| Revision as of 11:33, 12 July 2007 editSilentVoice (talk | contribs)425 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 13:07, 12 July 2007 edit undoMichaelW (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users746 edits →I am stopping now my useless commentsNext edit → |
| Line 70: |
Line 70: |
|
It is useless to tell a blind person what colors are. Because they can't see them. You guys will never be able to understand why freedom is important. I think is useless for me to continue here. I hope people reading this article realize it is slanted in favor of Castro. Pretty much everything in this article is POV. As to having arguments between two groups or Points of Views is totally useless too. You have your point of view and I have mine. Mine is base in living in the system that Castro created. While yours is base in the fantasy and propaganda that the system creates to attract foreigners like you. That is a big difference in how we can see the system and our level of experience. Workers of the world you will have more to lose than your chains in a communist totalitarian society. Wake up from the snake charmers talk about equality etc. There is none in a communist system. |
|
It is useless to tell a blind person what colors are. Because they can't see them. You guys will never be able to understand why freedom is important. I think is useless for me to continue here. I hope people reading this article realize it is slanted in favor of Castro. Pretty much everything in this article is POV. As to having arguments between two groups or Points of Views is totally useless too. You have your point of view and I have mine. Mine is base in living in the system that Castro created. While yours is base in the fantasy and propaganda that the system creates to attract foreigners like you. That is a big difference in how we can see the system and our level of experience. Workers of the world you will have more to lose than your chains in a communist totalitarian society. Wake up from the snake charmers talk about equality etc. There is none in a communist system. |
|
] 11:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC). |
|
] 11:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC). |
|
|
|
|
|
:Dear Silent Voice, |
|
|
:My comments are based on having spent some time in Cuba living and working with ordinary Cubans. I met people who felt like you did, who were blind to the positives of Cuban society because their main desires were not on offer. If you took Cuba out of its historical and political context, then their criticisms would have been valid, but in the face of unrelenting US hostility, their main complaints could only be answered positively by Cuba giving up its independence. |
|
|
|
|
|
:I assure you that I do know the importance of freedom, but I also understand the difference between freedom to and freedom from, and I understand that freedoms claimed by one person are often based on the denial of freedoms to someone else. |
|
|
|
|
|
:Your thought that the article is slanted in favour of Castro speaks more to your misunderstanding of Misplaced Pages than it does of the actual article. Many many editors covering the wide range of opinion about Castro and Cuba, have argued over the content and achieved a result which none of us are entirely happy with. Which is as should be on such a contraversial issue. It suggests a balance which is the next best thing to a neutral POV. |
|
|
|
|
|
:Your comments are useless - not because we are blind but because they are a simple repetition of claims we have read many times before, in forms far better argued than you. All you have to say is "this is the way I see it and you MUST agree with me". Sorry mate - it ain't that easy. ] 13:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC) |
I am continuing in response to MichaelW comment if anyone is interested in following the discussion then go to the archives to see prior comments
The way I look at the definition of coup d'etat is a quick grab for power from an existing government and I agree that Castro did manage to do that. Otherwise he will not be in power today. He try without success to get to power by democratic means but he could not by whatever reasons.
Obviously Cubans wanted a change when he grabbed power and many probably though they had something good for a little while with the revolution as long as they were not affected by all the private property confiscations in the name of the people by the revolution (Castro) but we soon learn once he had control of the press that we were going in the path of an authoritarian regime commanded by our commander in chief Castro.
As for your comments on Chavez not being a dictator. You must be blind. He seem to have being elected by the people of Venezuela but was he? Do you think his best friend Castro did not lecture him about how to manipulate Venezuela's poor buying their vote? Something he(Chavez) is actually trying to do in the US by offering discounted fuel for heating to poor people? DO you think Chavez does this things because he cares about them? No he does not he cares about that he cares about the influence he can get from those people that he is helping here.
Yes Chavez is a dictator also. Have we not seen in the news in radio and tv how he arbitrarily stop the license of an independent TV station because it was critical of his government.
What would you have done if Richard Nixon had order using executive power of his government to close the Washington-Post newspaper after that paper showed everyone about the Watergate scandal? I know many of you can not even imagine things like this happening in this country.
Just think for a second how democratic is Chavez that now he had to dissolve the equivalent to the Senate and the representative they all happen to vote in favor of giving him full power to rule on his own without the checks and balance of a congress. Do you think those are not the signs of a dictator? Soon Venezuelan will have one ballot were only Chavez appear on it and unfortuanatelly I believe is too late for them
to vote him out. I am betting the only way he will relinquish power is when he die just like Castro. Do you think is right that just one person should have so much power? If you answer yes to that last question then I am wasting my time here. Is like going back to the times of Kings and Queens even them were not as powerful as today's modern dictators with access to information at their finger tips with advance computers and technology of all kind to control their own people.
Please read Animal Farm if you have not and also 1984. I read those books for the first time when I was in my 30s here in the US.
Do you know why? Because Castro does not let those books be published in Cuba. Those books were portraying the life I and millions of other Cubans had to endure under Castro's rule. Slogans like "Patria o Muerte venceremos" finding and enemy to blame for everything (the US) and the list goes on everything there is a portrait of the Cuba I knew well and that foreigners visiting Cuba hardly experience when they get the government guided tour of the goodness of socialism staying at 5 stars hotels only for foreigners. WHat would you say if all of the sudden all the hotels in this country could be use only by rich Europeans visiting here? (that is what happen in Cuba where any foreigner is above any national)
I was so impress with those little books. Since the guy that wrote them is long gone and he wrote them even before the Cuban revolution existed. I was surprise to see that totalitarian regimes be leftist or rightist create similar systems were they had to repress people and information. Were "we the people" end up loosing against the monopoly of the state over our life. Where the state decide about how many pants and what type and color you can have during the year and even with who you meet. If you like a system like that you probably should vote for some one like Klinton and then let us say we let her do as she pleases! We will soon loose every freedom we have and you will be looking over your shoulder and being very careful what you say and to whom you talk. Being afraid of "Big Brother" spying on you!
Many people do like that kind of system and thrive in it specially is good for the none talented, the snitches the ones that like to live without working hard all they need to do is agree with everything the maximum leader says. that's all.
I and many other people think we should have the right to each of us have their own opinion.
Is not very far fetch that very soon governments will have the power thru technology to be able to watch over each of us like Big Brother. Everything you do or say will be recorded. Do you think governments any government should have that kind of control over individuals? I think is best a system in which you are able to voice your
opinion your POV without fear of getting kill. Without the fear of retribution against your family. Without the fear of losing your job or not getting a job just because you do not happen to agree with what the government think or do. I am a bit sad that many of you have not experience a system like that and think is a good thing.
I believe the individual should have the right to choose no the government bureaucrats. I believe we should all have a voice and not necessarily the same voice singing in unison.
It is useless to tell a blind person what colors are. Because they can't see them. You guys will never be able to understand why freedom is important. I think is useless for me to continue here. I hope people reading this article realize it is slanted in favor of Castro. Pretty much everything in this article is POV. As to having arguments between two groups or Points of Views is totally useless too. You have your point of view and I have mine. Mine is base in living in the system that Castro created. While yours is base in the fantasy and propaganda that the system creates to attract foreigners like you. That is a big difference in how we can see the system and our level of experience. Workers of the world you will have more to lose than your chains in a communist totalitarian society. Wake up from the snake charmers talk about equality etc. There is none in a communist system.
SilentVoice 11:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC).
