawsuit campaign". Las Vegas Sun. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  10. Kravets, David (November 18, 2010). "Righthaven Says It Will Stop Suing Over News Excerpts". Wired. Archived from the original on October 14, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  11. "Righthaven Copyright Troll Lawsuit Dismissed as Sham" (Press release). Electronic Frontier Foundation. June 14, 2011. Archived from the original on September 25, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2025.

External links

Categories: