| Revision as of 04:05, 26 May 2005 editEtacar11 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers13,355 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:44, 26 May 2005 edit undoAldreds (talk | contribs)53 editsm commentsNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *Don't create articles about yourself | *Don't create articles about yourself | ||
| *Don't insert links to your own home page] | *Don't insert links to your own home page] | ||
| :* Everyone is free to put what they want (within reason) on their user page. This is not your user page. ] 04:05, 26 May 2005 (UTC) | :* Everyone is free to put what they want (within reason) on their user page. This is not your user page. ] 04:05, 26 May 2005 (UTC)Thanks] | ||
| *'''Delete''' pointless, unencyclopedic. - ] 23:19, 25 May 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' pointless, unencyclopedic. - ] 23:19, 25 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *Please explain how this is unencylopedic--is it that there are too few links to other parts of Misplaced Pages? I've looked at the guidelines and fail to see how this is unencyclopedic.] | *Please explain how this is unencylopedic--is it that there are too few links to other parts of Misplaced Pages? I've looked at the guidelines and fail to see how this is unencyclopedic.] | ||
| :* It's just not something anyone is likely to look up (in my opinion). Nothing personal. Not to mention it violates ] ] 04:05, 26 May 2005 (UTC) | :* It's just not something anyone is likely to look up (in my opinion). Nothing personal. Not to mention it violates ] ] 04:05, 26 May 2005 (UTC)Thanks] | ||
Revision as of 05:44, 26 May 2005
Networks and partnerships
Unencyclopedic and original research. This page may also have been already deleted yesterday. Delete JeremyA 03:06, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
The page was not deleted merely modified to make it more encyclopedic.Leave
- Delete. Reads like an internal HR Memo more than an encyclopedia article. Scimitar 15:02, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
Delete non-encyclopedic Bgeer 16:09, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Could have been speedy deleted as nonsense. Plus, it's probably a copyvio too. ~leif ☺ (talk) 22:40, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I have a problem with this comment. While I agree that this is original work from my students it is in no way a copyright violation and the suggestion that this is the case is insulting and defamitory. I would also like to draw this person's attention to the following rules of Misplaced Pages which appear to have been ignored on the Misplaced Pages link he has included to his wikipedia home page:
- Please do not bite the newcomers
- Don't create articles about yourself
- Don't insert links to your own home pageScot Aldred
- Everyone is free to put what they want (within reason) on their user page. This is not your user page. Etacar11 04:05, 26 May 2005 (UTC)ThanksScot Aldred
- Delete pointless, unencyclopedic. - Etacar11 23:19, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- Please explain how this is unencylopedic--is it that there are too few links to other parts of Misplaced Pages? I've looked at the guidelines and fail to see how this is unencyclopedic.Scot Aldred
- It's just not something anyone is likely to look up (in my opinion). Nothing personal. Not to mention it violates Misplaced Pages:No_original_research Etacar11 04:05, 26 May 2005 (UTC)ThanksScot Aldred