Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sanity: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:35, 12 December 2001 editChenyu (talk | contribs)166 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:43, 25 February 2002 edit undoConversion script (talk | contribs)10 editsm Automated conversionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
I've deleted the exchange formerly on this page, which had become less than helpful to anyone writing an article on ]. In the future I'll try to keep my remarks polite and helpful. -- ] I've deleted the exchange formerly on this page, which had become less than helpful to anyone writing an article on ]. In the future I'll try to keep my remarks polite and helpful. -- ]
---- ----
If anyone can help me find an encyclopedia article, even an old one, published anywhere, entitled "sanity," I would appreciate referral to same. If anyone can help me find an encyclopedia article, even an old one, published anywhere, entitled "sanity," I would appreciate referral to same.
Line 5: Line 5:
I've changed the wording and moved the link to I've changed the wording and moved the link to


* ] * ]


here since it didn't seem to be useful. Personally I wish that this was a topic here since it didn't seem to be useful. Personally I wish that this was a topic
Line 12: Line 12:
------- -------


What was wrong with my 'generally defined negatively by absence of insanity' - this seems to me to be one of the few things that most agree on, even if they can't agree on what sanity actually '''is'''. -- ] What was wrong with my 'generally defined negatively by absence of insanity' - this seems to me to be one of the few things that most agree on, even if they can't agree on what sanity actually '''is'''. -- ]
------ ------
The problem wasn't that sanity is the lack of insanity (which I've added). The problem The problem wasn't that sanity is the lack of insanity (which I've added). The problem

Revision as of 15:43, 25 February 2002

I've deleted the exchange formerly on this page, which had become less than helpful to anyone writing an article on sanity. In the future I'll try to keep my remarks polite and helpful. -- Larry Sanger


If anyone can help me find an encyclopedia article, even an old one, published anywhere, entitled "sanity," I would appreciate referral to same.


I've changed the wording and moved the link to

here since it didn't seem to be useful. Personally I wish that this was a topic that I knew nothing about, but tragically this is not the case.


What was wrong with my 'generally defined negatively by absence of insanity' - this seems to me to be one of the few things that most agree on, even if they can't agree on what sanity actually is. -- The Anome


The problem wasn't that sanity is the lack of insanity (which I've added). The problem was that the link incorrectly implied that sanity was synonymous with mental illness, which it is not. Sanity is not a medical term. It is a legal term. You can have extreme mental illness and still be considered quite sane.