| Revision as of 10:55, 25 April 2007 edit65.185.15.204 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:44, 11 June 2007 edit undoMakeroftoys (talk | contribs)3 edits MIsleading aspects regarding PB 100 identifiedNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| (and later adopted and promoted by Apple, since it was 680X0-CPU friendly) | (and later adopted and promoted by Apple, since it was 680X0-CPU friendly) | ||
| ] 10:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)rhyre417 | ] 10:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)rhyre417 | ||
| The article leads the reader to think that 1) the Powerbook 100 came out first, and 2) that Sony was somehow responsible for the ergonomic innovation of the Powerbooks. Both are incorrect. The PB 100, 140, and 170 were all introduced on the same day (Oct 21, 1991) and the industrial design of the PB 100 was dictated by Apple. | |||
Revision as of 15:44, 11 June 2007
- Keep length under approx. 45k
- Improve Business culture section
- A bit of cleaning up. Might help shorten the article as well.
- Research Nubus claim - my recollection was that it was initially developed by MIT&TI for TI Explorers
(and later adopted and promoted by Apple, since it was 680X0-CPU friendly)
65.185.15.204 10:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)rhyre417
The article leads the reader to think that 1) the Powerbook 100 came out first, and 2) that Sony was somehow responsible for the ergonomic innovation of the Powerbooks. Both are incorrect. The PB 100, 140, and 170 were all introduced on the same day (Oct 21, 1991) and the industrial design of the PB 100 was dictated by Apple.