| Revision as of 20:28, 6 May 2007 editElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,960 edits Moving disagreement to talk | Revision as of 20:41, 6 May 2007 edit undoDavid Gerard (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators213,090 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Wording== | ==Wording== | ||
| Under "purpose", David Gerard prefers the wording, "You might be wrong!" Two other editors prefer, "You might be wrong about whether or not you really have a consensus, and you will be held responsible for anything you do, regardless of the IRC discussion that preceded it." Anyone else have an opinion? --]]] 20:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | Under "purpose", David Gerard prefers the wording, "You might be wrong!" Two other editors prefer, "You might be wrong about whether or not you really have a consensus, and you will be held responsible for anything you do, regardless of the IRC discussion that preceded it." Anyone else have an opinion? --]]] 20:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Under "purpose", one of the channel wizards worded it a given way, and zero channel wizards disputed this - ] 20:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:41, 6 May 2007
Wording
Under "purpose", David Gerard prefers the wording, "You might be wrong!" Two other editors prefer, "You might be wrong about whether or not you really have a consensus, and you will be held responsible for anything you do, regardless of the IRC discussion that preceded it." Anyone else have an opinion? --Elonka 20:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Under "purpose", one of the channel wizards worded it a given way, and zero channel wizards disputed this - David Gerard 20:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)