Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ashtree Primary School: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:14, 26 May 2005 editVisviva (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators35,902 edits →[]: keep.← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:01, 26 May 2005 edit undoDuncharris (talk \| contribs)30,510 edits →[]: oh for fucks sake,Next edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	A non-notable primary school. ]\|] 14:29, 26 May 2005 (UTC)		A non-notable primary school. ]\|] 14:29, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
	* '''Keep'''. As a failing primary school, it was put on special measures in the 1990s but was mentioned in the 1999-2000 OFSTED annual report as one of only five Hertfordshire primary schools to have undergone a "very substantial improvement" in the previous year, resulting the lifting of the special measures order. --]\|] 14:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)		* '''Keep'''. As a failing primary school, it was put on special measures in the 1990s but was mentioned in the 1999-2000 OFSTED annual report as one of only five Hertfordshire primary schools to have undergone a "very substantial improvement" in the previous year, resulting the lifting of the special measures order. --]\|] 14:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
			** Great, then let's have an article on the other five too. And the ones that get mentioned in the 2001 report, the 2002 report, the 2003 report... the 2004 report, the 2005 report, and those not just for Herts, but Cambs and Oxon and Bucks and so on and mention '''nothing of interest at all''' about any of them. ]\|] 16:01, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
	* '''Keep'''. Haven't we had this discussion already? -- ] 15:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)		* '''Keep'''. Haven't we had this discussion already? -- ] 15:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:01, 26 May 2005

Ashtree Primary School

A non-notable primary school. Dunc|☺ 14:29, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Keep. As a failing primary school, it was put on special measures in the 1990s but was mentioned in the 1999-2000 OFSTED annual report as one of only five Hertfordshire primary schools to have undergone a "very substantial improvement" in the previous year, resulting the lifting of the special measures order. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Great, then let's have an article on the other five too. And the ones that get mentioned in the 2001 report, the 2002 report, the 2003 report... the 2004 report, the 2005 report, and those not just for Herts, but Cambs and Oxon and Bucks and so on and mention nothing of interest at all about any of them. Dunc|☺ 16:01, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Haven't we had this discussion already? -- Visviva 15:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:14, 26 May 2005 editVisviva (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators35,902 edits →[]: keep.← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:01, 26 May 2005 edit undoDuncharris (talk \| contribs)30,510 edits →[]: oh for fucks sake,Next edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	A non-notable primary school. ]\|] 14:29, 26 May 2005 (UTC)		A non-notable primary school. ]\|] 14:29, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
	* '''Keep'''. As a failing primary school, it was put on special measures in the 1990s but was mentioned in the 1999-2000 OFSTED annual report as one of only five Hertfordshire primary schools to have undergone a "very substantial improvement" in the previous year, resulting the lifting of the special measures order. --]\|] 14:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)		* '''Keep'''. As a failing primary school, it was put on special measures in the 1990s but was mentioned in the 1999-2000 OFSTED annual report as one of only five Hertfordshire primary schools to have undergone a "very substantial improvement" in the previous year, resulting the lifting of the special measures order. --]\|] 14:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
			** Great, then let's have an article on the other five too. And the ones that get mentioned in the 2001 report, the 2002 report, the 2003 report... the 2004 report, the 2005 report, and those not just for Herts, but Cambs and Oxon and Bucks and so on and mention '''nothing of interest at all''' about any of them. ]\|] 16:01, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
	* '''Keep'''. Haven't we had this discussion already? -- ] 15:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)		* '''Keep'''. Haven't we had this discussion already? -- ] 15:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)