| Revision as of 18:26, 10 June 2007 editTigerShark (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators17,615 edits RE: Hi← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:29, 10 June 2007 edit undoTecmobowl (talk | contribs)3,160 edits →DisputeNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Dispute== | ==Dispute== | ||
| Hi. It seems that you and Epeefleche are currently engaged in a dispute. I am sure that you want to resolve this amicably, so can I please suggest that you review ] and have a go at following the process described. Leave me a note if I can be of further assistance, but hopefully you can sort it out yourselves. I have left exactly the same note for Epeefleche. Cheers ] 17:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | Hi. It seems that you and Epeefleche are currently engaged in a dispute. I am sure that you want to resolve this amicably, so can I please suggest that you review ] and have a go at following the process described. Leave me a note if I can be of further assistance, but hopefully you can sort it out yourselves. I have left exactly the same note for Epeefleche. Cheers ] 17:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :I've been talking to Epeeflechee via email about this whole situation. As for your accusations, read ]. It's for vandalism intervention, not dispute intervention. Also, the only reason why he's pursuing the matter is because you keep removing the link. Refrain from doing so for the time-being, and then discuss at the talk page. Like I told Epeeflechee, you are both guilty here, and if one of you guys keeps removing/adding the link, then there's going to be no end to this dispute. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">] (])</span> 18:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::In regards to your question at the DYK talk page, see . You can't see directly how it was on the Main Page, but you can see it at the transcluded template. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">] (])</span> 18:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::People provided their arguments for keeping/removing the link. The result was no consensus. That doesn't mean you should use that as an indication that people want the link to be removed, and continue removing the link from articles. Until there's a clear-cut consensus, being bold is not particularly helpful (and it's borderline reckless, which is what WP:BOLD tells you not to do). See ]. You were bold, people reverted you, and now you've opened up a discussion. By reverting again, you've simply gone back to where you started. I'll participate in the discussion later when I'm not so busy (I have a bunch of school projects due in the next few days). <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">] (])</span> 18:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==RE: Hi== | ==RE: Hi== | ||
Revision as of 18:29, 10 June 2007
Dispute
Hi. It seems that you and Epeefleche are currently engaged in a dispute. I am sure that you want to resolve this amicably, so can I please suggest that you review Misplaced Pages:Resolving disputes and have a go at following the process described. Leave me a note if I can be of further assistance, but hopefully you can sort it out yourselves. I have left exactly the same note for Epeefleche. Cheers TigerShark 17:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
RE: Hi
Thanks for the note. I m happy to help here, but I could really do with catching up on progress so far with the dispute resolution. I think that we should use the process described in WP:DR as a framework, so could you please look through that again and let me know what has/hasn't happened so far. Cheers TigerShark 18:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC)