Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/List of alleged contactees: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:51, 5 May 2007 editNima Baghaei (talk | contribs)15,473 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 13:06, 5 May 2007 edit undoDoc glasgow (talk | contribs)26,084 edits rNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


*'''Keep''' - this article list alleged UFO contactees based on their own articles, so I am not sure why this is a bad article, its a great place for those interested to get a list of alleged contactees (note i created this article on) (:O) -] <sup>] · ] · ]</sup> 12:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC) *'''Keep''' - this article list alleged UFO contactees based on their own articles, so I am not sure why this is a bad article, its a great place for those interested to get a list of alleged contactees (note i created this article on) (:O) -] <sup>] · ] · ]</sup> 12:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
:It is unneccessary. The same information can be obtained by the ]. And your article doesn't have any citation to defend inclusion, whereas people are added to the category by categorising the articles themselves, which doubtless are cited.--]<sup>g</sup> 13:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:06, 5 May 2007

List of alleged contactees

List of alleged contactees (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

We already have a category Category:Contactees. That's as it should be, because what goes in the category is decided by each article so categorrised. A list like this is a problem as it is unreferenced and thus a potential WP:BLP nightmare. Best to delete this and leave the category. -Doc 10:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep - this article list alleged UFO contactees based on their own articles, so I am not sure why this is a bad article, its a great place for those interested to get a list of alleged contactees (note i created this article on) (:O) -Nima Baghaei 12:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
It is unneccessary. The same information can be obtained by the Category:Contactees. And your article doesn't have any citation to defend inclusion, whereas people are added to the category by categorising the articles themselves, which doubtless are cited.--Doc 13:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Categories: