| Revision as of 14:06, 5 May 2007 editNima Baghaei (talk | contribs)15,473 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:07, 5 May 2007 edit undoDoc glasgow (talk | contribs)26,084 edits →[]: rNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| **Sorry, BLP prohibits that. All negative assertions about a livign person, which this is, need referenced in the article itself. Otherwise it would be too easy to add someone to the list without any citations and it not to be spotted. Still, I'm not hearing how this helps us when we have a category?--]<sup>g</sup> 14:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | **Sorry, BLP prohibits that. All negative assertions about a livign person, which this is, need referenced in the article itself. Otherwise it would be too easy to add someone to the list without any citations and it not to be spotted. Still, I'm not hearing how this helps us when we have a category?--]<sup>g</sup> 14:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :* The article really helps clarify and make it easy access for those interested, and I feel adds to the ] (:O) -] <sup>] · ] · ]</sup> 14:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | :* The article really helps clarify and make it easy access for those interested, and I feel adds to the ] (:O) -] <sup>] · ] · ]</sup> 14:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::*Yes, you've said that. Now tell me how?--]<sup>g</sup> 14:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:07, 5 May 2007
List of alleged contactees
- List of alleged contactees (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
We already have a category Category:Contactees. That's as it should be, because what goes in the category is decided by each article so categorrised. A list like this is a problem as it is unreferenced and thus a potential WP:BLP nightmare. Best to delete this and leave the category. -Doc 10:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom - "alleged" =/= reliable sources. Will 11:45, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - this article list alleged UFO contactees based on their own articles, so I am not sure why this is a bad article, its a great place for those interested to get a list of alleged contactees (note i created this article on) (:O) -Nima Baghaei 12:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- It is unneccessary. The same information can be obtained by the Category:Contactees. And your article doesn't have any citation to defend inclusion, whereas people are added to the category by categorising the articles themselves, which doubtless are cited.--Doc 13:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- the citation is in their own articles, i just go back and list them here for easier access (:O) -Nima Baghaei 13:55, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, BLP prohibits that. All negative assertions about a livign person, which this is, need referenced in the article itself. Otherwise it would be too easy to add someone to the list without any citations and it not to be spotted. Still, I'm not hearing how this helps us when we have a category?--Doc 14:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- The article really helps clarify and make it easy access for those interested, and I feel adds to the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Paranormal (:O) -Nima Baghaei 14:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, you've said that. Now tell me how?--Doc 14:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)