| Revision as of 16:11, 11 June 2007 editChaser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users22,935 edits blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:13, 11 June 2007 edit undoChaser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users22,935 editsm section off block msgNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 15:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC) | {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 15:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Blocked== | |||
| I have blocked this IP address for 24 hours for 3rr violation on ]. It is true that you weren't given a 3rr warning until after the last revert, but the edit war has been happening for longer than the past 24 hrs and you're comments on the article talk page have been counterproductive. Please work constructively with other editors and discuss changes on article talk pages. Otherwise you may find the article protected or yourself blocked again. Thank you.--] - ] 16:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC) | I have blocked this IP address for 24 hours for 3rr violation on ]. It is true that you weren't given a 3rr warning until after the last revert, but the edit war has been happening for longer than the past 24 hrs and you're comments on the article talk page have been counterproductive. Please work constructively with other editors and discuss changes on article talk pages. Otherwise you may find the article protected or yourself blocked again. Thank you.--] - ] 16:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 11 June 2007
TTC Special Constables
From the TTC's own website: "Uniformed and plainclothes TTC Special Constables are sworn by the Toronto Police Service." Sworn as what? To all intents and purposes they appear to me to be "police" in every common definition of the term. The site also states that they "have the same powers as a Police Officer to enforce the Criminal Code of Canada". Before you start telling me I have no expertise in the subject (being that I am a police officer myself), pray tell me what the difference is. It seems to be merely a peculiarity of terminology, not a real difference. Please also note that it is not sensible to link a whole sentence, as you have done on the Transit police page. -- Necrothesp 17:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Szvest 20:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- Szvest 20:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Warnings
 | Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history. |
May 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Mart Laar, you will be blocked from editing. -- -- intgr 00:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
June 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Lihula. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Digwuren 15:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Digwuren, my comments were factually absolutely correct. I understand your personal vendetta, but Lihila memorial honour Estonian members of Waffen SS. This is factual statement, even if you are uncomfortable with it personally. 206.186.8.130 18:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Mart Laar. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Misplaced Pages policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- intgr 19:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Mart Laar, you will be blocked from editing. Digwuren 06:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Monument of Lihula, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. DLX 05:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Judenfrei, you will be blocked from editing. Digwuren 14:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Monument of Lihula, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Digwuren 14:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Monument of Lihula. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Digwuren 15:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
I have blocked this IP address for 24 hours for 3rr violation on Monument of Lihula. It is true that you weren't given a 3rr warning until after the last revert, but the edit war has been happening for longer than the past 24 hrs and you're comments on the article talk page have been counterproductive. Please work constructively with other editors and discuss changes on article talk pages. Otherwise you may find the article protected or yourself blocked again. Thank you.--Chaser - T 16:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.