Revision as of 06:12, 7 June 2007 editUseight (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Administrators78,691 edits →Users to Watch← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:23, 7 June 2007 edit undoUseight (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Administrators78,691 edits →Users to WatchNext edit → | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
==Users to Watch== | ==Users to Watch== | ||
* |
*Jdubquestus --6/5/07-- | ||
* |
*DIALLOG PK --6/5/07-- | ||
* |
*Jonbonjonni --6/5/07-- | ||
*Tyminator --6/6/07-- | *Tyminator --6/6/07-- | ||
* |
*Tpcmarketing --6/6/07-- | ||
* |
*Manjukirans --6/7/07-- | ||
*Laser10101010101010101010 --6/7/07-- | |||
==Block== | ==Block== |
Revision as of 06:23, 7 June 2007
Tags For Deletion
- db-bio is for bio about person, group, etc
- subst:prod|reason is for other possible deletions
- db-nocontext is for no context
- db-spam is for blatant advertising
- db-inc is for a company with no importance
- db-nonsense is for pages about nothing
- db|any text
- db-attack is for slanderous remarks
- db-vandalism is for pure vandalism
- db-test is for a test pages
- db-nocontent is for blank pages
Other Tags
- ] to make a link different than its text
To use on talk pages of vandals:
Pages I've Made
- Operations Technical Support Services - baleeted
- List of People Known By One Name (Unambigiously) - delteeted
- List of Nonhuman, Animated Disney Characters - discussed, deleted
- Nike Air Pasco
Useful Links
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Wikipedia_counter-vandalism_tools
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Most_vandalized_pages
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Newpages
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Recent_changes_patrol
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Recentchanges
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Contested_candidates_for_speedy_deletion
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikify
Questions When Becoming Admin
- What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why?
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
Articles To Note
Users to Watch
- Jdubquestus --6/5/07--
- DIALLOG PK --6/5/07--
- Jonbonjonni --6/5/07--
- Tyminator --6/6/07--
- Tpcmarketing --6/6/07--
- Manjukirans --6/7/07--
- Laser10101010101010101010 --6/7/07--
Block
You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. Nunh-huh 18:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Useight, The vandalism in question was using an attack page for chatting, specifically is matt gay. If you still think there's been an error, please let me know. Nunh-huh 19:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC) I've removed it on the basis that I may have misread your intent. Feel free to delete this once you've read it.- Nunh-huh 19:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- It appears there's been a misunderstanding... per the deleted page log, the only activity User:Useight has had on the article was tagging it with a {{db-attack}} tag; the other two blocked users in the edit history of this page actually did use the page as an attack chat board as such. I'm going ahead and reversing the block on this basis. --Kinu /c 19:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Your unblock is hardly necessary, since I've already unblocked him. (see the text directly above yours). - Nunh-huh 19:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't see it in the log so I wasn't aware that you had. --Kinu /c 19:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- It doesn't hurt to be unblocked twice, I suppose. My apologies, btw, to Useight, for having misunderstood his contribution to that page. - Nunh-huh 19:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't see it in the log so I wasn't aware that you had. --Kinu /c 19:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Y |
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Request handled by: Nunh-huh 20:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC) |
Only a complete toad would try to use this against you, and I don't think you need to worry they will. If they do, I would certainly back you up. Glad to see the unautoblock went through. - Nunh-huh 20:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks! Good luck to you too! Oh and this block thing (above) I just noticed...that's just funny. Later. Cquan 07:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)