| Revision as of 23:02, 27 May 2005 editVioletriga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,361 edits FAC?← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:41, 28 May 2005 edit undoIzogi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,280 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Just came across this article and it's looking great! ] seems to have done a great job making this into a very good piece of work. I'd love to nominate this as a ], but I know there's one thing that might hold it back - references. If someone could add this one missing section (perhaps by rearranging the External links section) then I reckon it could become featured. ] ] 23:02, 27 May 2005 (UTC) | Just came across this article and it's looking great! ] seems to have done a great job making this into a very good piece of work. I'd love to nominate this as a ], but I know there's one thing that might hold it back - references. If someone could add this one missing section (perhaps by rearranging the External links section) then I reckon it could become featured. ] ] 23:02, 27 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Thanks, that's very flattering and I agree with you about the references. (So far I've been lazy, since a lot of the info that I've added has been coming from recollections of my own experience.) I'll look at improving them over the next few days to help back up the information. I also still feel that it's not quite complete yet, and it trails off a bit towards the end. In particular, there's quite a bit more that might be said about the methods of reducing light pollution. If anyone wants to help fill that in, the door's open. Otherwise I'll see what I can do. ] 01:41, 28 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:41, 28 May 2005
This article will help me with my science project. Thanks!
"really semi-barbaric densely populated areas of the United States" -- that's supposed to be NPOV?!
FAC?
Just came across this article and it's looking great! Izogi seems to have done a great job making this into a very good piece of work. I'd love to nominate this as a FAC, but I know there's one thing that might hold it back - references. If someone could add this one missing section (perhaps by rearranging the External links section) then I reckon it could become featured. violet/riga (t) 23:02, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's very flattering and I agree with you about the references. (So far I've been lazy, since a lot of the info that I've added has been coming from recollections of my own experience.) I'll look at improving them over the next few days to help back up the information. I also still feel that it's not quite complete yet, and it trails off a bit towards the end. In particular, there's quite a bit more that might be said about the methods of reducing light pollution. If anyone wants to help fill that in, the door's open. Otherwise I'll see what I can do. Izogi 01:41, 28 May 2005 (UTC)