| Revision as of 19:36, 4 July 2007 editFeddhicks (talk | contribs)200 edits RFCU to prove my innocence | Revision as of 15:06, 5 July 2007 edit undoLuk (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators44,791 edits case delistedNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| === ] === | === ] === | ||
| {{checkuser requests to be listed}} | |||
| {{rfcu box|case=Feddhicks|filed=19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)}} | {{rfcu box|case=Feddhicks|filed=19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)}} | ||
| * {{checkuser|Feddhicks}} | * {{checkuser|Feddhicks}} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
| Because Bobblehead doesn't agree with me, he accused me of being a sock. Maybe he is a sock of that person (there's a name for that but I forgot it...scarecrow sock, strawhat sock, etc???) ] 19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | Because Bobblehead doesn't agree with me, he accused me of being a sock. Maybe he is a sock of that person (there's a name for that but I forgot it...scarecrow sock, strawhat sock, etc???) ] 19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :{{delisted}} enwp checkuser policy states that we can't use checkuser to prove one's innocence. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 15:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:06, 5 July 2007
Feddhicks
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC) |
- Feddhicks (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bobblehead (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dereks1x (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: Prove my innocence
This checkuser is to prove my innocence. Bobblehead accused me of being a sock of this Derek guy ] because I thought that a controversial real estate dealing about Barack Obama should be a one sentence, neutral comment in the article instead of putting it in very small fine print hidden in the footnotes. (Some others wanted a full blown description as shown in archive 8).
Because Bobblehead doesn't agree with me, he accused me of being a sock. Maybe he is a sock of that person (there's a name for that but I forgot it...scarecrow sock, strawhat sock, etc???) Feddhicks 19:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Delisted enwp checkuser policy states that we can't use checkuser to prove one's innocence. -- lucasbfr 15:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
