| Revision as of 20:52, 14 January 2025 editCerebral726 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,229 edits Caution: Likely factual errors (RW 16.1)Tag: RW← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:53, 14 January 2025 edit undoCerebral726 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,229 edits Notice: Edit warring softer wording for newcomers (RW 16.1)Tag: RWNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to ]. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been ]. If you believe the information you added was correct, please ] or discuss the changes on the article's ] before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-error2 --> ]] 20:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | ] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to ]. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been ]. If you believe the information you added was correct, please ] or discuss the changes on the article's ] before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-error2 --> ]] 20:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ] Hi Baldoz! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of ] several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the ] disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable. | |||
| All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article ] to try to reach ]. If you are unable to agree at ], please use one of the ] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ]] 20:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:53, 14 January 2025
January 2025
Hello, I'm Cerebral726. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Scuderia Ferrari have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Cerebral726 (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to McLaren. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Cerebral726 (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Baldoz! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Liam Gallagher several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Liam Gallagher, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Cerebral726 (talk) 20:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)