Revision as of 00:08, 12 May 2005 editMeelar (talk | contribs)Administrators29,708 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:13, 15 May 2005 edit undoGrutness (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators316,529 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Hey, I've worked out a quick list of criteria for inclusion of political groups (not just PACs). Tell me what you think, and feel free to add comments there. Best, ] ] 00:08, May 12, 2005 (UTC) | :Hey, I've worked out a quick list of criteria for inclusion of political groups (not just PACs). Tell me what you think, and feel free to add comments there. Best, ] ] 00:08, May 12, 2005 (UTC) | ||
==Vfd vote for ]== | |||
Hi - thought you might want to take a look at the article now, and see whether you still feel the same about its vfd...? ]...<font color=green><small>''] 07:13, 15 May 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:13, 15 May 2005
Vfd
Hi there! You said, "Weak keep as in Doing Our Nation's Service PAC above. Perhaps we could come up with a way to merge these PACs into larger categories? ESkog 20:54, 11 May 2005 (UTC)"... excellent idea! Per Meta:Mergist and WP:BOLD, I would encourage everyone to merge stubby articles rather than putting them up for deletion. The best thing about it, is that if you think you're being helpful by merging, we will by default trust you. Radiant_* 22:23, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
I have attempted to start doing this at List of political action committees, and have announced it at the Village Pump in hopes that others will help me find these political stubs and send em here. ESkog 22:52, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
- Hey, I've worked out a quick list of criteria for inclusion of political groups (not just PACs). Tell me what you think, and feel free to add comments there. Best, Meelar (talk) 00:08, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
Vfd vote for 1968 in France
Hi - thought you might want to take a look at the article now, and see whether you still feel the same about its vfd...? Grutness...wha? 07:13, 15 May 2005 (UTC)