Revision as of 18:19, 10 May 2005 editConocimiento (talk | contribs)1,086 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:50, 10 May 2005 edit undoDavid Levy (talk | contribs)Administrators45,228 edits →Isn't the picture too big?Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Isn't the picture too big? == | == Isn't the picture too big? == | ||
I'm not too good with pictures on wikipedia. can someone make it a bit smaller? thanks. ] 18:19, 10 May 2005 (UTC) | I'm not too good with pictures on wikipedia. can someone make it a bit smaller? thanks. ] 18:19, 10 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
:I've reduced the dimensions of the article version to 236x244 (¼ the original size, but still much larger than the previous photograph). Clicking on this image leads to the full-size (472x488) version. — ] 18:50, 10 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
==Mbstone wrote...== | |||
I deleted a phrase that began, "It is rumoured..." one, because we can do better than rumours (or rumors); and also, this article is about Franken, not the Fox pundit who is rumoured to have been behind Fox's ill-fated lawsuit.] 00:46, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC) | I deleted a phrase that began, "It is rumoured..." one, because we can do better than rumours (or rumors); and also, this article is about Franken, not the Fox pundit who is rumoured to have been behind Fox's ill-fated lawsuit.] 00:46, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:50, 10 May 2005
Isn't the picture too big?
I'm not too good with pictures on wikipedia. can someone make it a bit smaller? thanks. Stancel 18:19, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- I've reduced the dimensions of the article version to 236x244 (¼ the original size, but still much larger than the previous photograph). Clicking on this image leads to the full-size (472x488) version. — Lifeisunfair 18:50, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
Mbstone wrote...
I deleted a phrase that began, "It is rumoured..." one, because we can do better than rumours (or rumors); and also, this article is about Franken, not the Fox pundit who is rumoured to have been behind Fox's ill-fated lawsuit.Mbstone 00:46, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Also, lots of people are described in Misplaced Pages as "funny" and/or "successful" and/or "famous." Maybe all three together is a little POV, but each of these terms is accurate as pertains to Franken, and perhaps the people who delete these characterizations are proving to everyone how absolutely humorless some fanatics of a certain right-wing-propaganda cable channel can sometimes be.Mbstone 00:50, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Recent edits
Please do not remove material; instead, we try to add in other material to make the article follow Misplaced Pages:NPOV. If you have a problem with the current content, please feel free to discuss it here. Best, ] 16:07, 2004 Aug 7 (UTC)
Thejackhmr this article needed some adjustment; it had some subjective lines that needed to be redacted in order to comply with Misplaced Pages:NPOV. Perhaps they could be reworded by the author and reinserted.
- I've tried a compromise version; see what you think. ] 16:22, 2004 Aug 7 (UTC)
- Thejackhmr Perfect... Just one setence removed; was oddly worded, quasi-subjective, unsubstantial and possibly redundant:
- In an appearance on Late Night with Conan O'Brien in 2004, Franken claimed that Fox was either claiming rights to the phrase "fair and balanced" itself, or to ironical usage of it.
- Looks fine to me, then. Best, ] 16:35, 2004 Aug 7 (UTC)
Hey
Can we use a picture that's not an advertisment for his CD?
No offense....
I put a much more awesome picture up instead of that stupid one.
- Do we have permission to use this new picture? Gamaliel 00:00, 10 May 2005 (UTC)