Misplaced Pages

User talk:Hamedog: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:02, 27 May 2007 editHamedog (talk | contribs)6,208 edits Warning: soz← Previous edit Revision as of 04:08, 27 May 2007 edit undoGnangarra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers28,454 edits Warning: officially warning on disruptive behaviorNext edit →
Line 47: Line 47:
:::I am aware of slander and libel but I don't think Australian Law applies in this situation as the offence technically occurs in Florida, coming under United States Law (as Misplaced Pages's servers are hosted there). On what grounds would I be blocked? As far as I am aware I have just made an inquirey into the events that occured on the talk page of an article I have made major contributions too (a mouthful!).--<small>]<sub>]</sub>|<sup>]</sup></small> 03:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC) :::I am aware of slander and libel but I don't think Australian Law applies in this situation as the offence technically occurs in Florida, coming under United States Law (as Misplaced Pages's servers are hosted there). On what grounds would I be blocked? As far as I am aware I have just made an inquirey into the events that occured on the talk page of an article I have made major contributions too (a mouthful!).--<small>]<sub>]</sub>|<sup>]</sup></small> 03:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
::::Having read ], I take back some of the comments made earlier. But I have not made claims that could be regarded as libel (at least not recently :P)--<small>]<sub>]</sub>|<sup>]</sup></small> 04:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC) ::::Having read ], I take back some of the comments made earlier. But I have not made claims that could be regarded as libel (at least not recently :P)--<small>]<sub>]</sub>|<sup>]</sup></small> 04:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::you asked about the willkca comments, They are why I have referred to those links, I have ask you to cease I'm now officially warning you that continuation of this is disruptive and are asking people to violate Australian law as that article link indicates. I am also requesting that you move this discussion to your current archive once you have read this message. ]] 04:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:08, 27 May 2007

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 16 days are automatically archived to User talk:Hamedog/Archive 2. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Note:If you post a message here, I will reply here. If I post a message on your talk page, don't reply here. I have your page in my watchlist. This keeps the conversation from breaking.

Archiving icon
Archives

Jellybeans

You have been awarded these Jelly Beans from -The Doctor- Please, enjoy them.

Here are some Jelly beans for you. I love jelly beans as they have sugar in them and most people love sugar. But on the other hand just receiving somthing from somone else just makes you happy and also just giving this to you makes me happy. I hope to spread the jelly beans all over Misplaced Pages, so here, you can have this lot. Please enjoy them. (I like the lime ones.)

Editors need a bit of a sugar high too.

An apple a day keeps -The Doctor- away. Or does it! 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

David Beckham

Chocolate

Hi, do you like whittakers chocolae?

2006 Tri Nations Series images

Hey, I was wondering if you could create two more of those starting line-up images for this article? I have added the starting line-ups, and replacements and everything to the article, and all that is needed are those images. Would be great if you could do this, thanks! - Shudda 00:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Okay, if I get time.--HamedogTalk| 06:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Wallabies

If I get time.--HamedogTalk| 22:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

2007 final

Hey, have started something here. - Shudda 03:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

RfA

Hey, thanks for the RfA nomination. I must decline however. I don't really have any need for the admin powers, and am quite happy contributing the way I am at the moment. I'm really flattered that you nominated me - so please don't be offended that I have declined. Thanks. - Shudda 01:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Hamdog Willkca has been warned that repeating the comments will result in a block please leave the issue alone, in short the comments were offensive statements about staff, student and parents of student at the school including names. Gnangarra 02:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I assume you deleted the edits? Yes, sorry about this I was curious as to what had happened, not trying to re-start the fire or anything. Was I mentioned?--HamedogTalk| 02:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
What was said was deleted, there is no need for further comments. If you have concerns raise it WP:AN/I. Gnangarra 03:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Wow, you make it sound like I have done something wrong.--HamedogTalk| 03:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:LIBEL is the official position of Misplaced Pages, please read it Gnangarra 03:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Also Slander_and_libel#Australian_law Gnangarra 03:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Come on- just stay off the issue or a more adventurous admin will block you on the spot, Stay out of the issue and dont leave anything on any page to do with the issue. Simple as that. SatuSuro 03:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I am aware of slander and libel but I don't think Australian Law applies in this situation as the offence technically occurs in Florida, coming under United States Law (as Misplaced Pages's servers are hosted there). On what grounds would I be blocked? As far as I am aware I have just made an inquirey into the events that occured on the talk page of an article I have made major contributions too (a mouthful!).--HamedogTalk| 03:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Having read Slander_and_libel#Australian_law, I take back some of the comments made earlier. But I have not made claims that could be regarded as libel (at least not recently :P)--HamedogTalk| 04:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
you asked about the willkca comments, They are why I have referred to those links, I have ask you to cease I'm now officially warning you that continuation of this is disruptive and are asking people to violate Australian law as that article link indicates. I am also requesting that you move this discussion to your current archive once you have read this message. Gnangarra 04:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)