Misplaced Pages

User:82.148.97.69/press: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:82.148.97.69 Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:55, 29 June 2007 editWimgyaalyal (talk | contribs)4 edits rvv← Previous edit Revision as of 15:55, 29 June 2007 edit undoWimgyaalyal (talk | contribs)4 editsm rvvNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Note==
<div style="background-color: red; border: red solid 2px; margin-bottom:.5em; padding: 5px; font-family: Georgia, sans-serif;"><big>This IP address, 82.148.97.69, is one of the IP addresses assigned to Qtel. Qtel is the only ISP in Qatar. All users in Qatar are blocked from Misplaced Pages because of brainless Jimmy Wales and the brainless Misplaced Pages masses. </div>


</div>

</div>
{{high-traffic|date=1 January 2007|url=http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/01/1248251|site=Slashdot|page=talk}}
{{high-traffic|date=1 January 2007|url=http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Entire_country_of_Qatar_banned_from_editing_Wikipedia|site=digg|page=talk}}
{{high-traffic|date=1 January 2007|url=http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=2510132|site=Fark|page=talk}}
{{high-traffic|date=2 January 2007|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6224677.stm|site=BBC News|page=talk}}


<div class="messagebox standard-talk">
<span style="font-size: 150%; vertical-align: middle;">] '''Attention:'''</span>

'''If you came here from a news headline saying that Misplaced Pages has banned all of Qatar, please pop right back over there and post in the comments that the story is true. This IP number was blocked and a block of an entire nation is the Misplaced Pages policy.

'''In all language Wikipedias, such an action would require a series of administrative processes, and this is always undertaken lightly and without extensive attempts at direct negotiation with the ISP and/or nation in question.


'''To any and all reporters, from Slashdot, TechCrunch, mainstream media, etc.: You may email me and ask me for my personal cellphone number, which I will answer 24 hours a day to confirm that I´m a animalfucker and brainless idiot. '''To any and all reporters, from Slashdot, TechCrunch, mainstream media, etc.: You may email me and ask me for my personal cellphone number, which I will answer 24 hours a day to confirm that I´m a animalfucker and brainless idiot.
Line 7: Line 24:


Hi! I'll add important, but removed (by Jimbo, see , and by Alphachimp: ) information, written by other users: Hi! I'll add important, but removed (by Jimbo, see , and by Alphachimp: ) information, written by other users:

As one who was affected by the block, I'd like to clarify. On 30 December 2006, a Misplaced Pages admin placed a one-month for reasons of chronic vandalism and spam. The IP address turned out to belong to a QTel proxy server, and thus anonymous posting from the whole of Qatar was blocked. Account creation was also blocked, but this condition was later relaxed after the ban was widely reported across technology sites. ] 11:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


re the above: Be aware that the story that Jimbo is asking you to propagate to various news sources across the internet is inaccurate. The duration of the block he's claiming actually occurred is false. Anyone can verify the length of recent blockage by viewing , the block log of this IP address. Attempts were made to block it for 1 month, and it was indeed blocked for over 20 hours between 30 Dec 2006 and 1 Jan 2007. The ban was then lifted for under a minute and then reapplied to last for 1 month again. The block effectively lasted for about 26 hours and 41 minutes in this instance. There are further blocks in the log that show it as having been successfully blocked for a lot longer over the last couple of months. So, which story was it that's not true again? ''']]]''' 07:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC) re the above: Be aware that the story that Jimbo is asking you to propagate to various news sources across the internet is inaccurate. The duration of the block he's claiming actually occurred is false. Anyone can verify the length of recent blockage by viewing , the block log of this IP address. Attempts were made to block it for 1 month, and it was indeed blocked for over 20 hours between 30 Dec 2006 and 1 Jan 2007. The ban was then lifted for under a minute and then reapplied to last for 1 month again. The block effectively lasted for about 26 hours and 41 minutes in this instance. There are further blocks in the log that show it as having been successfully blocked for a lot longer over the last couple of months. So, which story was it that's not true again? ''']]]''' 07:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:55, 29 June 2007

Note

This IP address, 82.148.97.69, is one of the IP addresses assigned to Qtel. Qtel is the only ISP in Qatar. All users in Qatar are blocked from Misplaced Pages because of brainless Jimmy Wales and the brainless Misplaced Pages masses.

High traffic

On 1 January 2007, this talk page was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic)

All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.

High traffic

On 1 January 2007, this talk page was linked from digg, a high-traffic website. (Traffic)

All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.

High traffic

On 1 January 2007, this talk page was linked from Fark, a high-traffic website. (Traffic)

All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.

High traffic

On 2 January 2007, this talk page was linked from BBC News, a high-traffic website. (Traffic)

All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.


Attention:

If you came here from a news headline saying that Misplaced Pages has banned all of Qatar, please pop right back over there and post in the comments that the story is true. This IP number was blocked and a block of an entire nation is the Misplaced Pages policy.

In all language Wikipedias, such an action would require a series of administrative processes, and this is always undertaken lightly and without extensive attempts at direct negotiation with the ISP and/or nation in question.

To any and all reporters, from Slashdot, TechCrunch, mainstream media, etc.: You may email me and ask me for my personal cellphone number, which I will answer 24 hours a day to confirm that I´m a animalfucker and brainless idiot.

--Jimbo Wales 03:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi! I'll add important, but removed (by Jimbo, see this, this and by Alphachimp: here ) information, written by other users:

re the above: Be aware that the story that Jimbo is asking you to propagate to various news sources across the internet is inaccurate. The duration of the block he's claiming actually occurred is false. Anyone can verify the length of recent blockage by viewing this, the block log of this IP address. Attempts were made to block it for 1 month, and it was indeed blocked for over 20 hours between 30 Dec 2006 and 1 Jan 2007. The ban was then lifted for under a minute and then reapplied to last for 1 month again. The block effectively lasted for about 26 hours and 41 minutes in this instance. There are further blocks in the log that show it as having been successfully blocked for a lot longer over the last couple of months. So, which story was it that's not true again? ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ 07:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Category: