Revision as of 13:01, 3 July 2007 edit59.149.87.17 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:53, 4 July 2007 edit undoEep² (talk | contribs)7,014 editsm linksNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{otheruses4|the safety device|the band|The Seatbelts}} | {{otheruses4|the safety device|the band|The Seatbelts}} | ||
] | ] | ||
A '''seat belt''', sometimes called a '''safety belt''', is a harness designed to secure the occupant of a |
A '''seat belt''', sometimes called a '''safety belt''', is a ] designed to secure the occupant of a ] against harmful movement that may result from a ] or a sudden stop. As part of an overall occupant ], seat belts are intended to reduce ] by stopping the wearer from hitting hard interior elements of the vehicle or other passengers and by preventing the wearer from being thrown from the vehicle. | ||
== Types of seat belts == | == Types of seat belts == |
Revision as of 05:53, 4 July 2007
This article is about the safety device. For the band, see The Seatbelts.A seat belt, sometimes called a safety belt, is a safety harness designed to secure the occupant of a vehicle against harmful movement that may result from a collision or a sudden stop. As part of an overall occupant restraint system, seat belts are intended to reduce injuries by stopping the wearer from hitting hard interior elements of the vehicle or other passengers and by preventing the wearer from being thrown from the vehicle.
Types of seat belts
- Lap: Adjustable strap that goes over the waist. Used frequently in older cars, now uncommon except in some rear middle seats. Passenger aircraft seats also use lap seat belts.
- Two-point: A restraint system with two attachment points. A lap belt or (less commonly) diagonal belt (rare, common prior to the 1990s).
- Automatic: Any seat belt that closes itself automatically. There is also a lap belt which should be fastened.
- Sash: Adjustable strap that goes over the shoulder. Used mainly in the 1960s, but of limited benefit because it is very easy to slip out of in a collision.
- Lap and Sash: Combination of the two above (two separate belts). Mainly used in the 1960s and 1970s. Generally superseded by three-point design.
- Three point: Similar to the lap and sash, but one single continuous length of webbing. Both three-point and lap-and-sash belts help spread out the energy of the moving body in a collision over the chest, pelvis, and shoulders. Until the 1980s three-point belts were commonly available only in the front seats of cars, the back seats having only lap belts. Evidence of the potential for lap belts to cause separation of the lumbar vertebrae and the sometimes associated paralysis, or "seat belt syndrome", has led to a revision of safety regulations in nearly all of the developed world requiring that all seats in a vehicle be equipped with three-point belts. By September 1, 2007, all new cars sold in the US will require a lap and shoulder belt in the center rear.
- Criss Cross: Experimental safety belt presented in the Volvo SCC. It forms a cross-brace across the chest .
- Five-point harnesses are safer but more restrictive seat belts. They are typically found in child safety seats and in racing cars. The lap portion is connected to a belt between the legs and there are two shoulder belts, making a total of five points of attachment to the seat. (Strictly speaking, harnesses are never to be fastened to the seat - they should be fastened to the frame/sub-frame of the automobile.)
- Six-point harnesses are like a five-point harness but includes an extra belt between the legs, which is seen by some to be a weaker point than the other parts. These belts are used mainly in racing. In NASCAR, the six-point harness became popular after the death of Dale Earnhardt. Earnhardt was wearing a five-point harness when he crashed and died. Because it was thought at first that his belt had broken, some teams ordered a six-point harness.
- Inertia reel: Used almost universally today, inertia reel belts are effectively self-adjusting, which improves effectiveness. They also retract when not in use, reducing the chances of damage to the belts. A retractor reel lets out the strap or pulls it back as needed, and in the event of an accident the reel locks, preventing any more strap to come out and holding the passenger in the car. This may be augmented by pretensioners (see below). Most three-point belts are of inertia-reel construction, as are some lap-and-sash and lap belts.
History
Seat belts were invented by George Cayley in the 1800s. They were introduced in aircraft for the first time in 1913, by Adolphe Pegoud, who became the first man to fly a plane upside-down. However, seat belts did not become common on aircraft until the 1930s.
Safety belts were tested by Col John P. Stapp, using a rocket sled and himself as the guinea pig, among others. His studies explained the phenomenon that most people injured or killed in plane crashes didn't die when the plane hit the ground, but when the person hit the inside of the plane.
Edward J. Claghorn was granted U.S. patent 312,085 on February 10, 1885 for a safety belt providing protection for a person ascending or descending a ladder or pole.
Edward J. Hock invented the safety belt first used by the Ford Motor Company as standard equipment, while he was on active duty with the military as a flight instructor. In 1955 his idea was accepted by the naval authorities, and Hock was awarded $20.50 for his invention. The original schematic and blueprints shows that he utilized scrap parachute strapping to implement his idea. He was never awarded anything other than the $20.50 award, a letter of recognition, a picture with military 'brass', and a newspaper article to his credit.
Nils Bohlin of Sweden invented the three point seat belt for Volvo, who introduced it in 1959 as standard equipment. Bohlin was granted U.S. patent 3,043,625 for the device.
Most US automobiles were sold with front seat belts standard in the 1964 model year. Rear seat belts were made standard in 1968.
Mechanism
Most seat belts are equipped with locking mechanisms that tighten the belt when pulled hard (e.g. by the force of a passenger's body during a crash) but do not tighten when pulled slowly. This is implemented with a centrifugal clutch, which engages as the reel spins quickly. Alternatively, they may also be secured by a weighted pendulum or ball bearing: when these are deflected by deceleration or roll-over they lock into pawls on the reel.
Types of inertia reel type seatbelts:
NLR (No Locking Retractor) - Generally applies to a recoiling lapbelt
ELR V (Emergency Locking Retractor - Vehicle sensitive) - Single sensitive, is comprised of a locking mechanism activated in an emergency by deceleration or rollover of the vehicle (ie the seatbelt is vehicle sensitive).
ELR VW (Emergency Locking Retractor - Vehicle and Webbing sensitive) - Dual sensitive means a seatbelt retractor that, during normal driving conditions, allows freedom of movement by the wearer of the seatbelt by means of length- adjusting components that automatically adjust the strap to the wearer, and that is activated by two or more of the following: a)deceleration or rollover of the vehicle,(V)or b)acceleration of the strap from the retractor,(W)or c)other means of activation.
Pretensioners and webclamps
Seatbelts in many newer vehicles are also equipped with 'pretensioners' and/or 'Webclamps'.
- Pretensioners preemptively tighten the belt to prevent the occupant from jerking forward in a crash. Mercedes-Benz first introduced pretensioners on the 1981 S-Class. In the event of a crash, a pretensioner will tighten the belt almost instantaneously. This reduces the load on the occupant in a violent crash. Like airbags, pretensioners are triggered by sensors in the car's body, and most pretensioners use explosively expanding gas to drive a piston that retracts the belt. Pretensioners also lower the risk of "submarining", which is when a passenger slides forward under a loosely worn seat belt.
- Webclamps clamp the webbing in the event of an accident and limit the distance the webbing can spool out (caused by the unused webbing tightening on the central drum of the mechanism) these belts also often incorporate "rip stitching" which is when the lower part of the webbing is looped and stitched with a special stitching. The function of this is to 'rip' at a predetermined pressure rather than risk internal injuries to the occupants.
There is some research and tort liability case findings which suggest that some seatbelts are subject to inertial release. Although the NHTSA has been urged to deal with this defect it has yet not been properly addressed. "In 1992, the Institute for Injury Reduction (IIR) petitioned NHTSA to investigate such defects, but after several months, NHTSA denied the petition. Its own laboratory results indicated that inertial forces could cause a buckle to open, but that it didn’t happen in real world accidents." Source: Seat Belt Defects
Reminder chime and light
In North America and some other parts of the world, cars sold since the early 1970s have included a seat belt light on the dashboard, reminding the driver and passengers to buckle up. These systems also included a warning buzzer which sounded for several seconds before turning off (with the warning light), regardless of whether the car was started. New cars sold in the United States in 1974 and the first part of the 1975 model year were sold with a special "ignition interlock," whereby the driver could not start the car until the seat belt was fastened; however, this system was short-lived.
By the early 1980s, many car makers selling in the US market had replaced the buzzer (along with all other buzzers for functions such as headlights-on) with a seatbelt warning chime, though for some models, this change was not implemented until the 1990s or even the early 2000s. Today, many of these carmakers use a red figure with its seatbelt on to serve as its seatbelt warning light, and it may stay on for several minutes after the car is started and the driver's seat belt is not fastened.
In Europe most modern cars include a seat-belt reminder light for the driver and some also include a reminder for the passenger, when present, activated by a pressure sensor under the passenger seat. In some systems (i.e. older Volvos), the seatbelt is connected to the turn signal relay, making clicking sounds constantly until the front passengers are buckled up.
Some newer cars from Ford, Honda, Hyundai, and Toyota will intermittently flash the reminder light and sound the chime until the driver (and sometimes the front passenger, if present) fasten their seatbelt.
Legislation
Observational studies of car crash morbidity and mortality, experiments using both crash test dummies and human cadavers indicate that wearing seat belts provide a reduced risk of death and injury in the majority of car crashes.
This has led many countries to adopt mandatory seat belt wearing laws. It is generally accepted that, in comparing like-for-like accidents, a vehicle occupant wearing a properly fitted seat belt has a significantly lower chance of death and serious injury. One large observation studying using, US data, showed that the odds ratio of crash death is 0.46 with a three-point belt, when compared with no belt. In another study, that examined injuries presenting to the ER pre- and post-selt belt law introduction, it was found that 40% more escaped injury and 35% more escaped mild and moderate injuries.
The effects of seat belt laws are disputed by some, stemming from observations that road fatalities due to passage of a seat belt law, often, did not decrease.
Risk compensation
Some have proposed that the number of deaths was influenced by the development of risk compensation, which says that drivers adjust their behaviour in response to the increased sense of personal safety wearing a seat belt provides.
In one trial subjects were asked to drive go-karts around a track under various conditions. It was found that subjects who started driving unbelted drove consistently faster when subsequently belted. Similarly, a study of habitual non-seatbelt wearers driving in freeway conditions found evidence that they had adapted to seatbelt use by adopting higher driving speeds and closer following distances (similar responses have been shown in respect of anti-lock braking system and, more recently, airbags).
A 2001 study by Harvard economists Alma Cohen and Liran Einav examined the effect of mandatory seatbelt legislation on driving fatalities, and found that seatbelts decreased fatalities by 1.35% for each 10% increase in seatbelt use. Importantly, the study controlled for endogenous motivations of seat belt use, which can create an artificial correlation between seat belt use and fatalities, creating the false appearance that seatbelts cause fatalities. For example, drivers in high risk areas are more likely to use seat belts, and are more likely to be in accidents, creating a non-causal correlation between seatbelt use and mortality. After accounting for the endogeneity of seatbelt usage, Cohen and Einav found no evidence that the risk compensation effect makes seatbelt wearing drivers more dangerous.
Increased traffic
In studies that adjusted appropriately for increased traffic, and other factors such as age, a reduction of morbidity and mortality due to seat belt use has been demonstrated.
References
- ^ Nakahara S, Ichikawa M, Wakai S (2003). "Seatbelt legislation in Japan: high risk driver mortality and seatbelt use". Inj. Prev. 9 (1): 29–32. PMID 12642555.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Allen S, Zhu S, Sauter C, Layde P, Hargarten S (2006). "A comprehensive statewide analysis of seatbelt non-use with injury and hospital admissions: new data, old problem". Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 13 (4): 427–34. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2005.11.003. PMID 16531597.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Bourbeau R, Desjardins D, Maag U, Laberge-Nadeau C (1993). "Neck injuries among belted and unbelted occupants of the front seat of cars". The Journal of trauma. 35 (5): 794–9. PMID 8230348.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Bédard M, Guyatt GH, Stones MJ, Hirdes JP (2002). "The independent contribution of driver, crash, and vehicle characteristics to driver fatalities". Accident; analysis and prevention. 34 (6): 717–27. PMID 12371777.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Thomas J (1990). "Road traffic accidents before and after seatbelt legislation--study in a district general hospital". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 83 (2): 79–81. PMID 2319551.
- Streff FM, Geller ES (1988). "An experimental test of risk compensation: between-subject versus within-subject analyses". Accident; analysis and prevention. 20 (4): 277–87. PMID 3415759.
- Janssen W (1994). "Seat-belt wearing and driving behavior: an instrumented-vehicle study". Accident; analysis and prevention. 26 (2): 249–61. PMID 8198694.
- Template:PDFlink