| Revision as of 20:54, 17 April 2005 editPomegranate (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users606 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:00, 17 April 2005 edit undoPomegranate (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users606 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| I think it's more appropriate to describe the film as being set in 'Great Britain', as the situation would have been the same across the whole of the island. Changed. ] 20:48, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) | I think it's more appropriate to describe the film as being set in 'Great Britain', as the situation would have been the same across the whole of the island. Changed. ] 20:48, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ##Eh, that's me above. ] 20:54, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC) | ##Eh, that's me above. ] 20:54, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| By the way, there is no such thing as the England island. Please check up on your geography. This is what drove me to make the above changes. Referring to Great Britian (the island) or the United Kingdom, as 'England', is very irritating, especially to Scottish and Welsh people. ] 21:00, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:00, 17 April 2005
And then what happens? Is there supposed to be more after the text cuts off? - Puffy jacket 18:52, 7 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- Watch the film! That is supposed to be more, it's just not finished yet. Add a note explaining that if you think it's warranted! --Sam
This is ridiculous. I bet this plot synopsis is longer than the treatment. One short paragraph is enough for just about any film. Can someone trim this? -R. fiend 03:06, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Why? Yes it's longer than most other movie articles, but why does that bother you? It is very well-written and I find that its length detracts nothing from the article and in fact adds to it. I think its fine the length it is. -CunningLinguist 10:52, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with long articles - Omegatron 18:40, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
The window of opportunuity for filming just after dawn was small? It was reported that the normal activity had been removed by computers.
- Perhaps some was (though I'd not heard that) but it was definately filmed after dawn and before London got massively busy. violet/riga (t) 16:32, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Criticism/Public Reaction
Why is there no section on criticism or public reaction?
- I presume because nobody has felt fit to add one yet, feel free but be careful about WP:NPOV! :-) -- Lochaber 16:02, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- There is one now :) Worldtraveller 16:12, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
"England"?
I think it's more appropriate to describe the film as being set in 'Great Britain', as the situation would have been the same across the whole of the island. Changed. 82.36.124.236 20:48, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Eh, that's me above. pomegranate 20:54, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
By the way, there is no such thing as the England island. Please check up on your geography. This is what drove me to make the above changes. Referring to Great Britian (the island) or the United Kingdom, as 'England', is very irritating, especially to Scottish and Welsh people. pomegranate 21:00, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)