Misplaced Pages

• If I post on your talk page, I will notice any replies posted there.
• Unless you request otherwise, I will reply here to comments made here.
• I will usually post a brief note on your talk page to let you know that I have replied, unless your talk page instructs me otherwise.
• If you write a reply to me here, I may decide to move your text back to your talk page in an effort to keep the thread in one place.
• If you are just pointing out something written to me elsewhere, edit here.
• Such pointers are useful if you've written to a comment I made many days ago.
• Be civil and assume good faith. Trolling and personal attacks are likely to be removed.
• My user talk page is archived automatically by Werdnabot, so
• To see older messages please view my archives.

Messages

Archives: The Basement  · My desk  · My Barnstars

Hello

Hi. How did you do in the exams? --Bhadani (talk) 13:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Passed all of them. Got B+ in two. :) — Nearly Headless Nick 13:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

It is fine that you passed all of them and Got B+ in two papers. What about others? --Bhadani (talk) 13:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

C+ in Managerial Accountancy, C in Contract Act - I (barely passed, *phew*). — Nearly Headless Nick 13:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Though I congratulate you on your passing the exams, I would suggest you to concentrate more on your studies. What are your papers in the next term? Perhaps, i shall be able to give some suggestions - after all, decades before Bhadani was also a student :) --Bhadani (talk) 13:37, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

B+ is considered super awesome at my college. Anything above 50 is god's domain. :) — Nearly Headless Nick 13:39, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Is it so? Ok. Fine. What are the papers in the next term? I am a bit curious. --Bhadani (talk) 13:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Continuous evalutation every week + Mid semesters (in two months) + Finals (in four months) + project and paper submissions. — Nearly Headless Nick 13:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Archimedes

Hi, thanks for closing the discussion and deleting the article and talk page, but what about Talk:Archimedes Plutonium/Archive 1? Shouldn't that be part of the deletion as well, especially given the reasons for deletion that most people voiced in the discussion? Thanks. ElinorD (talk) 13:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Terminated. — Nearly Headless Nick 13:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. ElinorD (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

DYK

Do You Know? I am enjoying myself at Autism and Diabetes. The place is free of stress and one can silently work - life in small wikis are different than the stress of wikipedia. --Bhadani (talk) 13:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I somehow enjoy the challenge this place provides me. — Nearly Headless Nick 13:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Everyone has a definition of enjoyment. After all, happiness is a state of mind. --Bhadani (talk) 13:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

BTW, I have not left wikipedia completely. I will come back whenever I feel so. --Bhadani (talk) 13:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, we should take a break when we feel stressed and not continue "Macbeth-style" (in the words of morven). Remember, no one leaves Misplaced Pages (words of freakofnurture). — Nearly Headless Nick 14:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Flood geology

It may be just a misunderstanding, but my revert is explained on Talk:Flood geology. I hope that satisfies your concerns. If not, let me know. --ScienceApologist 14:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

A. Pu deletion vote #3

Re: your closing debate and deleting on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Archimedes Plutonium (third nomination). Note: I voted to keep, but am quite content to see deletion if that is the consensus. However, I count 15 votes to keep, 11 votes to delete, and 4 votes to merge or redirect. That didn't look like a consensus for deletion to me. Am I missing something? Puzzled, -- Infrogmation 14:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

That is because you are counting votes. — Nearly Headless Nick 14:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. However I fear I remain unilluminated by it. Is there anything related to this which I might find informative which you'd care to share? Cheers, -- Infrogmation 15:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

AfDs are not supposed to be !votes. We are consensus driven, and not a democracy. Consensus can exist only within the purview of policy. Everything, including my rationale of closure, based on weighing the discussions of both side, is available on the AfD page. Best, — Nearly Headless Nick 15:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Archimedes Plutonium

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Archimedes Plutonium. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Barberio 16:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Abuse of CSD A7

I object strenuously to the speedy deletion of Karen Leigh King under a category of Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content. Since when is a Harvard professor an unremarkable person? Did you actually examine the linkst to the page before deleting it? Charles Matthews 16:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I apologise for the inconvenience caused. — Nearly Headless Nick 06:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Sir_Nicholas

With great thanks for deleting the page that was created about me, and on which people created controversy on to attack me. I was impressed that the wiki community stepped in to make things right with a user with an agenda to spray slanderous paint. Also note that the user who sparked this Rwilco201 continues to post the original article on his user page - to rebel against the wiki editors who told him to delete it, and to continue with his/her initial objective of promoting a non-accepted slanderous article from a tabloid - do users ever get deleted? He/she really concerns me, based on the history of the posts, and his subtle, but clever ways to continue pushing his/her agenda. Should I delete anything on my user page? Should we delete my user account? I would be ok with that, as well. Please advise. Mitchthrower 17:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC) -Mitch Thrower

I have deleted the GFDL violation on Rwilco201's page as well. — Nearly Headless Nick 05:59, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mukesh Ambani.jpg

Andy, I noticed you added a fair-use rationale to the above image. I have added {{Replaceable fair use}} tag to the above image. If you dispute the tag, please feel free to discuss it on the image talk page. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 20:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I have deleted the image. Thanks. — Nearly Headless Nick 05:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Australian Catholics magazine entry deleted

Dear si nick, you deleted the Australian Catholics magazine entry with what authority? The entry is regardnig a magazine that has a CAB-audited national circulation of 200,000 in australia. It is a not insignificant magazine. Furthermore, the entry was written by the editor himself, so the entries are VERIFIABLE. I will thank you for not deleting it again.

Mr Wikiboxgmail man

Spam if I ever saw it.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Hmm—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

First of all, it wasn't A7. It was G11. And secondly, I don't appreciate the userfying of the spam article. If he does not edit outside of that page, I will reblock him.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi there! :)

Dear, I see you blocked User:Spoolintsi for 24 hours due to sockpuppetry, but after you blocked, I added further information to his CU case. In the last hours, he created yet another sock and also posted under his IP, making at least 7 different trolling edits to WP:RFPP and vandalized Karrmann's userpage. Just letting you know about the aggravating circumstances present in this case, which combined with his previous use of socks might make the 24 hours a little too soft in this case. What do you think? love, Phaedriel - 10:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)