Revision as of 16:09, 9 January 2025 editDavide King (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users104,663 edits copyeditingTag: Visual edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:00, 12 January 2025 edit undoDavide King (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users104,663 edits copyediting, add issn to refsTag: Visual edit: SwitchedNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
⚫ | Created on December 5, 2000,<ref>{{cite web |date=2002 |title=DemocraticUnderground.com WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info |url=http://whois.domaintools.com/democraticunderground.com |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181122141755/http://whois.domaintools.com/democraticunderground.com |archive-date=November 22, 2018 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=Domain Tools}}</ref> Democratic Underground was launched on January 20, 2001, the day ] was inaugurated as United States president. It describes itself as a "grassroots ] political community" and "an online community for friendly, ] people who understand the importance of working together to elect more Democrats and fewer ] to all levels of American government".<ref>{{cite web |date=2012 |title=Terms of Service |url=https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20241211190359/https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice |archive-date=December 11, 2024 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |publisher=Democratic Underground}}</ref> | ||
{{recentism|section|date=February 2023}} | |||
{{expand section|date=October 2020}} | |||
⚫ | Created on December 5, 2000,<ref>{{cite web |date=2002 |title=DemocraticUnderground.com WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info |url=http://whois.domaintools.com/democraticunderground.com |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181122141755/http://whois.domaintools.com/democraticunderground.com |archive-date=November 22, 2018 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=Domain Tools}}</ref> Democratic Underground was launched on January 20, 2001. It describes itself as a "grassroots ] political community" and "an online community for friendly, ] people who understand the importance of working together to elect more Democrats and fewer ] to all levels of American government".<ref>{{cite web |date=2012 |title=Terms of Service |url=https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20241211190359/https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice |archive-date=December 11, 2024 |access-date=January 9, 2025 | |
||
⚫ | As of June 2008, over 122,000 user accounts were registered and over 38 million messages had been posted. Democratic Underground publishes articles several days a week and hosts an online store, a directory of links, and forums where members may post on various topics of interest. Discussions from posters at Democratic Underground attracted national attention. One example of this was the dialog about the ], in which a few posts explored the possibility of "]". The posts were reported by John Schwartz on '']'' and ] on ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Schwartz |first=John |date=January 3, 2005 |title=Myths Run Wild in Blog Tsunami Debate |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/03/world/worldspecial4/myths-run-wild-in-blog-tsunami-debate.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150529171240/http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/03/world/worldspecial4/myths-run-wild-in-blog-tsunami-debate.html |archive-date=May 29, 2015 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=The New York Times |issn=1553-8095}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Hume |first=Brit |date=January 4, 2005 |title=Disaster's Cause? |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/disasters-cause |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201031143648/https://www.foxnews.com/story/disasters-cause |archive-date=October 31, 2020 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |publisher=Fox News}}</ref> An administrator also sent a letter to ''The New York Times'', which was printed.<ref>{{cite news |last=Washington |first=David Allen |date=January 10, 2005 |title=Online Debate Forums |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/10/opinion/online-debate-forums-090700.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201030153504/https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/10/opinion/online-debate-forums-090700.html |archive-date=October 30, 2020 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=The New York Times |issn=1553-8095}}</ref> | ||
== Criticism == | |||
⚫ | Discussions from posters at Democratic Underground |
||
Earlier in 2003, the site attracted the attention of ] in '']'' when a poster explained why they wished to see continued bloodshed in Iraq.<ref>{{cite news |last=Taranto |first=James |date=November 5, 2003 |title=Dems Gone Wild--III |url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110004262 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080526154756/http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110004262 |archive-date=May 26, 2008 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=The Wall Street Journal |issn=1042-9840}}</ref> The forum was mentioned by Chuck Raasch of '']'' within the context of ] about the ] to blow up airliners between the United Kingdom and the United States. One poster suggested that one reason for why the liquids were banned on airplanes was to allow the airlines to significantly charge more money for their own beverages and that the American government's push to release the announcement of the plot was done to bump ]'s primary loss out of the news cycle.<ref>{{cite news |last=Raasch |first=Chuck |date=August 10, 2006 |title=Terrorists were brewing a fresh date of infamy |url=https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2006-08-10-raasch_x.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121003043340/https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2006-08-10-raasch_x.htm |archive-date=October 3, 2012 |access-date=January 12, 2025 |work=USA Today |issn=0734-7456}}</ref> On Election Day 2016, the forum was hacked and rendered unavailable, which the site blamed on ] trolls.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Leyden |first=John |date=November 10, 2016 |title=Left-wing cyber-hangout blames security breach on pro-Trump trolls |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/11/10/democrat_site_blames_pro_trump_hackers/ |access-date=January 9, 2025 |website=The Register}}</ref> | |||
== Copyright infringement lawsuit == | == Copyright infringement lawsuit == | ||
{{main|Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground LLC}} | {{main|Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground LLC}} | ||
In 2010, Democratic Underground was sued for alleged copyright infringement in a member's posting of a few paragraphs from an article in the '']''. The suit was brought by ], an entity that finds ''Review-Journal'' quotations online, buys the copyright for that story from the newspaper, and retroactively sues for copyright infringement.<ref>{{cite news |last=Green |first=Steve |date=August 11, 2010 |title=Righthaven sues Democratic Underground website over R-J posting |url=https://vegasinc.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/aug/11/righthaven-sues-democratic-underground-website-ove/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220512041503/https://vegasinc.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/aug/11/righthaven-sues-democratic-underground-website-ove/ |archive-date=May 12, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=Las Vegas Sun}}</ref> In response to the lawsuit, Democratic Underground asserted that the quoted excerpt (five sentences of a 54-sentence article) was ], and counterclaimed against Righthaven for ], ], and ]. Democratic Underground was represented in the case '']'' by the ], attorneys from the firm of ], and Las Vegas attorney Chad Bowers.<ref>{{cite news |last=Green |first=Steve |date=September 28, 2010 |title=R-J owner faces counterclaim in copyright lawsuit campaign |url=http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/sep/28/r-j-owner-faces-counterclaim-copyright-lawsuit-cam/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220512041502/https://vegasinc.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/sep/28/r-j-owner-faces-counterclaim-copyright-lawsuit-cam/ |archive-date=May 12, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=Las Vegas Sun}}</ref> After Righthaven lost a similar suit against ] over 8 of 30 sentences quoted from a news article, Righthaven asked the judge in the case against Democratic Underground to dismiss Righthaven's claim against Democratic Underground.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Kravets |first=David |date=November 18, 2010 |title=Righthaven Says It Will Stop Suing Over News Excerpts |url=https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/righthaven/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221014143122/http://www.wired.com/2010/11/righthaven/ |archive-date=October 14, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |magazine=Wired <!-- Threat Level -->}}</ref> On June 14, 2011, Judge ] ruled that Righthaven be dismissed from the case because Righthaven had never owned the copyright of the article and gave Righthaven two weeks to explain in writing why it should not be sanctioned.<ref>{{cite press release |date=June 14, 2011 |title=Righthaven Copyright Troll Lawsuit Dismissed as Sham |url=https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2011/06/14 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220925231523/https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2011/06/14 |archive-date=September 25, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |publisher=Electronic Frontier Foundation}}</ref> | In 2010, Democratic Underground was sued for alleged copyright infringement in a member's posting of a few paragraphs from an article in the '']''. The suit was brought by ], an entity that finds ''Las Vegas Review-Journal'' quotations online, buys the copyright for that story from the newspaper, and retroactively sues for copyright infringement.<ref>{{cite news |last=Green |first=Steve |date=August 11, 2010 |title=Righthaven sues Democratic Underground website over R-J posting |url=https://vegasinc.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/aug/11/righthaven-sues-democratic-underground-website-ove/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220512041503/https://vegasinc.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/aug/11/righthaven-sues-democratic-underground-website-ove/ |archive-date=May 12, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=Las Vegas Sun |issn=2639-9083}}</ref> In response to the lawsuit, Democratic Underground asserted that the quoted excerpt (five sentences of a 54-sentence article) was ], and counterclaimed against Righthaven for ], ], and ]. Democratic Underground was represented in the case '']'' by the ], attorneys from the firm of ], and Las Vegas attorney Chad Bowers.<ref>{{cite news |last=Green |first=Steve |date=September 28, 2010 |title=R-J owner faces counterclaim in copyright lawsuit campaign |url=http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/sep/28/r-j-owner-faces-counterclaim-copyright-lawsuit-cam/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220512041502/https://vegasinc.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/sep/28/r-j-owner-faces-counterclaim-copyright-lawsuit-cam/ |archive-date=May 12, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |work=Las Vegas Sun}}</ref> After Righthaven lost a similar suit against ] over 8 of 30 sentences quoted from a news article, Righthaven asked the judge in the case against Democratic Underground to dismiss Righthaven's claim against Democratic Underground.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Kravets |first=David |date=November 18, 2010 |title=Righthaven Says It Will Stop Suing Over News Excerpts |url=https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/righthaven/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221014143122/http://www.wired.com/2010/11/righthaven/ |archive-date=October 14, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |magazine=Wired <!-- Threat Level --> |issn=1078-3148}}</ref> On June 14, 2011, Judge ] ruled that Righthaven be dismissed from the case because Righthaven had never owned the copyright of the article and gave Righthaven two weeks to explain in writing why it should not be sanctioned.<ref>{{cite press release |date=June 14, 2011 |title=Righthaven Copyright Troll Lawsuit Dismissed as Sham |url=https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2011/06/14 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220925231523/https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2011/06/14 |archive-date=September 25, 2022 |access-date=January 9, 2025 |publisher=Electronic Frontier Foundation}}</ref> | ||
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 13:00, 12 January 2025
Online political community
Headquarters | United States |
---|---|
URL | www |
Launched | January 20, 2001; 23 years ago (2001-01-20) |
Democratic Underground is an online community for members of the Democratic Party in the Unites States. Its membership is restricted by policy to those who are supportive of the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates for political office.
History
Created on December 5, 2000, Democratic Underground was launched on January 20, 2001, the day George W. Bush was inaugurated as United States president. It describes itself as a "grassroots left-of-center political community" and "an online community for friendly, politically liberal people who understand the importance of working together to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of American government".
As of June 2008, over 122,000 user accounts were registered and over 38 million messages had been posted. Democratic Underground publishes articles several days a week and hosts an online store, a directory of links, and forums where members may post on various topics of interest. Discussions from posters at Democratic Underground attracted national attention. One example of this was the dialog about the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami, in which a few posts explored the possibility of "earthquake weapons". The posts were reported by John Schwartz on The New York Times and Brit Hume on Fox News. An administrator also sent a letter to The New York Times, which was printed.
Earlier in 2003, the site attracted the attention of James Taranto in The Wall Street Journal when a poster explained why they wished to see continued bloodshed in Iraq. The forum was mentioned by Chuck Raasch of USA Today within the context of conspiracy theories about the August 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot to blow up airliners between the United Kingdom and the United States. One poster suggested that one reason for why the liquids were banned on airplanes was to allow the airlines to significantly charge more money for their own beverages and that the American government's push to release the announcement of the plot was done to bump Joe Lieberman's primary loss out of the news cycle. On Election Day 2016, the forum was hacked and rendered unavailable, which the site blamed on pro-Trump trolls.
Copyright infringement lawsuit
Main article: Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground LLCIn 2010, Democratic Underground was sued for alleged copyright infringement in a member's posting of a few paragraphs from an article in the Las Vegas Review-Journal. The suit was brought by Righthaven, an entity that finds Las Vegas Review-Journal quotations online, buys the copyright for that story from the newspaper, and retroactively sues for copyright infringement. In response to the lawsuit, Democratic Underground asserted that the quoted excerpt (five sentences of a 54-sentence article) was fair use, and counterclaimed against Righthaven for fraud, barratry, and champerty. Democratic Underground was represented in the case pro bono by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, attorneys from the firm of Winston & Strawn, and Las Vegas attorney Chad Bowers. After Righthaven lost a similar suit against Realty One Group over 8 of 30 sentences quoted from a news article, Righthaven asked the judge in the case against Democratic Underground to dismiss Righthaven's claim against Democratic Underground. On June 14, 2011, Judge Roger L. Hunt ruled that Righthaven be dismissed from the case because Righthaven had never owned the copyright of the article and gave Righthaven two weeks to explain in writing why it should not be sanctioned.
References
- "DemocraticUnderground.com WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info". Domain Tools. 2002. Archived from the original on November 22, 2018. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
- "Terms of Service". Democratic Underground. 2012. Archived from the original on December 11, 2024. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
- Schwartz, John (January 3, 2005). "Myths Run Wild in Blog Tsunami Debate". The New York Times. ISSN 1553-8095. Archived from the original on May 29, 2015. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
- Hume, Brit (January 4, 2005). "Disaster's Cause?". Fox News. Archived from the original on October 31, 2020. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
- Washington, David Allen (January 10, 2005). "Online Debate Forums". The New York Times. ISSN 1553-8095. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
- Taranto, James (November 5, 2003). "Dems Gone Wild--III". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 1042-9840. Archived from the original on May 26, 2008. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
- Raasch, Chuck (August 10, 2006). "Terrorists were brewing a fresh date of infamy". USA Today. ISSN 0734-7456. Archived from the original on October 3, 2012. Retrieved January 12, 2025.
- Leyden, John (November 10, 2016). "Left-wing cyber-hangout blames security breach on pro-Trump trolls". The Register. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
- Green, Steve (August 11, 2010). "Righthaven sues Democratic Underground website over R-J posting". Las Vegas Sun. ISSN 2639-9083. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
- Green, Steve (September 28, 2010). "R-J owner faces counterclaim in copyright lawsuit campaign". Las Vegas Sun. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
- Kravets, David (November 18, 2010). "Righthaven Says It Will Stop Suing Over News Excerpts". Wired. ISSN 1078-3148. Archived from the original on October 14, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
- "Righthaven Copyright Troll Lawsuit Dismissed as Sham" (Press release). Electronic Frontier Foundation. June 14, 2011. Archived from the original on September 25, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
External links
- Democratic Underground homepage
- Democratic Underground on Facebook
- Democratic Underground on Twitter