Revision as of 22:14, 14 January 2025 editJunsik1223 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,792 edits →Paleocology← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:33, 14 January 2025 edit undoSlvrHwk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,648 edits CladogramNext edit → | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
] and left ] of the ''Tameryraptor'' holotype]] | ] and left ] of the ''Tameryraptor'' holotype]] | ||
The pelvis was incomplete, containing both ] and the left ]. The ischium is uniquely pointed almost directly horizontally. The pubes were likely nearly {{Convert|1|m|ft}} when fully preserved, with thin shafts that were transversely expanded at the anterior ends where they connected, creating a V-shape in anterior view. Both femora in addition to the left fibula were recovered, the former element being one of the largest recorded from a theropod at {{Convert|1.26|m|ft}} in length. Its femora lacked strong curvature. The ] is small but has a notable protrusion, which would attach to the ] muscle of the tail. Its fibula was only {{Convert|88|cm}} long, around 1/3rd the length of the femora. The anterior end was triangular in lateral view with bulging ]s whereas the posterior end is rounded.<ref name="Stromer1931" /><ref name="Tameryraptor "/> | The pelvis was incomplete, containing both ] and the left ]. The ischium is uniquely pointed almost directly horizontally. The pubes were likely nearly {{Convert|1|m|ft}} when fully preserved, with thin shafts that were transversely expanded at the anterior ends where they connected, creating a V-shape in anterior view. Both femora in addition to the left fibula were recovered, the former element being one of the largest recorded from a theropod at {{Convert|1.26|m|ft}} in length. Its femora lacked strong curvature. The ] is small but has a notable protrusion, which would attach to the ] muscle of the tail. Its fibula was only {{Convert|88|cm}} long, around 1/3rd the length of the femora. The anterior end was triangular in lateral view with bulging ]s whereas the posterior end is rounded.<ref name="Stromer1931" /><ref name="Tameryraptor "/> | ||
== In their ], Kellermann, Cuesta & Rauhut (2025) recovered ''Tameryraptor'' as a non-carcharodontosaurine member of the ]. Their analyses found support for a ] relationship of carcharodontosaurids and ]s, which the authors named as a new clade, ]. The results of their analysis using merged OTUs (operational taxonomic units) is displayed in the ] below:<ref name="Tameryraptor "/> | |||
{{clade | |||
|{{clade | |||
|1=] <div style="{{MirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|label2=] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|1='']'' | |||
|2='']'' }} | |||
|3={{clade | |||
|1='']'' <div style="{{MirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='''''Tameryraptor''''' <div style="{{MirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1=''] iguidensis'' | |||
|label2=] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|1='']'' | |||
|2=''Carcharodontosaurus saharicus'' <div style="{{MirrorH}}">]</div> }} | |||
|label3=] | |||
|3={{clade | |||
|1='']'' <div style="{{MirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' <div style="{{MirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|2='']'' <div style="{{MirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}|label1=]}} | |||
== Paleocology == | == Paleocology == |
Revision as of 22:33, 14 January 2025
Genus of carcharodontosaurid dinosaurs
Tameryraptor Temporal range: Late Cretaceous, Cenomanian PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N | |
---|---|
Photograph of the holotype before its destruction in 1944 | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Clade: | Dinosauria |
Clade: | Saurischia |
Clade: | Theropoda |
Clade: | †Carcharodontosauria |
Family: | †Carcharodontosauridae |
Genus: | †Tameryraptor Kellermann, Cuesta & Rauhut, 2025 |
Species: | †T. markgrafi |
Binomial name | |
†Tameryraptor markgrafi Kellermann, Cuesta & Rauhut, 2025 |
Tameryraptor ("thief from the beloved land") is an extinct genus of large carcharodontosaurid theropod dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian age) Bahariya Formation of Egypt. The genus contains a single species, T. markgrafi. The holotype specimen was historically assigned to the genus Carcharodontosaurus, and it was destroyed in a bombing during the Second World War in 1944.
Discovery and naming
In early April of 1914, theropod fossils were found in marls near Ain Gedid, Egypt by Austro-Hungarian paleontologist Richard Markgraf. The sediments from this region derive from the Cenomanian-aged Bahariya Formation, one of many Cretaceous-aged sites of North Africa. Markgraf extensively collected dinosaur skeletons in Bahariya for his employer, German paleontologist Ernst Stromer of the Paläontologisches Museum München (Bavarian State Collection of Paleontology). This Egyptian skeleton (SNSB-BSPG 1922 X 46) consisted of a partial skull, including much of the braincase, teeth, three cervical vertebrae and a caudal vertebra, a partial pelvis, a manual ungual, both femora, and the left fibula.
Due to political tensions between the German Empire and then British-owned Egypt, this specimen took years to get to Germany. It was not until 1922 that the bones were transported to Munich where Stromer described them in 1931. Stromer recognized that the teeth of this specimen matched the characteristic dentition of those described by Depéret and Savornin in 1925 for their new species "Megalosaurus" saharicus. He found it necessary to erect a new genus for this species, Carcharodontosaurus. World War II broke out in 1939, leading to SNSB-BSPG 1922 X 46 and other Bahariya material to be destroyed during a British bombing raid on Munich during the night of April 24/25, 1944. An endocast was made that survived the war, making it the only remaining relic of the specimen.
In 2025, Kellermann, Cuesta & Rauhut described Tameryraptor markgrafi as a new genus and species of carcharodontosaurid theropods based on these fossil remains. Since the fossil remains were destroyed, they established their description based on an archival photograph. The generic name, Tameryraptor, combines Ta-mery, an informal ancient Egyptian name for the country—meaning "beloved land"—with the Latin word "raptor", meaning "thief". The specific name, markgrafi, honors Richard Markgraf, the discoverer of the remains.
Description
In 1931, Stromer estimated that the Tameryraptor holotype represented an individual similar in size to the tyrannosaurid Gorgosaurus, which has been estimated at 8 metres (26 ft) in length. Tameryraptor is characterized by a small horn-like protrusion among other rugosities on its snout.
The Tameryraptor holotype was initially interpreted as one of the most complete postcranial specimens of Carcharodontosaurus. This specimen preserved three cervical vertebrae, which were weathered severely. One is the axis and the other two are articulated anterior cervicals that are larger than the axis. The cervical vertebrae, similar to the related Giganotosaurus, are topped by low neural spines joined with sturdy transverse processes which hung over the pleurocoels (shallow depressions on the sides of centra), which would contain pneumatic air sacs to lighten the vertebrae. The centra of these vertebrae are adorned by keels along their ventral sides. An anterior caudal vertebra was also known, which was platycoelous (flat anterior and posterior ends) and short. This caudal was incomplete, missing much of the neural spine, but had diapophyses that would conjugate with the chevrons. The sides of its centrum were pleurocoelus as well. A haemal arch was preserved in this individual as well.
The pelvis was incomplete, containing both pubes and the left ischium. The ischium is uniquely pointed almost directly horizontally. The pubes were likely nearly 1 metre (3.3 ft) when fully preserved, with thin shafts that were transversely expanded at the anterior ends where they connected, creating a V-shape in anterior view. Both femora in addition to the left fibula were recovered, the former element being one of the largest recorded from a theropod at 1.26 metres (4.1 ft) in length. Its femora lacked strong curvature. The greater trochanter is small but has a notable protrusion, which would attach to the m. caudofemoralis longus muscle of the tail. Its fibula was only 88 centimetres (35 in) long, around 1/3rd the length of the femora. The anterior end was triangular in lateral view with bulging condyles whereas the posterior end is rounded.
== In their phylogenetic analyses, Kellermann, Cuesta & Rauhut (2025) recovered Tameryraptor as a non-carcharodontosaurine member of the Carcharodontosauridae. Their analyses found support for a sister taxon relationship of carcharodontosaurids and metriacanthosaurids, which the authors named as a new clade, Carcharodontosauriformes. The results of their analysis using merged OTUs (operational taxonomic units) is displayed in the cladogram below:
Carcharodontosauriformes |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paleocology
North Africa during the Cenomanian stage of the Late Cretaceous bordered the Tethys Sea, which transformed the region into a mangrove-dominated coastal environment filled with vast tidal flats and waterways. Tameryvenator lived in the Bahariya Formation, then a wetland environment. Contemporary abelisaurid dinosaurs were also terrestrial carnivores, preying on other terrestrial fauna. The coeval Spinosaurus, also known from the Kem Kem beds, may have primarily been a piscivore, consuming aquatic prey as evidenced by specimens of the sawskate Onchopristis being associated with the jaws of Spinosaurus. Some sauropods are also known from the Bahariya Formation such as Paralititan and Aegyptosaurus.
References
- Sereno, Paul C.; Dutheil, Didier B.; Iarochene, M.; Larsson, Hans C. E.; Lyon, Gabrielle H.; Magwene, Paul M.; Sidor, Christian A.; Varricchio, David J.; Wilson, Jeffrey A. (1996). "Predatory Dinosaurs from the Sahara and Late Cretaceous Faunal Differentiation" (PDF). Science. 272 (5264): 986–991. Bibcode:1996Sci...272..986S. doi:10.1126/science.272.5264.986. PMID 8662584. S2CID 39658297.
- ^ Ibrahim, Nizar; Sereno, Paul C.; Varricchio, David J.; Martill, David M.; Dutheil, Didier B.; Unwin, David M.; Baidder, Lahssen; Larsson, Hans C. E.; Zouhri, Samir; Kaoukaya, Abdelhadi (2020). "Geology and paleontology of the Upper Cretaceous Kem Kem Group of eastern Morocco". ZooKeys (928): 1–216. Bibcode:2020ZooK..928....1I. doi:10.3897/zookeys.928.47517. PMC 7188693. PMID 32362741.
- ^ Stromer, Ernst (1931). "Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers in den Wüsten Ägyptens. II. Wirbeltier-Reste der Baharîjestufe (unterstes Cenoman). 10. Ein Skelett-Rest von Carcharodontosaurus nov. gen" (PDF). Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung. Neue Folge (in German). 9: 1–23.
- ^ Kellermann, Maximilian; Cuesta, Elena; Rauhut, Oliver W. M. (2025-01-14). "Re-evaluation of the Bahariya Formation carcharodontosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) and its implications for allosauroid phylogeny". PLOS One. 20 (1): e0311096. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311096. ISSN 1932-6203.
- Smith, Joshua B.; Lamanna, Matthew C.; Mayr, Helmut; Lacovara, Kenneth J. (2006). "New information regarding the holotype of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus Stromer, 1915". Journal of Paleontology. 80 (2): 400–406. doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2006)080[0400:NIRTHO]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 130989487.
- "Nothdurft, William; Smith, Josh (2002). The Lost Dinosaurs of Egypt. New York: Random House Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-58836-117-2.
- Paul, Gregory S. (2016). The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs. Princeton University Press. pp. 103–104. ISBN 978-1-78684-190-2. OCLC 985402380.
- Wanas, Hamdalla A.; Assal, Ehab M. (March 2021). "Provenance, tectonic setting and source area-paleoweathering of sandstones of the Bahariya Formation in the Bahariya Oasis, Egypt: An implication to paleoclimate and paleogeography of the southern Neo-Tethys region during Early Cenomanian". Sedimentary Geology. 413: 105822. Bibcode:2021SedG..41305822W. doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2020.105822.
- Salem, Belal S.; Lamanna, Matthew C.; O'Connor, Patrick M.; El-Qot, Gamal M.; Shaker, Fatma; Thabet, Wael A.; El-Sayed, Sanaa; Sallam, Hesham M. (2022). "First definitive record of Abelisauridae (Theropoda: Ceratosauria) from the Cretaceous Bahariya Formation, Bahariya Oasis, Western Desert of Egypt". Royal Society Open Science. 9 (6): 220106. Bibcode:2022RSOS....920106S. doi:10.1098/rsos.220106. PMC 9174736. PMID 35706658.
- dal Sasso, C.; Maganuco, S.; Buffetaut, E.; Mendez, M.A. (2005). "New information on the skull of the enigmatic theropod Spinosaurus, with remarks on its sizes and affinities". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 25 (4): 888–896. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0888:NIOTSO]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 85702490.
- Ibrahim, N.; Sereno, P.C.; Varrachio, D.J.; Martill, D.M.; Unwin, D.M.; Baidder, L.; Larsson, H.C.E.; Zouhri, S.; Kaoukaya, U. (2020). "Geology and paleontology of the Upper Cretaceous Kem Kem Group of eastern Morocco". ZooKeys (928): 1–216. Bibcode:2020ZooK..928....1I. doi:10.3897/zookeys.928.47517. PMC 7188693. PMID 32362741.
- Smith, Joshua B.; Lamanna, Matthew C.; Lacovara, Kenneth J.; Dodson, Peter; Smith, Jennifer R.; Poole, Jason C.; Giegengack, Robert; Attia, Yousry (2001). "A Giant Sauropod Dinosaur from an Upper Cretaceous Mangrove Deposit in Egypt" (PDF). Science. 292 (5522): 1704–1706. Bibcode:2001Sci...292.1704S. doi:10.1126/science.1060561. PMID 11387472. S2CID 33454060.