Misplaced Pages

User talk:とある白い猫: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:03, 23 April 2005 editDavenbelle (talk | contribs)3,206 edits an entirely obvious personal attack← Previous edit Revision as of 07:04, 23 April 2005 edit undoDavenbelle (talk | contribs)3,206 editsm →Not quiteNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
I dont see that as a personal attack, you are welcome to fill a complaint though. Please stop reverting a topic which you are not a part of the discussion. There are things we agreed in the disucssion(s) and agreements long before I arrived at the article. Ignoring concensius is not good practice and waistes my and your time. --] ] 06:49, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) I dont see that as a personal attack, you are welcome to fill a complaint though. Please stop reverting a topic which you are not a part of the discussion. There are things we agreed in the disucssion(s) and agreements long before I arrived at the article. Ignoring concensius is not good practice and waistes my and your time. --] ] 06:49, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)


: Well I see it as an entirely obvious one; and I not that you archived your talk page within minutes of my first posting it here. — ] 07:03, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC) : Well I see it as an entirely obvious one; and I note that you archived your talk page within minutes of my first posting it here. — ] 07:03, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:04, 23 April 2005

User:Coolcat/Talk Template

User posts: 8 January 2025

an entirely obvious personal attack

"Stop being silly, do you have some sort of sick wet dream to stare at a dead naked woman? Or do you enjoy staring at dead chineese? Not everyone likes to see the pictures, but people can read." — Davenbelle 06:47, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

Not quite

I dont see that as a personal attack, you are welcome to fill a complaint though. Please stop reverting a topic which you are not a part of the discussion. There are things we agreed in the disucssion(s) and agreements long before I arrived at the article. Ignoring concensius is not good practice and waistes my and your time. --Cool Cat 06:49, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well I see it as an entirely obvious one; and I note that you archived your talk page within minutes of my first posting it here. — Davenbelle 07:03, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)