| Revision as of 20:13, 6 May 2005 editBradBeattie (talk | contribs)6,888 edits response← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:16, 6 May 2005 edit undoBradBeattie (talk | contribs)6,888 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| : How about <math>\frac{999\ldots}{1000\ldots}</math>? Might want to take a look at limits. | : How about <math>\frac{999\ldots}{1000\ldots}</math>? Might want to take a look at ]. --] 20:16, 6 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:16, 6 May 2005
I created this page in response to two threads I saw and the confusion that arose. Figured it was something worth noting. --BradBeattie 18:58, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
- I think you are right. I submitted it first for deletion because the title looked a bit misleading. This is not a series of nines, the series is if you wish of
Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov 19:01, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
True, the title was a little slap-dash. Thanks for the improvement. --BradBeattie 19:03, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
"In mathematics, one could easily fall in the trap of thinking that while 0.999... is certainly close to 1, nevertheless the two are not equal. Here's a proof that they actually are."
0,999... is irrational and so is the article. Basis on "the proof" that 0.9999...=1 one could argue that irrational is rational which is simply jargon.
- How about ? Might want to take a look at limits. --BradBeattie 20:16, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
? Might want to take a look at