| Revision as of 04:08, 8 June 2007 editSlakr (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators33,695 edits →AIV: response← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:12, 12 June 2007 edit undoRklawton (talk | contribs)Administrators40,714 edits CSD on SKY UNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| Thanks for the notice put up on ] about a vandal. They have not as of yet been blocked, due to the fact that they seemed to have stopped editing for now. But keep up the good work, but remember to warn users, as they cannot simply be blocked usually. ]]] 04:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC) | Thanks for the notice put up on ] about a vandal. They have not as of yet been blocked, due to the fact that they seemed to have stopped editing for now. But keep up the good work, but remember to warn users, as they cannot simply be blocked usually. ]]] 04:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Excellent. Thanks for all your hard work. And yes, I always make it a point to warn users before bugging you guys except in cases of repeat offenders =) Cheers. --] 04:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC) | :Excellent. Thanks for all your hard work. And yes, I always make it a point to warn users before bugging you guys except in cases of repeat offenders =) Cheers. --] 04:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==CSD on SKY U== | |||
| Hi. No headaches. The place gets a lot of g-hits, so I thought a speedy might be a bit hastey. The first version was clearly written like spam, but I couldn't find any copyvios, so I just edited down to something vaguely encyclopedic. I'll keep an eye on the article. As far as the editor goes - he/she is just a novice (probably just a ] who needs polite guidance. Good work, and cheers, ] 20:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:12, 12 June 2007
- Thanks for editing my userpage back, no issues you didn't overwrite anything. Appreciated. Riksta 13:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- wikipedia pkk propanganda make.I m this not Pkk anti kurdish wikipedia millitanism noTURKS REVENGE BRİGADE--88.241.3.229 12:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, not exactly sure how to respond to that one. I do assure you, however, that none of my actions are anti-anything, so I'm sorry if any of my reverts came across as such. If you feel they were unjust, please speak with the Arbitration Committee. Thanks, and continue enjoying Misplaced Pages! :) --koder 14:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Reverting archive blanking
Eep, no, I've been out of town a few days. Thank you kindly for putting your oar in on reverting my archive page! RGTraynor 00:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Matthew Pruden Prod
I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Matthew Pruden, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. Thanks! NickelShoe (Talk) 20:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I was referring to . I suppose you could be right that it wasn't intended as an objection to the deletion, but on the safe side I wouldn't assume that. I noticed your "oops" edit but didn't take it as any particular interpretation of the other editor's intent. Anyway, sorry about any mixup. NickelShoe (Talk) 00:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
AIV
Thanks for the notice put up on WP:AIV about a vandal. They have not as of yet been blocked, due to the fact that they seemed to have stopped editing for now. But keep up the good work, but remember to warn users, as they cannot simply be blocked usually. Jmlk17 04:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent. Thanks for all your hard work. And yes, I always make it a point to warn users before bugging you guys except in cases of repeat offenders =) Cheers. --koder 04:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
CSD on SKY U
Hi. No headaches. The place gets a lot of g-hits, so I thought a speedy might be a bit hastey. The first version was clearly written like spam, but I couldn't find any copyvios, so I just edited down to something vaguely encyclopedic. I'll keep an eye on the article. As far as the editor goes - he/she is just a novice (probably just a WP:SPA who needs polite guidance. Good work, and cheers, Rklawton 20:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)