| Revision as of 12:45, 31 May 2007 editFerocious Driver (talk | contribs)64 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:48, 31 May 2007 edit undoFerocious Driver (talk | contribs)64 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| This editor has full permission to remove, without replying, any comments he feels are likely to inflame dispute. If you have a problem with this editor, you are invited to bring that concern to the attention of the administrators noticeboard or a member of the arbitration community, but please bear in mind that we have a zero-tolerance approach to harassment. | This editor has full permission to remove, without replying, any comments he feels are likely to inflame dispute. If you have a problem with this editor, you are invited to bring that concern to the attention of the administrators noticeboard or a member of the arbitration community, but please bear in mind that we have a zero-tolerance approach to harassment. | ||
| ----Rodney Anoa'i got reverted | ----] got reverted | ||
| {{cquote|People who are fighting the good fight here are sometimes threatened<br> | {{cquote|People who are fighting the good fight here are sometimes threatened<br> | ||
Revision as of 12:48, 31 May 2007
This editor has full permission to remove, without replying, any comments he feels are likely to inflame dispute. If you have a problem with this editor, you are invited to bring that concern to the attention of the administrators noticeboard or a member of the arbitration community, but please bear in mind that we have a zero-tolerance approach to harassment.
Rodney Anoa'i got reverted
| “ | People who are fighting the good fight here are sometimes threatened with a trip to ArbCom. They need our support, though. — Jimmy Wales |
” |
Source: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-March/066949.html
| “ | I can NOT emphasize this enough.
There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of |
” |
Source: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046440.html
| “ | If we don't have enough information to write a decent biography we need either a redirect or a short note explaining how the person was |
” |
Enough of this bullshit
I am tired of explaining, ad nauseum, to a specific group of people why WP:BLP is important. If you disagree with explicit emails drafted by Jimmy Wales, please take it up with him on your own. Burntsauce 21:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Deletion nominations
Please use a descriptive edit summary when you nominate articles for deletion. It doesn't have to be lengthy or complicated; AfD or WP:PROD would do nicely. Bonus points would be awarded if you used asterisks to really highlight such important edits (a la ****** AfD ****** or ******* WP:PROD *******). Thank you. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 03:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes please. It really helps your fellow Wikipedians when you are a bit more descriptive as to what you do by using edit summaries. Edit summaries take you some time, but they save a lot more time to everybody else. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)