| Revision as of 23:30, 11 January 2025 editYapperbot (talk | contribs)Bots85,471 edits Feedback Request Service notification on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment (1/2 this month). You can unsubscribe at WP:FRS.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:55, 11 January 2025 edit undoSjones23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers102,349 edits →IP sock puppet evasion: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| ]Your feedback is requested  at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 23:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | ]Your feedback is requested  at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 23:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == IP sock puppet evasion == | |||
| That block evader who disrupted the ] article as {{IP|2.97.98.195}} is back again, this time as {{IP|2.97.219.149}}. Their IP address geolocates to the UK. Can you please look into this? Thanks, ] (] - ]) 23:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:55, 11 January 2025
 | SCAM WARNING!
If you have been contacted or solicited by anyone asking for payment to get a draft into article space, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article, such offers are not legitimate and you should contact paid-en-wp wikipedia.org immediately. Please see this page for more information. |
 | Welcome to my talk page!
|
 | Click here to email me. Emails sent through this form are private, however I may share their content privately with other users for administrative purposes. Please do not use {{ygm}} on this page: if you email me I will have already received an on-wiki notification. |
|
|
Archives: Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. | |
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
2025 Canadian federal election
Howdy. I'll start an RFC at the 2025 Canadian federal election page, if you'll formulate the RFC question. GoodDay (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: I'm confused. I think you just wrote that we don't need another RFC, but you're here saying I should start one, after I also tried to say that this doesn't need to be settled now since it'll all change in a few months anyway. I'm fully on board with respecting the result of the 2021 discussion until there's a reason to believe that something has changed, I'm just pushing for internal consistency in the article. Simonm223 is the one suggesting we should push an RFC now, maybe you should ask him. Ivanvector (/Edits) 20:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- The only other alternative, is to have Arkenstrone banned from the page. GoodDay (talk) 20:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- That seems like a pretty extreme reaction to an editor with a minor disagreement over this utterly insignificant point. Although one of their recent comments did seem like they're coming to this with an unreasonably positive view of the PPC's standing in 2025. Ivanvector (/Edits) 20:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) It's true, while Ivanvector and I know each other and are friends we don't always agree on Misplaced Pages topics. I suggested an RFC mostly because it seems like the argument is going around in circles regarding the interpretation of a four-year-old RfC. It seems like, if people are going to make this urgent, then a refreshed consensus makes sense. However I have no strong feelings one way or the other on including minor parties on the page TBH. Simonm223 (talk) 20:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- The only other alternative, is to have Arkenstrone banned from the page. GoodDay (talk) 20:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Talking about Juno cast
Look @Ivanvector, all I'm saying is, Juno is the mother of Juno's child, she's been pregnant for nine months BigStoneonWiki (talk) 02:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- @BigstoneonWiki: I understand what you're saying and I'm not disagreeing with you. It just doesn't need to be said that Juno is the mother of her own child. Ivanvector (/Edits) 07:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I don't want to argue with you, I just saying BigStoneonWiki (talk) 08:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Inquiry on the eligibility of a page on Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions
Gang rape#India has been subject to routine vandalism every month. Which you said doesn't qualify for it. Just to confirm, is this actually normal for wikipedia; the page is seriously meant to be like that forever? Random IPs can get their way for months unguarded? ContributedEditor (talk) 07:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ContributedEditor: Thanks for your question. One of Misplaced Pages's fundamental principles is that it is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. We always consider protection requests against that fundamental principle, and in general we only protect pages in response to active, ongoing disruption, when there is no better solution. Usually that means many disruptive edits by multiple editors in a short period of time, or it can mean a pattern of disruptive editing over a longer period of time. On gang rape I don't think either of those are happening: you found an error added several weeks earlier (so protection today would not help, in fact it might prevent someone else from fixing other errors), and before that I went back all the way to November to find just one edit that I thought was vandalism. I also don't think there's a pattern here, since the last time the article was protected was all the way back in 2023, and that was only for two days. You can read WP:PREEMPTIVE for more on this. Cheers! Ivanvector (/Edits) 20:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2025 Canadian federal election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
IP sock puppet evasion
That block evader who disrupted the Ron Howard article as 2.97.98.195 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is back again, this time as 2.97.219.149 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Their IP address geolocates to the UK. Can you please look into this? Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)