Misplaced Pages

User talk:Canterberry: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:49, 13 May 2007 editCanterberry (talk | contribs)1,036 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 13:51, 13 May 2007 edit undoCanterberry (talk | contribs)1,036 edits Please assume good faithNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
This comment to an unregistered user shows an appalling lack of good faith. They may have a different opinion to you, but that is no reason to accuse them of vandalism. Your logic seems to be that "this user is unregistered; most vandals are unregistered; therefore this user is a vandal" is akin to "Canterberry has no user page; most vandals have no user page, therefore...". All users have the right to remain anonymous, and to have differring opinions. Please respect this in future.&nbsp;&ndash; ]<small> ]</small> 22:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC) This comment to an unregistered user shows an appalling lack of good faith. They may have a different opinion to you, but that is no reason to accuse them of vandalism. Your logic seems to be that "this user is unregistered; most vandals are unregistered; therefore this user is a vandal" is akin to "Canterberry has no user page; most vandals have no user page, therefore...". All users have the right to remain anonymous, and to have differring opinions. Please respect this in future.&nbsp;&ndash; ]<small> ]</small> 22:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


:Your comment constitutes ] and does not conform to ]. Your appalling comments shall be recorded here for reference should I need to make a complaint to WP about your actions. ] 13:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC) :Your comment constitutes ] and does not conform to ]. Your appalling comments shall be recorded here for reference should I need to make a complaint to WP about your actions. ] has a record of vandalism (see ]), which I considered, but which you ignored. Your actions represent the unacceptable side of WP, and I look forward to receiving your apology. ] 13:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:51, 13 May 2007

I decided to stop contibuting to WP. This place does my head in with all the arguments. Canterberry 11:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

I have now decided to become a "reviewer" of recent edits. From what I have seen, this enables me to submit my "2p" worth, but without having to contribute to any articles, or get involved in edit wars. Canterberry 12:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


Please assume good faith

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on User_talk:82.45.163.4. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

This comment to an unregistered user shows an appalling lack of good faith. They may have a different opinion to you, but that is no reason to accuse them of vandalism. Your logic seems to be that "this user is unregistered; most vandals are unregistered; therefore this user is a vandal" is akin to "Canterberry has no user page; most vandals have no user page, therefore...". All users have the right to remain anonymous, and to have differring opinions. Please respect this in future. – Tivedshambo (talk) 22:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Your comment constitutes WP:PA and does not conform to WP:CIVIL. Your appalling comments shall be recorded here for reference should I need to make a complaint to WP about your actions. User:82.45.163.4 has a record of vandalism (see User_talk:82.45.163.4), which I considered, but which you ignored. Your actions represent the unacceptable side of WP, and I look forward to receiving your apology. Canterberry 13:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)